It must have seemed an attractive idea at the time. But a much-heralded push to organize mass violations of an IRS ban on political endorsements in churches seems to be attracting few takers. And the IRS has already pledged to review complaints about any churches that do participate.
The so-called “Pulpit Initiative” (earlier MnIndy post) was launched by the Alliance Defense Fund, an offshoot of James (Focus on the Family) Dobson’s evangelical empire. As the Arizona-based organization’s website explains, this coming Sunday, September 28, is the target date for the effort. When IRS complaints ensue, ADF’s strategy is then to take individual cases to court in an attempt to overturn the IRS rule.
But as zero hour approaches, there are signs that few churches care to be so cavalier about their nonprofit tax status. Last week ADF officials pledged in an email response to Minnesota Independent, “We will have updated information regarding the pastors participating in the ‘Pulpit Initiative’ on our website… beginning on September 22nd, a week before Pulpit Freedom Sunday when the pastors give their messages.”
Three days after that self-appointed deadline, however, there is still no accounting of participants on the ADF website, however, and two subsequent emails to ADF official Erik Stanley asking for the update have gone unanswered. I phoned over a dozen metro-area evangelical churches to ask if any were planning to participate; so far, none has even called back. (I’ll update if any do.)
The Internal Revenue Service, meanwhile, said on Tuesday that it will review complaints over “Pulpit Freedom Sunday,” as the event is also called. Several former IRS employees have filed a complaint with their former employer alleging wrongdoing by ADF and participating churches. The prospect of legal action is of course no discouragement to ADF; it’s the plan. Churches, however, seem to be less sanguine about the idea.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State said they will be reporting churches who violate the law to the IRS. Said Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United, “Pastors who are thinking of joining the ADF’s gambit still have time to change their minds and I urge them to do so.”
One Minnesota church pastor, however, has been very vocal about his plans to violate the law. Pastor Gus Booth of Warroad Community Church–located in a small town near the Canadian border–says he has no qualms about endorsing John McCain from the pulpit and in fact has been doing so all summer. Booth was also a delegate to the Republican National Convention.
Booth told National Public Radio on Wednesday, “Bottom line is, I’m a spiritual leader in this community, and spiritual leaders need to make decisions. We need to lead spiritually, and we need to be able to speak about the moral issues of the day. And right now, the moral issues of today are also the political issues of today.”
But not all religious leaders agree that mixing religion and politics is a good idea. The Anti-Defamation League criticized the move on Wednesday.
“Ministers and pastors, in their personal capacity, already have every right to support or oppose candidates for public office,” said Abraham H. Foxman, national director for ADL. “They can speak out on political issues, and promote voter participation and voter education initiatives. But politicizing churches coerces congregants, distorts the political system and poses a serious threat to religious liberty.”














10 Comments »
Comment posted September 25, 2008 @ 2:37 pm
God must be having a devil of a time with all these self-proclaimed,religious fundamentalist neo-cons using his name in vain to support their ultra-conservative political agendas…
Comment posted September 25, 2008 @ 2:48 pm
Doesn’t this mean that each of these churches just sacrificed (sorry) their IRS non-profit tax exemption? Who cares what these type of “churches” preach? If they endorse a candidate from the pulpit, it automatically sets in motion the mechanisms to change their tax status, which means more tax revenue to bail out the rich on Wall Street. Wait…I mean for health care, social security, and education.
Comment posted September 25, 2008 @ 3:38 pm
I wonder how much politics goes on in Zionist-friendly synagogues?
Comment posted September 25, 2008 @ 6:11 pm
Preachers, Ministers, Priests, and Rabbis should be free to endorse cancidates and express political opinions. They should not be tax exempt.
Comment posted September 26, 2008 @ 12:06 am
It is all about timing. This ridiculous initiative isn’t really expected to succeed.
Of course, separation of Church and State is sacrosanct.
The real objective is to motivate the religious ultra-conservative faction to, once again, get out and vote on this single-issue topic.
Make no mistake. The puppet-masters, which have used the religious right to usurp control of one of our political parties, are extremely adept at this kind of strategy.
The real difficulty is trying to separate Truth from Spin.
Perhaps, it is easier to be told who to vote for…
Comment posted September 26, 2008 @ 1:40 pm
Please G*d, I pray that you use your power to allow the houses of worship express political endorsements based upon what you tell the religious leaders in personal visions. I am sure that if they want to participate in elections, and that they will be willing to pay taxes like other businesses and other taxpayers. As I pray to thee, please tell me why you inflated your son to 800 to 900 feet, had him tell a television evangelical that he had to raise hundreds of millions of dollars to find a cure for cancer? Lord, since you are G*d, would it not have bee easier to just tell this Evangelist the cure?
Comment posted September 27, 2008 @ 9:05 am
The complete fact of the matter is this. A 501 c3 religious tax exemption is not a right. It is something applied for and possibly granted. When a church applies for a 501 c3 status they go into it knowing what the rules are. Therefore, either accept the rules of that for which you are applying or do not have it. If you cannot agree to the rules of a 501c3 then you shall not have the exemption.
IRS, please do your duty, uphold the law, and if these churches preach politics from the pulpit, PLEASE revoke their tax exempt status immediately!
Comment posted September 28, 2008 @ 1:22 pm
Voter Issue Guide: 2008 Presidential Race
http://www.afa.net/08VG/index.html
Comment posted September 28, 2008 @ 6:45 pm
I was fully braced to stand up mid-service and march out if my pastor had made any kind of endorsement of some neo-con agenda or candidate. Thankfully, it didn’t happen here but it’s heartbreaking that it happened anywhere.
Comment posted October 2, 2008 @ 11:04 am
I think churches are on a slippery slope called the lure of power.
I have been Christian all of my life and left all “religious institutions” during the last election. I have also worked at one time for Crisis Pregnancy Centers. What I found was that I could VERY EASILY get volunteers for political campaigning but when it came time to donate to help unwed pregnant mothers with babysitting so they could work, or a place to sleep that wasn’t pitiable, those same enthusiastic volunteers weren’t available. So I could talk someone into keeping their unborn child and condemn them to the life of an outcast in the Church.
The pulpit should be used to inspire people to great acts of mercy and compassion. Maybe if the Church were doing it’s job, we wouldn’t have to worry so much over the legislation aspect. People would simply be inclined to do the right thing or get help if they made a mistake.
It’s so very easy to chase politics and power; it’s much harder to inspire and work for all humanity.
My kids started get flack from a friend because they were allowed to read the Harry Potter series. When they asked me about the accusations from the religious friend, I told them that the world would be it’s own undoing just fine with or without Harry Potter because the Church has lost view of it’s first obligation – taking care of those around us – instead of legislating those around us. Whatever happened to invoking the name of God instead that of McCain, Palin, Obama or Biden? He’s not powerful enough? or can’t get you the spotlight?
I will not return to any Church until the satanic lure of politics and hatred has been stripped from it’s halls; and this kind of behavior only furthers my resolve. PAY FOR THE RIGHT TO BE A POLITICAL ACTION GROUP IF YOU WANT IT – otherwise stop disguising yourself as a “church”.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment