Monday’s House vote on the proposed $700 billion bailout package resulted in some strange political bedfellows. Perhaps most surprising was Rep. Keith Ellison — widely viewed as the most liberal member of the Minnesota delegation — aligned with staunch conservative Rep. John Kline in supporting the measure. The proposal was ultimately defeated by a 228-205 margin as many legislators bulked at bailing out Wall Street investment firms for their reckless behavior.
But Ellison staunchly defends his vote. “It’s very tempting for me to say I’m not quote unquote bailing out Wall Street,” says Ellison, speaking on the phone from Washington. “Who wants to bail out Wall Street? Nobody. But Wall Street is not completely disconnected from main street.”
The freshman says that the reaction from constituents has been mixed, but that the dismal economic climate compelled him to support the measure. “I’ve heard from countless realtors, community bankers, restaurant owners all talking about the dire impact this credit crisis is having on their businesses,” he says. “All these people have folks on their payroll. And all these folks who work for them have to make rent, they have to make mortgages, have to buy school lunches. I just can’t leave them adrift like that no matter how mad I am at Wall Street and those golden parachute people.”
Ellison acknowledges that there are additional measures that he wishes were included in the legislation, such as a provision allowing bankruptcy judges to alter the terms of mortgages held by struggling homeowners and a transaction tax to help cover the cost. “But you know what? It’s called Democracy,” he says. “If me and you had to order one pizza, we’d have to negotiate, and I wouldn’t get everything I wanted and you wouldn’t get everything you wanted. Hopefully we would end up with a pizza we could both eat.”
Ellison says he will back the bailout proposal again if it comes up for a second vote as expected tomorrow. He’s uncertain if the revised bill will ultimately pass, but notes that several legislators (most notably Minnesota Rep. Jim Ramstand) who opposed the measure on Monday now intend to vote for the package. “It looks like they’re creeping up,” he says. “I suspect they’ll get there because they’ve got the full-court press on them now.”




5 Comments »
Comment posted October 2, 2008 @ 11:29 pm
Ellison. What a sell out. seriously. I’m ashamed for him.
Comment posted October 3, 2008 @ 10:44 am
A hard vote, but the right one. Well done, Rep. Ellison. We sent you to Congress to be more than a poll taker. We need your ability to balance competing demands and claims. I hate the bailout, in whatever form, but when someone with the integrity of Warren Buffet calls the crisis an economic “Pearl Harbor” it’s time to move.
Comment posted October 3, 2008 @ 1:00 pm
North Minneapolis legislator? Check the headline.
Comment posted October 4, 2008 @ 7:27 am
Anyone with any imagination, sense of history, and guts would have stood up and pushed back with a proposal to put the money into reviving the two best New Deal programs - the WPA and the CCC.
Let the money go where it is most needed, will produce the most results, and benefit the most people.
Instead, we’re going ever deeper into hock in order to prop up the individual retirement accounts of
the ever-dwindling portion of our population looking forward to retiring on investment income.
Everyone wants to be royalty. If no one takes care of the serfs, there won’t be much room for royalty,
will there?
Once again, I am enormously disappointed with Mr. Ellison.
Comment posted October 4, 2008 @ 12:48 pm
Again the American people have not been heard , the Majority of Americans said NO to the bailout , I regret voting for people who do not listen.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment