In an interview with reporter Esme Murphy on WCCO-TV Sunday morning, Republican state Rep. Erik Paulsen commented for the first time on a line of attack that Republicans pushed hard last week: that Paulsen’s DFL opponent for the state’s 3rd Congressional District, Ashwin Madia, is less qualified than Paulsen because he’s unmarried, rents an apartment and doesn’t fit the district’s “demographic.” Paulsen, the argument goes, is “one of them.”
WCCO’s Esme Murphy: There were Republicans going around this week talking about the fact that Ashwin Madia is not married and doesn’t own a home. What do you think about those kinds of comments?
State Rep. Erik Paulsen: I can only speak to my own personal experience. As someone, again, who’s been a lifelong resident of the area and pays property taxes and understands the real difficulties that families are going through right now, I’m focused on how we’re going to help solve the difficulties that are facing Minnesota families and small businesses. We’ve got to keep things on track right now –
Murphy: Do you condemn that kind of criticism?
Paulsen: I think it’s inappropriate to have harsh attack ads that mischaracterize candidates’ positions or votes. And I’m sure we’re going to continue to see additional mudslinging. I hope that’s not the case because I expect to get vastly outspent by some significant special interest groups.
That exchange didn’t illuminate the question of whether Paulsen takes responsibility for his allies’ slams on Madia’s personal life at press conferences last week. But Paulsen’s dodging of Murphy’s questions suggests he doesn’t condemn them — a likelihood reinforced by the presence of his campaign staff at a Sept. 30 news conference called by state Sen. Geoff Michel (R-Edina) at which Michel called Madia a “carpetbagger.” At the end of his prepared comments that day, Michel referred reporters to Paulsen campaign staffers at the press conference.
State Sen. Geoff Michel: So that’s our main message today. There are Paulsen campaign staffers here for additional follow-up or questions.
While taking reporters’ questions, Michel asserted that Madia is the only current candidate for congress to have filed for office using his or her parents’ address.
Reporter: Do you know that for a fact? Or, how do you know that?
Michel: There are people in this room, including the Paulsen campaign, who know that as a fact.
When Michel couldn’t answer reporters’ questions about the details behind his charge that Madia is a “carpetbagger,” he again appeared to defer to Paulsen staffers in the room.
Michel: There are others here who can dive deeper into the details [of Madia's residential history].
On WCCO Sunday, Madia repeated his condemnation of ads by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) attacking Paulsen — “to the extent that they’re inaccurate” — but said federal law against candidates coordinating with outside groups prohibited him from communicating with the DCCC about the ads.
Murphy interviewed each candidate separately, including the Independence Party’s David Dillon, who disputed Madia’s version of his options: “You can pick up the phone and say that’s a bald-faced lie.” Dillon roundly criticized negative campaigning, particularly the DCCC’s, as a “new low” for the district. But he said that in any case his campaign — which he figures is now drawing support from around 20 percent of voters — would benefit from the other two candidates tearing each other down.
All three candidates said they supported the financial sector bailout bill signed into law at the end of the week, but not its earlier version — which Paulsen pointedly identified as the Bush administration’s, saying it amounted to a “blank check.” (Madia has said he would have supported the first bailout proposal only if it was the only alternative to inaction.)
Several questions went only to the two leading candidates. On Iraq, Madia said he would set withdrawal goals that would bring U.S. troops home within two years. Paulsen said he would go along with time horizons set by the Iraqi government. On energy, Paulsen endorsed domestic drilling for oil off the continental shelf, while Madia called for a comprehensive energy strategy that would include domestic drilling alongside exploration of alternative sources.
Dillon interview:
Paulsen interview:
Madia interview:













5 Comments »
Comment posted October 5, 2008 @ 5:49 pm
Funny how Paulsen sends Geoff Michel and Ron Carey to hold a press conference for him, they slander Ashwin Madia and use coded racist terms, and he doesn’t have the guts to admit it was wrong and condemn it. I can only surmise that he agrees with this type of low blow campaigning and he was aware it was going to happen and that he orchestrated it. After all, his campaign staffers were at the press conference to take questions after Michel & Carey talked. He’s showing us a very slimy side that I don’t think the voters of the 3rd like….bad form for Erik Paulsen! Madia did condemn the ads for any untruthfulness in them, so Dillon is just postering and doesn’t get it. Madia certainly is not going to risk a large fine when he has already publicly condemned the ads.
Comment posted October 5, 2008 @ 8:11 pm
I live in the 6th district but what Erik Paulsen says is ridiculous. Madia is someone who actually cares about what happens. This is why our country is moving to the left.
Please Vote Tinklenberg, 2008
Comment posted October 5, 2008 @ 8:14 pm
Can anbody have been pleased after listening to the Geoff Michel press conference? I would love to meet them. I call on Erik Paulsen to condemn the ridiculous message communicated by Geoff Michel and Ron Carey. How low can these guys go? Are the voters supposed to be afraid of Ash because he isn’t just like Geoff & Erik? Come on.
The voters I talk to want their next representative to be passionate about the issues that matter to middle class families:
* The Economy
* Education
* Taxes
* Affordable Health Care
* Iraq
* Working together to repair our country
Ashwin Madia: Ready to Lead
Comment posted October 5, 2008 @ 11:28 pm
Esme proved herself a terrible interviewer by not askin all the candidates the same questions. Had Esme bothered to ask David Dillon would have said it’s time to start leaving Iraq NOW! The government there is democratically elected, they have rejected harboring terrorists, and they have their own oil wealth for self financing.
David Dillon is the only candidate who has rejected American’s version of financial terrorism (special interest money) and will represent us in Washington completely free from that influence.
David Dillon, Google Him!
Comment posted October 7, 2008 @ 2:30 pm
I was so pleased that Ashwin Madia condemned the recent DCCC mailings and ads for any inaccurate or misleading information. I was surprised to hear Dillon suggest that Madia could pick up the phone and try to stop the ads. Either he is counting on viewers to not understand campaign finance laws or he himself does not. I was very disappointed that Paulsen did not disavow the recent character attacks on Madia by the GOP. He was given the chance to do so twice during the interview. In fact, his comments seemed to further the attacks (although a little less aggressively than Ron Carey).
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment