A Washington, D.C., watchdog group is filing a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service against television evangelist Mac Hammond’s Brooklyn Park mega-church based on documents obtained by Minnesota Monitor that purport the pastor arranged several lucrative deals with the church.
These documents describe financial agreements in which Hammond bought a plane from the Living Word Christian Center and then leased it and another plane back to the church for almost $900,000 a year and obtained loans — some of them unsecured — for $1.9 million.
Church officials did not respond to repeated requests for comment, and Minnesota Monitor could not confirm the authenticity of the documents.But when shown the documents as part of the reporting for this story, Citizens for Responsibility in Washington (CREW) said it would file a complaint against the church with the IRS.
According to the documents, which involved a loan application in 2003 and contained over 100 pages of pictures and detailed descriptions of the church’s land amounts, financial transactions and administrative history, Hammond owns two airplanes, one bought from Living Word for $1.06 million on credit supplied by Living Word. He leases the planes back to the church at a total annual rate of more than $893,000. The church asserts that “the aircraft are important to the efficient management of its ministry at the present time…” Living Word also rents a hangar to store the planes, and it pays for the expenses of the planes as well.
In addition, the church made several loans to Hammond since 2000 totaling at least $1.9 million: two were for the planes, three were unsecured, and one enabled Hammond to purchase a house in Florida.
CREW’s complaint alleges that Living Word, since it is a tax-exempt organization, has engaged in improper financial transactions with Hammond. According to the complaint, Hammond is one of seven members of the church’s board of directors, making him an “insider” under federal law. CREW asserts that tax law prohibits “insiders” from benefiting from the church.
The complaint further alleges that the leasing arrangement violates federal laws barring favorable financial deals to people in Hammond’s position and prohibits using charitable resources to compensate “insiders” for activity not related to the church’s tax-exempt purpose.
“Pastor Hammond and the LWCC have shown a disturbing pattern of violating federal tax law, and the IRS has done nothing,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW. “The IRS has not hesitated to target liberal organizations. When will enough be enough and the IRS finally step in and investigate a conservative church that has repeatedly demonstrated its contempt for federal law?”
This will be the second complaint CREW has filed against the church. In October, CREW alleged that the church violated tax laws when Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., made a campaign speech at a Sunday service and web broadcast. During Hammond’s introduction of the candidate, he told the church that he would be voting for Bachmann.
There were two problems with Hammond’s endorsement: Hammond did not live in Bachmann’s district, and endorsing a candidate from the pulpit violates of IRS rules concerning churches.
The story posted on Minnesota Monitor generated considerable interest in the media, both for the potential tax violations and Bachmann’s statements in her speech (saying she’s a “fool for Christ”). CREW alleged that Living Word was improperly using its tax-exempt status to influence the outcome of an election. The story was picked up by the local media, the Associated Press, The New York Times and hundreds of blogs.
The IRS has yet to issue a decision on the complaint.
Tim Mooney, senior counsel at CREW, said this second complaint could spell trouble for the church. “It’s conceivable that the IRS could revoke Living Word’s 501(c)3 status,” he said.
Joe Bodell of the Minnesota Monitor contributed to this report. You can read his writing at MN Campaign Report. Andy Birkey also writes at Eleventh Avenue South.













44 Comments »
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 5:28 pm
A very biased report… As a long time member of Living Word Christian Center, I can attest that Pastor Hammond is a man of deep convictions, and high moral standards. I don’t blindly follow any “man”, but knowing all the good he’s done for the church and the community/city/nation/world through the church (a list that would be much longer than your negative report), I will give him the benefit of doubt many times over. The documents you provided; a very legitimate legal document (exhibit A) of which I had no issue (and really was nobody else’s business to publish), was appended with documents (exhibits C&D) of which described little and didn’t even mention the source. I could have easily created these in any word processor. Finally, if you can’t confirm the authenticity of documents you present a proof of impropriety, why show them? And then finally to publish Exhibit “B”, an article of the Minnesota Monitor unrelated to this issue (as if YOUR article adds any credibility to YOUR claim?) Make all of the quick assumption you want. I’ll wait for all of the facts…
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 5:42 pm
Was CREW an appropriate choice? CREW is “Citizens Responsible for Ethics in Washington.”
Now what the heck does this have to do with Washington?
Yeah, he’s a supporter of Bachmann, and in the case of his (allegedly) illegal endorsement of Bachmann, CREW was an appropriate choice. But this has nothing to do with Washington politics or with Bachmann.
Why not have a local church-state group file the complaint?
I’m all for exposing misuse of church funds (if these allegations turn out to be true, they are very serious), but it seems to me that CREW was not the right group to do the complaint and the publicity.
Considering CREW’s links to the Foley scandal, this just looks vindictive and partisan, when really it should not be politicized.
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 5:45 pm
Thank you for your comment I think you may be confusing Minnesota Monitor with CREW. CREW actually filed the complaint and organized the evidence to which you are referring.
Our report does not place blame: “allege” and “purport” only point to suspicion.
I understand that you feel our report is slamming your pastor, but we are only relaying the facts as we know them.
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 7:28 pm
A SECOND IRS violation? What, is Hammond looking to challenge Keith X Hakim-Ellison for his congressional seat?
When we get confirmation of an adulterous affair we’ll know that an announcement is imminent!
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 7:37 pm
SHOOTING THE MESSENGER This is a story of substantial public interest. Pastor’s who start or build mega institutions and treat them as their own, who hand pick and control trustees, who structure their institutions by design so that they, the pastors, become and remain vital to the continuity of “their
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 8:02 pm
I agree with your concerns… Especially this:
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 11:58 pm
Consider the source The problem with these types of allegations is that they immediately appeal to peoples’ prejudices, and thus the accused are presumed guilty and must prove their innocence.
A word about Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington: Despite their noble-sounding name, please do not mistake this group as being nonpartisan. Last year they released their list of the 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress. The list consisted of 17 Republicans and just three Democrats. Please.
According to the CREW website its executive director, Melanie Sloan, worked as an aide to Rep. John Conyers (D-MI). He is the one who is most stridently calling for the impeachment of President Bush. Is this an “impartial watchdog group
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 4:33 am
Let’s be honest. C’mon, people. It’s not that difficult to see what’s going on here.
It’s getting harder and harder to call myself a Christian.
What will those of us who believe in God and also believe in truth and honesty call ourselves in the future?
It’s unfortunate that money grubbing, greedy fools out there are getting away with using my faith, my religion and my God to line their pockets.
And, yes … Ms Bachmann is one of them.
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 7:26 am
Attacking the Messenger Part II Republicans? Democrats? The Rush Limbaugh(right) and Huffington(left) approach has eroded public discussion in this country to the point that almost every debate of substance is derailed by slurs like “liberal” and “right-wing.” It reminds me of the members of congress who have been in trouble for criminal behavior in recent years — they each, despite overwhelming evidence of guilt, attempted to distract from the substance of the case against them by condemning their prosecution as partisan politic. If condeming the source of the information were the trump card, we might as well forget any hope for the rule of law.
The issue here isn’t who filed the complaint. The issue is whether there is substance to the complaint and the ONLY way that anyone will know the answer to that is to let the investigation move forward. Let the investigation move forward. Let the facts fall where they may. Let those who are without guilt be vindicated. Let those with guilt be condemned to an appropriate sanction.
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 7:27 am
Unfortunately this seems to be quite commonplace although this case probably stands out due to the large nature of the church. With the rise of the Bush administration, that purported to be Christian while doing the exact opposite of anything of such nature, some televangelists and “Christian” leaders got power hungry, disregarded the teachings of Christ and embezzled money from their institutions, as well as supported “conservative” candidates. That is of course illegal and should be exposed.
If Hammond is guilty, he needs to be sentenced for any crimes committed, as he is NOT above the law, and the church needs to pay financially for its misdeeds.
Brief aside, I would highly recomment David Ray Griffin’s “Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11″ as required reading for Christians.
Also for a satirical take on the Haggard scandal:
Evangelist tired of insisting he’s not gay
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 5:30 pm
As I was saying… Monsieur LeProf, Concerned Member and Robert;
Unfortunately your responses all validate my first paragraph-it sure sounds as though each one of you has already tried, judged and condemned Rev. Hammond with nothing more to go on than unfounded accusations.
I am not saying that misdeeds-if there are any-should go unpunished. I am saying that you sound like you’re ready to string him up without hearing a shred of solid evidence.
And how has Michelle Bachmann lined her pockets? She’s only been in national office for a month!?
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 10:05 pm
Tried and Convicted? Not Hardly I am not sure how you reach the conclusion that those who demand an open and transparent investigation have somehow already tried and convicted the Reverend. If you follow the thread, you will see that my concern is that the allegation should be investigated thoroughly and independently. There are facts to support the call for further inquiry.
There is a history among some Church leaders who have wronged their congregation and history raises an alarm when we see facts on the surface that MIGHT be evidence of wrongdoing. THe fact that there is not conclusive proof at this stage, and perhaps not even strong evidence, does not negate the need for investigation. Virtually every investigation, those that result in convictions as well as those that result in acquittal, start with allegations — often from biased sources with less than pristine motivations. No, I am not saying he is guilty or innocent. I am just saying that something smells and I hope that there will be enough inertia here to see if it is dead rat or quality aged cheese.
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 10:26 pm
You’re right Concerned Member, I apologize. Rereading your post, I agree I should not have lumped you in with the guilty-as-soon-as-charged posters.
Comment posted February 10, 2007 @ 9:55 am
Response on live tv? Maybe we’ll get Hammond’s response on his live TV broadcast (Chan 11 – 10am). I’ve seen too many times things taken out of context and twisted. Not sure if he’ll use the platform to respond to these allegations, but would be interesting to check it out. Right now, it appears one-sided…
Comment posted February 10, 2007 @ 5:26 pm
Supposedly Pastor Mac will address the comments this weekend http://www.lwcc.org/HOME/index.cfm
LW @ Duluth/Superior
LW @ Eau Claire
LW @ 3 Degrees
Ministry Links
Mac Hammond Ministries
Winner’s Minute
Lynne Hammond
Living Word Bible Institute Session III Jan 30 – Mar 20
Stewardship Week with Rodney Howard-Browne Feb 13 – Feb 18
Winner’s Luncheon – March 2007 Mar 07
Pastor Mac will address many of the recent articles and allegations circulated in the media during the services this weekend. Also, the following is our public statement on these matters:
Living Word Christian Center has a long history of making every effort to conduct the financial affairs of the church with integrity and candor. It is standard procedure for all appropriate contracts and financial transactions to be reviewed by our law firm (Faegre and Benson), audited by an independent accounting firm (Ernestvedt and Christensen), and approved by our board.
Every effort is made, and will continue to be made, to completely comply with and diligently follow all applicable legal standards established by the IRS and the State of Minnesota for the conduct of non-profit organizations.
Living Word and those outside professionals involved in the conduct of our financial affairs remain confident any fair review of our dealings will reveal the validity of our effort to consistently be an accountable and honest ministry before God, our congregation, and our community.
EY: Services on webcast at 5:00 and 7:00 Saturday and 9:00 and 11:00 Sunday.
Comment posted February 10, 2007 @ 5:35 pm
It was prophesied Why is it that supposed Christians don’t seem to read their Bible so that they can recognize the warning Jesus, Paul and others gave us to identify false Christians? Take a look at these scriptures:
Acts 20:29 “I know that after my going away oppressive wolves will enter in among YOU and will not treat the flock with tenderness, 30 and from among YOU yourselves men will rise and speak twisted things to draw away the disciples after themselves.
Comment posted February 10, 2007 @ 10:37 pm
Recommend you watch… I watched the Living Word broadcast, and he did indeed address each and every one of the allegations. Instead of the expected “fall” of another TV evangelist (by many who have made premature judgments based on incomplete information), he very clearly articulated the many inaccuracies in these reports. After seeing the service, I personally don’t believe he is doing anything illegal or even immoral. I recommend before casting any more dispersions on a good man, that you hear his side of this story. It’s only fair.
Comment posted February 11, 2007 @ 8:56 am
agreed I attempted to watch his 5 pm, however I could not get in via webcast. We will have a reporter covering his service today from one of his satellite churches to ensure we can report his side as well.
Comment posted February 11, 2007 @ 11:39 am
I watched and was troubled by the flock’s blindness. I am also no longer a believer in Christianity….But
Amen to you brother!! Mac Hammond has perverted Christianity for monetary gain. It is sad to see a congregation so asleep and blind that they allow themselves to be ministered to by such a hypocrite. Just today, after an expose in the Minneapolis Star Tribune he spent the hour on TV, squirming under the scrutiny. Trying to justify a life lived for money and excess while hiding behind bible verses. Sick, sick, sick. His authority does not come from God, but from the money generated by those who
allow themselves to be deceived. Jesus did not need expensive cars, motorcycles, planes, multiple homes, and expensive clothes to preach his message. Mac Hammond is a worldly, materialistic, phoney whom Jesus would not approve of. I dare say Jesus would have opposed such philosophy.
Comment posted February 11, 2007 @ 9:25 pm
I suppose a tithe… If Mac required his standard 10-15% of your weekly income tithe today, you must have really felt ripped off….. Nothing like giving all your disposable income to the fallacy of some guy who “talks to God” but to have to then listen to somebody who actually is just stealing your money for his own personal gain. Somehow, I have to belive God would say something, “If one were meant to fly, I would have given him (her, let’s just say God was a step behind the times) wings”…….I guess that meant Mac needed TWO planes, not just one right. He didn’t get the wings, so he bought two pair instead of just the stock standard one….
I love Mac’s chruch. He does Breezy Point ceremonies…You know the type, the one where you go to a wedding and he spends 45 minutes trying to sell you his ministry and for that, you get a five minute wedding ceremony. Make no mistake….it is ALL ABOUT MAC. After all, he talks to God…..along with athletes who win the championship and conservative Republicans who win elections. God speaks to no one else…….
BTW: Mac’s “endorsement” and Bachman’s winning of the election was a blessing in disguise, more proof that “God” isn’t Republican…..What more can you ask for than a moron who can’t keep her hands off him (see the State of the Union) and is incapable of actually “working” with the President (she’s so in awe of Bush she probaby needs to change her panties every time she sees of a picture of him…..Guess “God” couldn’t cure her of lusting after another man besides her husband….). All in all, Bachman will be the billboard Republican in 2008 as to why the country should vote Democrat. It isn’t a question as to who “God” wants to win……it is a question as to who is at least remotely capable of actually doing the work of the people…….Clearly, Mac has NO IDEA as to what that is…..I’m sure he can fly somewhere though in one of his TWO planes to figure it out……
I’m done……….GOD wants me to go see “The DeParted”…….God tells me he loves Jack Nicholson……Especially that movie where Jack quoted him and said “YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH”……….and yes, God loves me even though I wouldn’t give Mac Hammond a dime (bag)……
BTW: You
Comment posted February 12, 2007 @ 3:15 pm
Re: shooting the messenger Excellent post.
Comment posted February 12, 2007 @ 3:58 pm
Yeah I watched it…. and he hoodwinked each member of the congregation as usual. Actually I cannot say he did that because the congregation actually gave him a standing ovation even before he started. Poor “Pastor Mac” was almost moved to tears.
But seriously, this was a classic demonstration of deceit in the modern day Christian church. It is the usual story…charismatic leader draws members in with the promise of prosperity as long as they bring their tithes into the church. Well after years of living a lie, it becomes very difficult to face the truth even if it is so blatantly obvious. How do you think Jim Jones got men and women to kill their own children? So please pray for these people. They are truly lost.
Now I have been to LWCC several times (on my wife’s insistence) and I will say it once again. He is a businessman masquerading as a pastor. Your money (including the amounts drawn on your credit cards) will fulfill his failed attempts at business. Worse than that he breaks practically every principle Jesus Christ has taught us. So you will lose financially and spiritually.
So please wipe the smudge of your glasses and find a good bible based church. Jesus Christ warned us of people like Mac Hammond so I could care less of the results of an IRS inquiry.
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 11:28 am
A very biased report… As a long time member of Living Word Christian Center, I can attest that Pastor Hammond is a man of deep convictions, and high moral standards. I don't blindly follow any “man”, but knowing all the good he's done for the church and the community/city/nation/world through the church (a list that would be much longer than your negative report), I will give him the benefit of doubt many times over. The documents you provided; a very legitimate legal document (exhibit A) of which I had no issue (and really was nobody else's business to publish), was appended with documents (exhibits C&D;) of which described little and didn't even mention the source. I could have easily created these in any word processor. Finally, if you can't confirm the authenticity of documents you present a proof of impropriety, why show them? And then finally to publish Exhibit “B”, an article of the Minnesota Monitor unrelated to this issue (as if YOUR article adds any credibility to YOUR claim?) Make all of the quick assumption you want. I'll wait for all of the facts…
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 11:42 am
Was CREW an appropriate choice? CREW is “Citizens Responsible for Ethics in Washington.”
Now what the heck does this have to do with Washington?
Yeah, he's a supporter of Bachmann, and in the case of his (allegedly) illegal endorsement of Bachmann, CREW was an appropriate choice. But this has nothing to do with Washington politics or with Bachmann.
Why not have a local church-state group file the complaint?
I'm all for exposing misuse of church funds (if these allegations turn out to be true, they are very serious), but it seems to me that CREW was not the right group to do the complaint and the publicity.
Considering CREW's links to the Foley scandal, this just looks vindictive and partisan, when really it should not be politicized.
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 11:45 am
Thank you for your comment I think you may be confusing Minnesota Monitor with CREW. CREW actually filed the complaint and organized the evidence to which you are referring.
Our report does not place blame: “allege” and “purport” only point to suspicion.
I understand that you feel our report is slamming your pastor, but we are only relaying the facts as we know them.
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 1:28 pm
A SECOND IRS violation? What, is Hammond looking to challenge Keith X Hakim-Ellison for his congressional seat?
When we get confirmation of an adulterous affair we'll know that an announcement is imminent!
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 1:37 pm
SHOOTING THE MESSENGER This is a story of substantial public interest. Pastor’s who start or build mega institutions and treat them as their own, who hand pick and control trustees, who structure their institutions by design so that they, the pastors, become and remain vital to the continuity of “their
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 2:02 pm
I agree with your concerns… Especially this:
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 5:58 pm
Consider the source The problem with these types of allegations is that they immediately appeal to peoples’ prejudices, and thus the accused are presumed guilty and must prove their innocence.
A word about Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington: Despite their noble-sounding name, please do not mistake this group as being nonpartisan. Last year they released their list of the 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress. The list consisted of 17 Republicans and just three Democrats. Please.
According to the CREW website its executive director, Melanie Sloan, worked as an aide to Rep. John Conyers (D-MI). He is the one who is most stridently calling for the impeachment of President Bush. Is this an “impartial watchdog group
Comment posted February 8, 2007 @ 10:33 pm
Let's be honest. C'mon, people. It's not that difficult to see what's going on here.
It's getting harder and harder to call myself a Christian.
What will those of us who believe in God and also believe in truth and honesty call ourselves in the future?
It's unfortunate that money grubbing, greedy fools out there are getting away with using my faith, my religion and my God to line their pockets.
And, yes … Ms Bachmann is one of them.
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 1:26 am
Attacking the Messenger Part II Republicans? Democrats? The Rush Limbaugh(right) and Huffington(left) approach has eroded public discussion in this country to the point that almost every debate of substance is derailed by slurs like “liberal” and “right-wing.” It reminds me of the members of congress who have been in trouble for criminal behavior in recent years — they each, despite overwhelming evidence of guilt, attempted to distract from the substance of the case against them by condemning their prosecution as partisan politic. If condeming the source of the information were the trump card, we might as well forget any hope for the rule of law.
The issue here isn't who filed the complaint. The issue is whether there is substance to the complaint and the ONLY way that anyone will know the answer to that is to let the investigation move forward. Let the investigation move forward. Let the facts fall where they may. Let those who are without guilt be vindicated. Let those with guilt be condemned to an appropriate sanction.
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 1:27 am
Unfortunately this seems to be quite commonplace although this case probably stands out due to the large nature of the church. With the rise of the Bush administration, that purported to be Christian while doing the exact opposite of anything of such nature, some televangelists and “Christian” leaders got power hungry, disregarded the teachings of Christ and embezzled money from their institutions, as well as supported “conservative” candidates. That is of course illegal and should be exposed.
If Hammond is guilty, he needs to be sentenced for any crimes committed, as he is NOT above the law, and the church needs to pay financially for its misdeeds.
Brief aside, I would highly recomment David Ray Griffin's “Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11″ as required reading for Christians.
Also for a satirical take on the Haggard scandal:
Evangelist tired of insisting he's not gay
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 11:30 am
As I was saying… Monsieur LeProf, Concerned Member and Robert;
Unfortunately your responses all validate my first paragraph-it sure sounds as though each one of you has already tried, judged and condemned Rev. Hammond with nothing more to go on than unfounded accusations.
I am not saying that misdeeds-if there are any-should go unpunished. I am saying that you sound like you're ready to string him up without hearing a shred of solid evidence.
And how has Michelle Bachmann lined her pockets? She's only been in national office for a month!?
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 4:05 pm
Tried and Convicted? Not Hardly I am not sure how you reach the conclusion that those who demand an open and transparent investigation have somehow already tried and convicted the Reverend. If you follow the thread, you will see that my concern is that the allegation should be investigated thoroughly and independently. There are facts to support the call for further inquiry.
There is a history among some Church leaders who have wronged their congregation and history raises an alarm when we see facts on the surface that MIGHT be evidence of wrongdoing. THe fact that there is not conclusive proof at this stage, and perhaps not even strong evidence, does not negate the need for investigation. Virtually every investigation, those that result in convictions as well as those that result in acquittal, start with allegations — often from biased sources with less than pristine motivations. No, I am not saying he is guilty or innocent. I am just saying that something smells and I hope that there will be enough inertia here to see if it is dead rat or quality aged cheese.
Comment posted February 9, 2007 @ 4:26 pm
You're right Concerned Member, I apologize. Rereading your post, I agree I should not have lumped you in with the guilty-as-soon-as-charged posters.
Comment posted February 10, 2007 @ 3:55 am
Response on live tv? Maybe we'll get Hammond's response on his live TV broadcast (Chan 11 – 10am). I've seen too many times things taken out of context and twisted. Not sure if he'll use the platform to respond to these allegations, but would be interesting to check it out. Right now, it appears one-sided…
Comment posted February 10, 2007 @ 11:26 am
Supposedly Pastor Mac will address the comments this weekend http://www.lwcc.org/HOME/index.cfm
LW @ Duluth/Superior
LW @ Eau Claire
LW @ 3 Degrees
Ministry Links
Mac Hammond Ministries
Winner's Minute
Lynne Hammond
Living Word Bible Institute Session III Jan 30 – Mar 20
Stewardship Week with Rodney Howard-Browne Feb 13 – Feb 18
Winner's Luncheon – March 2007 Mar 07
Pastor Mac will address many of the recent articles and allegations circulated in the media during the services this weekend. Also, the following is our public statement on these matters:
Living Word Christian Center has a long history of making every effort to conduct the financial affairs of the church with integrity and candor. It is standard procedure for all appropriate contracts and financial transactions to be reviewed by our law firm (Faegre and Benson), audited by an independent accounting firm (Ernestvedt and Christensen), and approved by our board.
Every effort is made, and will continue to be made, to completely comply with and diligently follow all applicable legal standards established by the IRS and the State of Minnesota for the conduct of non-profit organizations.
Living Word and those outside professionals involved in the conduct of our financial affairs remain confident any fair review of our dealings will reveal the validity of our effort to consistently be an accountable and honest ministry before God, our congregation, and our community.
EY: Services on webcast at 5:00 and 7:00 Saturday and 9:00 and 11:00 Sunday.
Comment posted February 10, 2007 @ 11:35 am
It was prophesied Why is it that supposed Christians don't seem to read their Bible so that they can recognize the warning Jesus, Paul and others gave us to identify false Christians? Take a look at these scriptures:
Acts 20:29 “I know that after my going away oppressive wolves will enter in among YOU and will not treat the flock with tenderness, 30 and from among YOU yourselves men will rise and speak twisted things to draw away the disciples after themselves.
Comment posted February 10, 2007 @ 4:37 pm
Recommend you watch… I watched the Living Word broadcast, and he did indeed address each and every one of the allegations. Instead of the expected “fall” of another TV evangelist (by many who have made premature judgments based on incomplete information), he very clearly articulated the many inaccuracies in these reports. After seeing the service, I personally don't believe he is doing anything illegal or even immoral. I recommend before casting any more dispersions on a good man, that you hear his side of this story. It's only fair.
Comment posted February 11, 2007 @ 2:56 am
agreed I attempted to watch his 5 pm, however I could not get in via webcast. We will have a reporter covering his service today from one of his satellite churches to ensure we can report his side as well.
Comment posted February 11, 2007 @ 5:39 am
I watched and was troubled by the flock's blindness. I am also no longer a believer in Christianity….But
Amen to you brother!! Mac Hammond has perverted Christianity for monetary gain. It is sad to see a congregation so asleep and blind that they allow themselves to be ministered to by such a hypocrite. Just today, after an expose in the Minneapolis Star Tribune he spent the hour on TV, squirming under the scrutiny. Trying to justify a life lived for money and excess while hiding behind bible verses. Sick, sick, sick. His authority does not come from God, but from the money generated by those who
allow themselves to be deceived. Jesus did not need expensive cars, motorcycles, planes, multiple homes, and expensive clothes to preach his message. Mac Hammond is a worldly, materialistic, phoney whom Jesus would not approve of. I dare say Jesus would have opposed such philosophy.
Comment posted February 11, 2007 @ 3:25 pm
I suppose a tithe… If Mac required his standard 10-15% of your weekly income tithe today, you must have really felt ripped off….. Nothing like giving all your disposable income to the fallacy of some guy who “talks to God” but to have to then listen to somebody who actually is just stealing your money for his own personal gain. Somehow, I have to belive God would say something, “If one were meant to fly, I would have given him (her, let's just say God was a step behind the times) wings”…….I guess that meant Mac needed TWO planes, not just one right. He didn't get the wings, so he bought two pair instead of just the stock standard one….
I love Mac's chruch. He does Breezy Point ceremonies…You know the type, the one where you go to a wedding and he spends 45 minutes trying to sell you his ministry and for that, you get a five minute wedding ceremony. Make no mistake….it is ALL ABOUT MAC. After all, he talks to God…..along with athletes who win the championship and conservative Republicans who win elections. God speaks to no one else…….
BTW: Mac's “endorsement” and Bachman's winning of the election was a blessing in disguise, more proof that “God” isn't Republican…..What more can you ask for than a moron who can't keep her hands off him (see the State of the Union) and is incapable of actually “working” with the President (she's so in awe of Bush she probaby needs to change her panties every time she sees of a picture of him…..Guess “God” couldn't cure her of lusting after another man besides her husband….). All in all, Bachman will be the billboard Republican in 2008 as to why the country should vote Democrat. It isn't a question as to who “God” wants to win……it is a question as to who is at least remotely capable of actually doing the work of the people…….Clearly, Mac has NO IDEA as to what that is…..I'm sure he can fly somewhere though in one of his TWO planes to figure it out……
I'm done……….GOD wants me to go see “The DeParted”…….God tells me he loves Jack Nicholson……Especially that movie where Jack quoted him and said “YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH”……….and yes, God loves me even though I wouldn't give Mac Hammond a dime (bag)……
BTW: You
Comment posted February 12, 2007 @ 9:15 am
Re: shooting the messenger Excellent post.
Comment posted February 12, 2007 @ 9:58 am
Yeah I watched it…. and he hoodwinked each member of the congregation as usual. Actually I cannot say he did that because the congregation actually gave him a standing ovation even before he started. Poor “Pastor Mac” was almost moved to tears.
But seriously, this was a classic demonstration of deceit in the modern day Christian church. It is the usual story…charismatic leader draws members in with the promise of prosperity as long as they bring their tithes into the church. Well after years of living a lie, it becomes very difficult to face the truth even if it is so blatantly obvious. How do you think Jim Jones got men and women to kill their own children? So please pray for these people. They are truly lost.
Now I have been to LWCC several times (on my wife's insistence) and I will say it once again. He is a businessman masquerading as a pastor. Your money (including the amounts drawn on your credit cards) will fulfill his failed attempts at business. Worse than that he breaks practically every principle Jesus Christ has taught us. So you will lose financially and spiritually.
So please wipe the smudge of your glasses and find a good bible based church. Jesus Christ warned us of people like Mac Hammond so I could care less of the results of an IRS inquiry.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment