<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dirty money: Tracking the political contributions of Tom Petters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/12340/dirty-money-tracking-the-political-contributions-of-tom-petters/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/12340/dirty-money-tracking-the-political-contributions-of-tom-petters</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Demko</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/12340/dirty-money-tracking-the-political-contributions-of-tom-petters/comment-page-1#comment-13868</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Demko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=12340#comment-13868</guid>
		<description>If my facts are off, please provide evidence to the contrary. I&#039;m going on the campaign contribution database maintained by the Center for Responsive Politics, as cited above. Admittedly the contribution picture for Coleman is a bit bizarre. According to CRP, Petters has given Coleman a total of $7,700 this election cycle, but $6,100 of that was returned by the campaign. Usually that happens when someone exceeds the campaign contribution limits, but in this instance that wouldn&#039;t appear to be the case since Petters has not hit the $4,600 max for primary and general election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my facts are off, please provide evidence to the contrary. I&#8217;m going on the campaign contribution database maintained by the Center for Responsive Politics, as cited above. Admittedly the contribution picture for Coleman is a bit bizarre. According to CRP, Petters has given Coleman a total of $7,700 this election cycle, but $6,100 of that was returned by the campaign. Usually that happens when someone exceeds the campaign contribution limits, but in this instance that wouldn&#8217;t appear to be the case since Petters has not hit the $4,600 max for primary and general election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Robert</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/12340/dirty-money-tracking-the-political-contributions-of-tom-petters/comment-page-1#comment-13864</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=12340#comment-13864</guid>
		<description>The facts on Norm Coleman in the story is off.  You state Norm got ($1,600) this election cycle, but he got a lot more, and you missed the soft money on Norm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The facts on Norm Coleman in the story is off.  You state Norm got ($1,600) this election cycle, but he got a lot more, and you missed the soft money on Norm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
