Comments on: Law Firm Demands CREW Remove Financial Documents from Web Site; CREW Refuses

By: Monsieur le Prof

Monsieur le Prof — Sun, 11 Feb 2007 04:38:11 +0000

And you forgot "enemy of freedom of information and freedom of speech."

Although in defending the bible-banging swindlers as such, his anti-constitutional stance doesn't surprise me.

Reality got you down? Read the La Rochelle Times

By: davidvmccoy

davidvmccoy — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:21:03 +0000

Not that it deserves a response, but... On what evidence do you base your charge?

(Not that I'm a champion, thank you, but the swindler part)

By: The Feal McCoy

The Feal McCoy — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:16:43 +0000

David V McCoy, champion of multimillion-dollar God-invoking swindlers!

By: davidvmccoy

davidvmccoy — Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:18:40 +0000

Elastic ethics How is it that CREW's ethics are so elastic?

When there is any suspected wrongdoing (of political foes) the cry goes out for a federal investigation.

But it's fine for them to publicly display confidential financial documents (of political foes).

They play extremely loose with the facts, too. The headline on their website claims "LWCC tries to hide documents from public view". However the cease and desist order is clearly from the firm representing the financial group, not LWCC. These people are lawyers, they know perfectly well that that headline is an outright LIE.

By: p.s.

p.s. — Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:59:16 +0000

Our cue Such takedown orders always seem to spawn increased downloads (and mirror sites) of offending documents. Hint, hint.

By: p.s.

p.s. — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Our cue Such takedown orders always seem to spawn increased downloads (and mirror sites) of offending documents. Hint, hint.

By: davidvmccoy

davidvmccoy — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Elastic ethics How is it that CREW’s ethics are so elastic?

When there is any suspected wrongdoing (of political foes) the cry goes out for a federal investigation.

But it’s fine for them to publicly display confidential financial documents (of political foes).

They play extremely loose with the facts, too. The headline on their website claims “LWCC tries to hide documents from public view”. However the cease and desist order is clearly from the firm representing the financial group, not LWCC. These people are lawyers, they know perfectly well that that headline is an outright LIE.

By: The Feal McCoy

The Feal McCoy — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

David V McCoy, champion of multimillion-dollar God-invoking swindlers!

By: davidvmccoy

davidvmccoy — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Not that it deserves a response, but… On what evidence do you base your charge?
(Not that I’m a champion, thank you, but the swindler part)

By: Monsieur le Prof

Monsieur le Prof — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

And you forgot "enemy of freedom of information and freedom of speech."

Although in defending the bible-banging swindlers as such, his anti-constitutional stance doesn't surprise me.

Reality got you down? Read the La Rochelle Times