Republican Congresswoman Michele Bachmann was quick to try to distance herself from ex-con campaign contributor Frank Vennes Jr. when his alleged involvement in the multibillion-dollar Tom Petters financial fraud scandal became public recently. But she showed little hesitation in showering praise on the convicted money-launderer and cocaine-and-gun trafficker a year ago in her letter of recommendation to grant Vennes–who, along with his wife, is among the most generous individual donors to Bachmann’s campaigns–a presidential pardon.
In a letter to the Office of Pardon Attorney dated Dec. 10, 2007, that I obtained yesterday (PDF), Bachmann declared that “granting a pardon to Mr. Vennes is good for society. Mr. Vennes is truly a unique man in that he is not asking for a pardon that he may achieve personal success. By the grace of God, that has been done.”
God, however, may have had a little help from Petters. According to a federal search warrant affidavit used to search Vennes’ Minnetonka home Sept. 24, Vennes hauled in more than $28 million in commissions for his alleged role in luring five investors to pony up $1.2 billion in Petters’ alleged giant Ponzi scheme. Vennes has not yet been charged in the alleged caper.
Bachmann cited Vennes’ reported work with charitable organizations as justification for a pardon for the crimes he committed. Vennes pleaded guilty and no contest in 1987 to federal charges of money laundering, cocaine distribution and illegal firearms sales. He was sentenced to five years in prison, which he served at Sandstone Federal Correctional Institution in Sandstone, Minn.
Bachmann wrote:
“As a U.S. Representative, I am confident of Mr. Vennes’ successful rehabilitation and that a pardon will be good for the neediest of society. Mr. Vennes is seeking a pardon so that he may be further used to help others. As I know from personal experience, Mr. Vennes has used his business position and success to fund hundreds of nonprofit organizations dedicated to helping the neediest in our society. The Fidelis Foundation, backed by Mr. Vennes, has directed over $10.7 million in total gifts in the last three years, and the Fidelis Foundation has ranked #6, #9 and #7 as the largest grant-making foundation in Minnesota over the past three years.”
The Fidelis Foundation is a Plymouth, Minn.-based nonprofit organization “organized to assist Christians in discerning, clarifying and implementing God’s call and direction in their life,” according to the group’s tax filings. Its chairman is G. Craig Howse, Vennes’ lawyer, and the organization leases office space from Howse for $1,300 a month.
Howse has donated $5,000 to Bachmann’s campaign committee since 2007.
Bachmann notes in her letter that Vennes needs a pardon “so he can help more people than he does. Despite his success, Mr. Vennes still encounters the barriers of his past and especially in the area of finance loan documents. This hinders his ability to expand his business which places limits on the support to the neediest in society … a pardon would release the weights of the past that serve no purpose, as Mr. Vennes has stated his desire to help so many more.”
It’s still not clear why Bachmann used her congressional status to try to leverage a presidential pardon for someone who does not even live in her congressional district. At this point, the only apparent connection between Vennes and Bachmann as a congressperson is the $27,400 Vennes and his wife, Kimberly, have donated to Bachmann’s campaign funds since 2005, making the couple among Bachmann’s largest individual contributors. Vennes’ brother and his wife, Greg and Stephanie Vennes, have donated an additional $8,400 to Bachmann since 2005.
It’s also not known whether Bachmann intends to return or donate to charity any or all of the campaign contributions received from the Vennes. Other politicians or candidates who have received campaign donations tainted by the Petters scandal — including Bachmann’s 6th District Democratic opponent, Elwyn Tinklenberg — have done so.
Further clarification on these and other points regarding Bachmann’s relationship with Frank Vennes Jr. has been requested from the congresswoman’s office.














14 Comments »
Comment posted October 10, 2008 @ 10:22 am
WCCO reported that Tom Petters is recorded on September 8, 2008 as saying one investor did not know that the entire scheme was a hoax. He joked that it made him believe there may be “divine intervention”. Frank Vennes was always sharing the gospel with these men. He has NOT been arrested, or accused of any crime. Unlike Petters, Vennes donations to charity were made in secret. One can only assume that is because his motive was different than Petters – not for his own recognition or to gain favor with the community. Think about it. What if Vennes REALLY had reformed himself? How unfair would it be to falsely accuse him after what he overcame? I would hope any thinking person would be careful to wait for evidence of guilt and not make false accusations. If someone did hurt someone who was innocent and smear his name, I would find him or her a lot more guilty of a crime.
Comment posted October 10, 2008 @ 10:28 am
Why wouldn’t she want to distance herself as quickly and completely as possible from this con-artist and his associates. Clearly she is just another in an ever increasing list of individuals that have been duped by well polished criminals and sociopaths.
Comment posted October 10, 2008 @ 11:48 am
Let us NOT pardon Michele Bachmann. The RNC is pouring money in to try and save her. Bachmann does NOT represent MN06 and has made Minnesota a laughing stock with her Neocon Adoration of George W Bush, the worst president in History
PLEASE support Tink, he’s a good guy and will represent MN06.
http://www.tinklenberg08.com/
And if you are a non Neocon Republican seeking an alternative, support Republican Aubrey Immelman in a write-in campaign. http://www.immelman.us/
Comment posted October 10, 2008 @ 12:53 pm
What does Bachmann need pardoning from? Like was already stated, these are alleged involvements we are talking about here. If you are going to throw Bachmann under the bus for pardoning someone who looked like a good person and then turned out to be a repeat criminal. You should at least wait until the verdict is out.
To those that lean to the left and see this as another reason why republicans are all evil. I suggest you look closely and objectively at Obama and William Aires.
Comment posted October 10, 2008 @ 1:06 pm
What some of you commenters are conveniently forgetting is that it was Michele Bachmann who threw her pal Frank Vennes Jr. under the bus before he’s even been charged when she withdrew her letter of recommendation for a pardon based solely on his house being raided. Bachmann did a 180-degree flip-flop on her support for her friend in her withdrawal letter.
“Regrettably, it now appears that I may have too hastily accepted his claims of redemption and I must withdraw my previous letter,” Bachmann stated in her letter withdrawing her support of Vennes.
Perhaps Rep. Bachmann knows something about Mr. Vennes’ business dealings and/or his presumption of innocence that we don’t. Stay tuned.
Comment posted October 10, 2008 @ 1:25 pm
She learned how to do this from Bill Clinton.
Comment posted October 10, 2008 @ 2:34 pm
From the Strib… what was found at the Vennes home by the Feds:
Last week, agents with the FBI, IRS criminal investigative division and U.S. Postal Inspection Service seized scores of documents, computers and records from Vennes’ home — including checkbooks from one of the charities he had sponsored.
From a basement vault, agents took boxes and buckets of silver and gold coins, trays of jewelry, five stacks of $100 bills, boxes of gem stones, silver plates and Rolex watches. Agents also seized diamond rings and numerous paintings, including dozens with religious themes, such as the raising of Lazarus from the dead.
Comment posted October 10, 2008 @ 3:10 pm
Very relevant Mr. Avidor, he sounds MAINSTREAM just like “Hot for God” Bachmann.
Hey Nate, wasn’t Obama about 8 when that happened? About when McCain was trying to pressure the Keating5 S&Ls that had Cindy McCain’s clear conflict of interest $$Millions? Relevant.
Comment posted October 11, 2008 @ 10:27 am
It is amazing to me that most everyone is quick judge before any evidence is shown in a court of law. But then again that is Man’s nature. Most likely no one who has posted replies to this article has even met Frank Vennes. Frank has touched more lives in a positive way in the last few years than most people do in a life time. How do I know? Because I’m one of those people. Even in the worst case, I will always be thankful to God for Frank’s generous heart.
Comment posted October 11, 2008 @ 11:36 am
Karl’s point here is right even if it is not exactly pertinent to the issues of the campaign. Bachmann has kept a tight lid over anything that would interfere with the persona she seeks to project to to the public. While a few of us see her for the liar, bigot and nut job she really is, the media and many voters in the Sixth see a hard working devout Christian mom who raised 23 foster children and who courageously stands up for what she believes. That would be consistent with the person who wrote an apparently heartfelt letter of support for Frank Vennes’s pardon.
Now, with the Petters indictment forthcoming and Vennes himself thrown into the middle of a lawsuit accused of being a tool of Petters by some of the Christian charities he is involved with, Bachmann revokes her support of Vennes. Vennes has not been charged with anything. What has changed since Bachmann wrote her letter of support? One thing is that Bachmann is in the middle of a political campaign where her carefully burnished image is under scrutiny. So what if a truly reformed and Christian man is not given a pardon if by disassociating myself from him, I Michele Bachmann, can get re-elected?
“Then a servant girl,seeing him the firelight, stared at him and said, “This man also was with him.” But he denied it, saying, “Woman, I do not know him.” ….” Luke 22:56-62.
Comment posted October 13, 2008 @ 1:37 pm
Off the ALWAYS interesting DumpBachmannBlog Today…
“DB reader Wellstone’s Ghost left this comment:
Frank Vennes Jr: ” Knock Knock”
Michele Bachmann: “Who’s There?”
Frank: “Michele, it’s me Brother Frank Jr”
Michele: “Mr. Vennes, I am HOT for God”
Frank: “Michele, EVERYBODY knows that”
Michele: “I am also a foster mother of 23″
Frank: “Michele, why have you betrayed me?”
MB: “Did you bring me an offering?”
FV: “I brought you some pink gloves”.
MB: “Mmm, they do what they r supposed 2″
FV: “Michele why have you betrayed me?”
MB: “Pastor Quack says you are not a winner”
FV: KNOCK KNOCK is anyone ELSE down there?”
Comment posted October 15, 2008 @ 8:49 am
“”Hey Nate, wasn’t Obama about 8 when that happened?”"
What does that have to do with anything?
Was he 8 when his political career was launched in the living room of an arrogant unrepentant terrorist?
Speaking of throwing people under the bus, Obama was quick to throw Acorn under the bus
Comment posted October 17, 2008 @ 9:39 pm
AYERS is a non-issue——Bachman learned from the master CROOK
John McCain and Charles Keating—-’HOW TO SWINDLE INNOCENT
SENIORS FROM THEIR LIFE SAVINGS AND PENSIONS’ 101.
That’s about as far as McCain got with his education.
AND Bachman needs a history lesson as to why AMERICANS began to
question OUR GOVERNMENT decades ago!
Comment posted October 20, 2008 @ 11:25 am
Ayers is indeed a non-issue- I assume from the reactions across the country that if those who think this IS an issue of substance had decided to pursue politics and community improvement as a career, and served on a charitable education reform board where you found someone else working whose views and past actions you didn’t agree with, that you would say “if THAT guy is helping kids than I WON’T!”
If you are so concerned about un-American associates of the candidates, why don’t you poke around a little into the Palins and the AIP? You know, that little group of people who want “the US out of Alaska,” the one that Todd Palin belonged to for 7 years (I think he stopped paying dues in 2002), and the one which Sarah told, this past April, to “keep up the good work.” That’s on video too, btw. These aren’t tenuous connections to people who did un-American things 40 years ago, it’s direct connections to people who proudly espouse un-American behavior, TODAY. Talk about an appalling lack of curiosity by the media…
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment