While the Minnesota Independent and The UpTake were barred entry from Sen. Norm Coleman’s “press availability” today, Star Tribune columnist Nick Coleman made it inside and gave The UpTake’s Chuck Olsen first word about what went on. Sen. Coleman said he’ll no longer run negative attack ads, but the topic of who’s buying his suits didn’t come up in questioning.
Asked about independent media being kicked out of today’s press conference, he said, “It’s interesting that politicians and public officials may resent these citizen journalists and self-described journalists. … I don’t really get the distinction that was being made, except that politicians on the defensive in a time of crisis like this may just want to make it as simple as possible and cut out the people they feel are ‘partisan.’ But that’s a two-edged sword because a lot of the politicians and public officials may have their own partisan citizen journalists and bloggers who are taking their side. … I guess once you do that, then it’s fair game.”













4 Comments »
Comment posted October 10, 2008 @ 12:51 pm
Just a suggestion, so you’ll be taken more seriously: STOP SHOOTING VIDEO ON YOUR IPHONE. Seriously. Buy a camera on craigslist, and get an intern to hold a fake boom mic…
Comment posted October 11, 2008 @ 1:24 am
Publiuuus: We shoot plenty of video with real video cameras. The reason we sometimes use iPhones, and are taken seriously, is because iPhones let us do *live* video very quickly and easily. This Nick Coleman interview was done simultaneously on both iPhone and a high def camera. You’re seeing it now because the live vid is available immediately, whereas I just got home and haven’t yet captured/edited/uploaded the high def version.
Comment posted October 11, 2008 @ 11:31 am
Chuck, but was an interview with Nick really that urgently breaking news that it had to suffer from iPhone production values? I mean, I can see shooting iPhone video from the RNC when something crazy and unexpected was happening, and I think I saw your iPhone video from inside Mile High before the DNC, which was personal and exciting, but I think you could use “real” cameras as both a way to increase your being perceived as a legitimate news source, as well as increasing production values. I mean, even I take it a little less seriously when I’m looking at someone’s chest as you interview them. I do enjoy the work you guys do. I just wanted to make the point that the equipment can be part of the stylistic narrative, and effect perceptions of “validity”, which is what this article was originally about.
Comment posted October 11, 2008 @ 6:39 pm
Oh please. “… equipment can be part of the stylistic narrative….” What does that even mean?
Has no one noticed that Strib columnist Nick Coleman just called for the licensing of journalists?
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment