Future earnings: Unemployment expected to climb to 7.8 percent

By Molly Priesmeyer
Wednesday, October 22, 2008 at 9:38 am

There’s the old adage that things will get worse before they get better, or that something must hit rock bottom before bouncing back. And pundits and economists and analysts have been sounding the alarm bell for months: The economic downturn is only in Stage 1 collapse. On Tuesday, chief economist of the Mortgage Bankers Association Jay Brinkman warned industry folks that the mortgage crisis could last well beyond 2009, and added that the MBA is forecasting unemployment will rise to 7.8 percent by early 2010 before more jobs are added.

In Minnesota, where the unemployment rate currently hovers at 5.7 percent (the country is currently at 6.0 percent), nearly 30,000 jobs are expected to disappear in the next year, according to a Star Tribune story about the latest employment forecast by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Security. That means, according to the Strib, that over the next year the number of additional people looking for jobs will total 60,000, or the equivalent of the population of Burnsville.

The silver (or is it the tin?) lining in all of these dark clouds? At least it won’t be like 1982, when Minnesota’s workforce was reduced by 6 percent. That’s the year Reagan and Bush One were in the White House, unemployment rose to 7.6 percent, and a new home cost only about $83,900. Suddenly this is all sounding eerily familiar.

Categories & Tags: Economy/Finance| |

Comments

2 Comments

matt
Comment posted October 22, 2008 @ 11:12 am

Despite the layoff news, I see thousands of high paying jobs posted on employment sites –

http://www.linkedin.com (networking for professionals)
http://www.indeed.com (aggregated listings)
http://www.realmatch.com (jobs matched to your skills)

Those laid off will find new jobs…maybe better ones!


ultraplops@yahoo.com
Comment posted October 23, 2008 @ 9:21 pm

The primary reason unemployment rose under the middle of Reagans presidency was because the fed raised the funds rate in order to get inflation under control and this caused an economic slow down.

Unfortunately for us,

inflation is not being kept in check in our current economy.

congress and the bush administration is spending like a little kid at a Toys R US shopping spree sinking us further into debt,

Congress is causing energy supply issues and forcing higher cost solutions.

Democrats want to increase Union power and let them put a stranglehold on whatever industry they infest.

Democrats want to raise taxes and enact many new spending programs.

Many Republicans are jumping on the Democrat spending-taxing bandwagon.

All of this when we are in the middle of an economic crisis. Personally I am not optomistic about our future regardless of who wins because we have arguably the worst congress in history. We are more likely to see hyperinflation and a significant rise in unemployment, the opposite of the Reagan economic boom.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.