Comments on: Second lawsuit claims $75,000 intended for Coleman http://minnesotaindependent.com/15734/second-lawsuit-claims-coleman-fraudulently-recieved-75000 News. Politics. Media. Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: No one special http://minnesotaindependent.com/15734/second-lawsuit-claims-coleman-fraudulently-recieved-75000/comment-page-1#comment-17196 No one special Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:52:01 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=15734#comment-17196 @"Wordsmith": Refute: 1. To prove to be false or erroneous; overthrow by argument or proof: refute testimony. 2. To deny the accuracy or truth of: refuted the results of the poll. From Answers.com @”Wordsmith”:
Refute:
1. To prove to be false or erroneous; overthrow by argument or proof: refute testimony.
2. To deny the accuracy or truth of: refuted the results of the poll.

From Answers.com

]]> By: Aldo Gutierrez http://minnesotaindependent.com/15734/second-lawsuit-claims-coleman-fraudulently-recieved-75000/comment-page-1#comment-17129 Aldo Gutierrez Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:31:31 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=15734#comment-17129 Lazercat hits it right on the head. Not only has Coleman always run these 11th hour scams, he's perfected them. Only he could coordinate a lawsuit and it's timing so well. This is an old suit. He and his party knew about it for months and supposedly kept is under wraps as it was being settled out of court. Only Coleman could decide that suddenly on Friday he would not agree to the out-of-court terms and poof; instant lawsuit. He KNEW it was coming because only he could orchestrate it. Then, with a limited news cycle, make sure he adds in all the sadness and bring on all the Minnesota voters who respond very strongly to those they feel are be attacked. Norm knows this as it has never failed him. Icky. Lazercat hits it right on the head. Not only has Coleman always run these 11th hour scams, he’s perfected them. Only he could coordinate a lawsuit and it’s timing so well. This is an old suit. He and his party knew about it for months and supposedly kept is under wraps as it was being settled out of court. Only Coleman could decide that suddenly on Friday he would not agree to the out-of-court terms and poof; instant lawsuit. He KNEW it was coming because only he could orchestrate it. Then, with a limited news cycle, make sure he adds in all the sadness and bring on all the Minnesota voters who respond very strongly to those they feel are be attacked. Norm knows this as it has never failed him. Icky.

]]> By: Paul Demko http://minnesotaindependent.com/15734/second-lawsuit-claims-coleman-fraudulently-recieved-75000/comment-page-1#comment-16566 Paul Demko Sat, 01 Nov 2008 17:14:29 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=15734#comment-16566 Wordsmith makes a valid point. I'm going to tweak. Thanks. Wordsmith makes a valid point. I’m going to tweak. Thanks.

]]> By: Lazercat http://minnesotaindependent.com/15734/second-lawsuit-claims-coleman-fraudulently-recieved-75000/comment-page-1#comment-16565 Lazercat Sat, 01 Nov 2008 17:06:04 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=15734#comment-16565 The really great part is that every election Norm Coleman throws in a 11th hour lawsuit on his opponent and then after the election he withdraws it. Every election. Now, he states this is an 11th hour lawsuit from a democrat. It is not it was filed by a pro-republican CEO who finances Republican Candidates. Now, that deserves Cobert's alpha-dog trophy. The really great part is that every election Norm Coleman throws in a 11th hour lawsuit on his opponent and then after the election he withdraws it. Every election. Now, he states this is an 11th hour lawsuit from a democrat. It is not it was filed by a pro-republican CEO who finances Republican Candidates. Now, that deserves Cobert’s alpha-dog trophy.

]]> By: Wordsmith http://minnesotaindependent.com/15734/second-lawsuit-claims-coleman-fraudulently-recieved-75000/comment-page-1#comment-16557 Wordsmith Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:11:59 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=15734#comment-16557 Paul, you write that "Sen. Coleman has refuted the allegation..." That's incorrect. The verb "Refute" means to prove that a statement is false. "Rebut" means to provide opposing arguments. The senator certainly made a rebuttal, but he didn't prove anything. Paul, you write that “Sen. Coleman has refuted the allegation…” That’s incorrect. The verb “Refute” means to prove that a statement is false. “Rebut” means to provide opposing arguments. The senator certainly made a rebuttal, but he didn’t prove anything.

]]> By: Bonnie http://minnesotaindependent.com/15734/second-lawsuit-claims-coleman-fraudulently-recieved-75000/comment-page-1#comment-16550 Bonnie Sat, 01 Nov 2008 13:49:07 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=15734#comment-16550 Please correct spelling of Received in headline... Please correct spelling of Received in headline…

]]>