Comments on: Franken attorney: ‘Odds are something went wrong’

By: David

David — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:11:56 +0000

What went wrong is Franken. His own mother voted for Coleman (and with good reason).

By: ccyr

ccyr — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:47:46 +0000

The odds are that because we lost something was wrong with the game. Those are the words of people that we call sore losers. Every candidate that is ahead claims victory and says a recount is a waste of time and money. Every candidate that is behind says that the recount is automatic and provided by law. But to say that just because you lost, something must be wrong, is sore loser talk.

By: Dick

Dick — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:28:50 +0000

Norm Coleman has asked that there not be a recount, to save the state money. I can’t agree more. Norm, we are all awaiting your gracious concession speech.

By: Naplesgal

Naplesgal — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 03:18:00 +0000

Yah…I can’t believe anyone in their right mind would vote for
Bachmann. I think she should be the first one to be investigated
by Congress for being “UNAMERICAN”. WHAT A PHONEY, TWO FACED B—H.

By: Carol

Carol — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:35:36 +0000

SEND MONEY TO AL AT HIS WEBSITE FOR HIS DEFENSE ACCOUNT! DO IT NOW!!!

WE NEED TO STOP STOLEN ELECTIONS IN MINNESOTA!!

NO ONE CAN REALLY BELIEVE WE ELECTED MICHELLE BACHMANN, COLEMAN AND PAWLENTY!!!

COME ON!!!! THEY AREN’T RIGHT FOR OUR BLUE STATE VOTERS!

INVESTIGATE THESE ELECTIONS!!! GO BACK TO 2004!!

MARY KIFFMEYER WAS A REPUBLICAN OPERATIVE, I KNOW IT!!!

By: Tom S

Tom S — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:28:28 +0000

“Exit polls had Franken ahead by double digits in Minneapolis and Saint Paul.”

And that means absolutely nothing. Franken received less than 25% of the votes cast in my precinct.

By: Alex Lester

Alex Lester — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:05:30 +0000

I must have been drunk when I wrote of Minnesota Norm’s smear machine a few comments up.
I should have disclosed the firm as Scott Howell & Co. of Dallas. http://www.scott-howell.com/
They also did spots for W.

By: Alex Lester

Alex Lester — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:29:34 +0000

He may or may not have been drunk, but that doesn’t change the argument: “As many as 6,000 votes which didn’t count in Tuesday’s election for US Senator in Minnesota could count in the upcoming recount.” http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=528866

COUNT BABY COUNT!

By: What?

What? — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:51:03 +0000

“The odds are that something went wrong with respect to counting.”

Did Lillehaug really say that?

Was he drunk?

By: dan steinberg

dan steinberg — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:57:25 +0000

Coleman is insinuating that Franken is being unreasonable and wasteful of taxpayer money because of the recount? Which is required by state law anyway? Unbelievable. Coleman is an ASS. He is ungracious, egotistical and a liar. And dont forget about Colemans phony claim that Franken was behind the texas lawsuit charging him with improper and illegal money transfers via his wife. Somehow, this lawsuit, which was filed by a republican CEO in Texas, is Frankens doing. Colemans story is preposterous.

Republicans and conservatives as usual deny reality and are stubborn till the end. Conservatives elected a convicted felon (sen Stevens). Have fun with that one-idiots.

The ridiculous and childish “conservative movement” is why the US, and the planet, are in such peril. The conservative movement is a movement of ignorance.