In our first post-election installment of the Schultz Report, David Schultz talks about the mixed bag that last night brought for Minnesota Democrats–handing a 10-point margin to Barack Obama on one hand, but failing to net any congressional pickups and falling short of the five-seat increase needed to give the party a 2/3 majority in the Minnesota House.
“For all of those [down-ticket Minnesota] races,” notes Schultz, “you have Democrats coming in on average about 10 points behind where Obama was. It might be simply that the Obama coattails were not coattails at all — that a lot of Obama people may have voted for Barack Obama and nobody else. There’s a little bit of evidence of that occurring, much like 1998 when a lot of people voted for Jesse Ventura and nobody else.
“But a lot of people did vote, and they didn’t necessarily vote straight Democratic lines. So the question is, why, in a year where the Democrats did spectacularly well across the country, why did they so underperform here?”
Listen: David Schultz talks about Obama’s big Minnesota win and its failure to yield congressional seat pickups (13:58)
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.














4 Comments »
Comment posted November 6, 2008 @ 12:36 pm
because many of the state & local Dem candidates were terrible. maybe not as bad as their GOP counterpart, but hardly anyone to get excited about. i know i had to hold my nose to vote for Franken.
Comment posted November 6, 2008 @ 2:25 pm
the people wanted jack nelson pallmeyer.
all dems “won” my district except my man rep ken tschumper. the monster that held the seat for 16 years previous to ken got it back. because of this i am not able to celebrate our obama victory as i should. i campaigned extremely hard for dems.
and another thing. now that it’s all over, i can say i am deeply disappointed in the dfl in strong arming franken in. the people wanted jack.
Comment posted November 6, 2008 @ 5:40 pm
I echo the “poor candidates” comment. Speaking as a member of the youth demographic the Democrats strove to mobilize, I was BARELY able to stomach voting for Tinklenberg. In the Senate election, I voted for Barkley, because I’ll be damned if I’m going to reward the Democratic Party for picking a shithead like Franken to run for Senate. “He’s not Coleman” is not a good enough reason to earn my vote. I don’t vote for people just because I think other people might. I vote my conscience, like all people should. This country would be better off if EVERYONE did that.
Obama won by as much as he did because he was able to appeal to young people and independents. Franken came off as a phony, and Tinklenberg…well, he didn’t really come off as anything at all. That’s why Norm and Michelle “Joe McCarthy is my Co-Pilot” Bachmann are still in office.
If Jesse Ventura had run, I don’t think Coleman OR Franken would have been able to pull out a win. Not that I would’ve necessarily voted for him myself, but I think that any truly strong independent candidate would’ve had a good chance of stealing the seat.
Comment posted November 7, 2008 @ 1:12 am
I’ve met Al Franken. He’s no phony. Frankly BBQ platypus, you haven’t a clue what you’re talking about.
I liked Jack too, and I thought we had two strong choices so it was hard to see either one lose the endorsement. However, for a reality check, Jack also has written books and the Republicans would have picked parts to distort just like Al. Al had higher negatives, but no one had heard of Jack other than DFL activists in Minneapolis. This would have meant Jack was just as vulnerable to defining by the Republicans as Al was. Jack was great at motivating supporters, but Al did well too, and he was able to raise the money to compete. I’m not sure Jack could have. Jack would have had a shot because he seems to have a knack for campaigning, but Al was the stronger candidate.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment