Heard beneath Friday’s hubbub over the vote count in Mountain Iron, Minn., was the advancement of a related Republican argument — that by offering reasons why a recount in the U.S. Senate election contest between Democrat Al Franken and Republican U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman should go forward, Democrats are insulting Minnesota’s election system and its election officials.
What was implicit in U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman’s remarks Wednesday, prominent Republican commentator Sarah Janecek made explicit Friday, first by writing that when Democrats say they want to “ensure votes properly cast are properly counted,” they’re really out to “smear our elections process.” Later she told a public television audience, “I’m pretty sickened by that.” In the meantime, Coleman’s campaign manager applied words like “dubious” and “tainted” to the current canvassing process.
In an article for her Politics in Minnesota Weekly Report, publisher Janecek wrote:
The outsider ethos that has plagued Al Franken since the inception of his candidacy two years ago now manifests itself in an even uglier fashion: casting doubt on Minnesota’s election process. … Franken and the DFL Party are not entitled to, at best, cast doubt on our process, or worse, create chaos. The PR and legal strategy appears to hang on “properly cast votes properly counted.”
Here Janecek cites Franken’s and five other DFLers’ use of the offending phrase, “ensure properly cast votes are properly counted.” She continues:
We’ve talked to a number of rank-and-file election judges (from both parties) this week and they feel insulted. These people volunteer their time year after year to do the Good Neighbor thing at the polls. To smear our elections process is to smear them, they believe.
Later Friday Janecek made one of her frequent appearances on TPT’s weekly “Almanac” show, where she said:
I really dread this entire process. Minnesota — highest voter turnout in the nation. We’re known for our clean elections. And you look at the rhetoric that’s coming from the Franken campaign about improper elections, improper votes cast, and it just — I’m sickened. I think in large part — Secretary Ritchie flagged this earlier — we have good people running our elections. So I’m pretty sickened by that.
This on a day when Coleman’s campaign manager, Cullen Sheehan, said in a press release:
Minnesota has a history of fair and clean elections, and we are committed to ensuring that this election is no different. That is why it is so troubling to us that …statistically dubious and improbable shifts … are overwhelmingly accruing to the benefit of Al Franken. And, as many of these unexplained and improbably vote swings are taking place on the Iron Range, we’re asking that local and state election officials provide us with the necessary data to reassure the public that the canvassing process has not been tainted.
If the Democrats’ phrase “ensure votes properly cast are properly counted” is enough to make Republicans ill, then the Coleman camp’s words — “troubling,” “dubious,” “unexplained,” “improbably” and “tainted” — must have pushed them way beyond Minute Clinic-sick.
The question is whether words — whatever their political stripe, emotional pang or medical impact — will distract Minnesotans and their public officials from seeing the electoral system through a professional and impartial recount process.













14 Comments »
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 12:20 pm
After reading her bit in PIM, the level of respect I have for Janacek went even lower than it already was. Wacky, wacky spin.
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 1:55 pm
Why publish trash. I get tired of the media always countering the truth by giving the ‘other side’, the lie. Doesn’t a newspaper have a conscience to tell the truth. Why would anyone want to subvert the election process, which includes recount on a close ballot? What do the Republicans have to hide? They have been notorious to being dishonest. Look at Nixon, Bush and all the voter registration fraud and dirty tricks on record. The Democrates are just naive. They need to check everywhere a Republican could have gotten his hands on ballots or tampered with voting machines. The’ve been caught before like with Pat Buchannan. This uproar is hiding something. They protest too much. luv
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 1:58 pm
I am a head election judge in an Anoka County precinct and I am not at all insulted by the requirement for a statewide recount. It might feel different if only certain counties or precincts were picked out for a recount, but in an election with < .01% variance a manual recount of every ballot seems like a reasonable precaution.
It is my experience that virtually all election judges are doing their best to ensure that all election laws are followed to the best of our ability, but we don’t dispute the obvious — that neither human officials nor our voting technology are perfect. I suspect that the vote totals for both candidates will go up as a result of a manual recount, simply because there are a certain number of ballots in which the voter’s intent will be obvious to human counters but not to the optical scanner.
I know that some voters are suspicious of elections officials and after the disaster of the 2000 Florida election I try to be understanding of why people feel suspicious. I don’t, however, think that Ms. Janacek is expressing honest concern. This is her usual MO of disingenuously spreading BS when she actually knows better.
I am pleased by the way the Secretary of State has handled himself so far. I encourage everyone to just chill and let the process provided for by our laws be carried out. It will be carefully supervised both by those entrusted by law and by representatives of both parties so there is little opportunity for anything to happen other than a higher degree of certainty.
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 2:49 pm
It is widely known that the ballot tabulators used in the MN election are faulty.
They can have as much as a 10% error rate.
recently in one test 1000 ballots counted on one diebold machine got different results every time.
here’s an early report:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6641
The best solution here, is to have a fair, open recount process. Counts are done by paired teams, with one democrat, and one republican counter in each team. everything is open to public view…
This is why we need 100% hand counted paper ballot elections.
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 4:04 pm
Further, an MIT Professor, Charles Stewart III, has written a brief memo:
http://electionupdates.caltech.edu/?p=2381
He wrote it on the 6th, when we still didn’t know there would be a recount, and when Coleman’s lead was still 336…
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 7:39 pm
Whoever gave her the title “Political Analyst”, or is this a
self-appointed title?
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 9:35 pm
To hell with Sarah Janacek and her “opinions.” She’s been nothing but a Republican party hack since the day her name first appeared in print, despite how ever many sets of sheep’s clothing she tried on. Her comments are “rich”:
“ Franken and the DFL Party are not entitled to, at best, cast doubt on our process, or worse, create chaos.”
Everything I’ve seen, especially including her writings, indicate it is the Coleman campaign and its boosters who have been “cast[ing] doubt on our process, [and] worse, creat[ing] chaos.” They’re a bunch of hypocrites.
I long for the days when the Republican party is once again run by the loyal and respected opposition, rather than the small-minded criminals and nut cases.
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 9:35 pm
Naplesgal: self-appointed.
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 11:10 pm
Sarah J., “political analyst” is, in fact, owner of a GOP public relations firm and a registered lobbyist. She is paid extremely well to trash democrats and has been doing it for too many years on TPT’s Almanac. She’s just doing her job on behalf of the Coleman campaign. I’ve tried ignoring her but she won’t go away.
Comment posted November 8, 2008 @ 11:22 pm
According to the state Campaign Finance Board website, Janacek stopped being a lobbyist earlier this year. I didn’t check the timeline but I presume it was when she took the publisher job at Politics in Minnesota.
Comment posted November 9, 2008 @ 9:08 am
Isn’t it interesting that the Republicans sound like they are against due process (the recount) and against state rights (it is a MN law to recount under .5 percent). The votes will fall where they may.
I am an election judge as well. I want all votes to be counted properly and at this minimal difference, it’s imperative that it be done by hand. The process will start about Nov 19th and take as long as necessary. I think the Republican anger is partially because they were out spent this whole election cycle. Normally it’s the Democrats who are short on cash. . . this time it was the Republicans.
Comment posted November 9, 2008 @ 5:15 pm
This isn’t about spin. It’s a calculated effort to simultaneously cast doubt on the honesty of the recount process, and blame the DFL for casting doubt on the honesty of the eelction process. That’s a long sentence, but the GOP is trying to do something and blame the DFL for doing it at the same time. It’s all about setting up public pressure on elected officials to give in to Coleman in hopes of looking impartial, and to threaten Franken and the DFL with long term damage to their reputations. Just like Coleman claiming victory, it’s their playbook from Florida 2000.
Comment posted November 10, 2008 @ 6:15 am
Janecek, not Janacek. Happens all the time, but still.
Otherwise, great points, Chris.
Comment posted November 10, 2008 @ 7:18 am
Thanks, David. I corrected the spelling.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment