Comments on: Team Coleman jumps on Mark Ritchie MSNBC comment http://minnesotaindependent.com/17333/team-coleman-jumps-on-mark-ritchie-msnbc-comment News. Politics. Media. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:51:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Lazercat http://minnesotaindependent.com/17333/team-coleman-jumps-on-mark-ritchie-msnbc-comment/comment-page-1#comment-17809 Lazercat Thu, 13 Nov 2008 03:46:29 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=17333#comment-17809 These people are holding on to a lost cause. Coleman will be investigated on ethics and money laundering charges, the GOP will pull all posts and if found guilty of ethics violations he will be removed from the Senate. Nasser's war with Iran is on the scrap heap of voter revolt, so no Presidency for him and definitely no Presidency for Coleman. It's over guys, just forget the whole thing. The world has changed. Your time is over. These people are holding on to a lost cause. Coleman will be investigated on ethics and money laundering charges, the GOP will pull all posts and if found guilty of ethics violations he will be removed from the Senate. Nasser’s war with Iran is on the scrap heap of voter revolt, so no Presidency for him and definitely no Presidency for Coleman.

It’s over guys, just forget the whole thing. The world has changed. Your time is over.

]]> By: Leif Utne http://minnesotaindependent.com/17333/team-coleman-jumps-on-mark-ritchie-msnbc-comment/comment-page-1#comment-17791 Leif Utne Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:50:37 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=17333#comment-17791 Looks like that video has been pulled by YouTube. At least it's not loading for me. Looks like that video has been pulled by YouTube. At least it’s not loading for me.

]]> By: Dave http://minnesotaindependent.com/17333/team-coleman-jumps-on-mark-ritchie-msnbc-comment/comment-page-1#comment-17778 Dave Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:42:20 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=17333#comment-17778 although you attribute Ritchie's "their" pronoun as meaning "the Coleman campaign" in brackets, Ritchie never actually stated that it was just the Coleman campaign that his remarks referred to. Looking at the whole context of the interview, he could very easily have meant any campaign's purpose is to win at any price. Ritchie, himself, did not mention Coleman's name...although the questioner did refer to Coleman's statement as to the context of the question. Ritchie went on to talk about how 6 parties ran Senate candidates... although you attribute Ritchie’s “their” pronoun as meaning “the Coleman campaign” in brackets, Ritchie never actually stated that it was just the Coleman campaign that his remarks referred to. Looking at the whole context of the interview, he could very easily have meant any campaign’s purpose is to win at any price. Ritchie, himself, did not mention Coleman’s name…although the questioner did refer to Coleman’s statement as to the context of the question. Ritchie went on to talk about how 6 parties ran Senate candidates…

]]>