Comments on: Coleman Expresses Skepticism on Gonzales Vote

By: Randy

Randy — Fri, 25 May 2007 12:58:28 +0000

No Surprise This is one of those "sun rises in the east this morning" stories. Senator Coleman appears to take a stance contrary to the official position of the White House, but finds reasons not to put his name to a vote backing that stance up. So what else is new?

I used to feel insulted at this kind of posturing, with its implicit assumption that I (and other voters) would be fooled. Now, it's gone on for so long, I don't even notice that it happens anymore (kind of like finding out that Jerry Springer's show is still on).

By: justinph

justinph — Fri, 25 May 2007 09:40:34 +0000

The Colemeleon It would be just like the Colemeleon to express his outrage at something, and then vote the party line in spite of it. What a worthless senator. He cares more about the Republican party than he does the voters of MN that put him there. Hopefully he'll be gone in 2008.

By: justinph

justinph — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

By: Randy

Randy — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

No Surprise This is one of those “sun rises in the east this morning” stories. Senator Coleman appears to take a stance contrary to the official position of the White House, but finds reasons not to put his name to a vote backing that stance up. So what else is new?

I used to feel insulted at this kind of posturing, with its implicit assumption that I (and other voters) would be fooled. Now, it’s gone on for so long, I don’t even notice that it happens anymore (kind of like finding out that Jerry Springer’s show is still on).