Simple math tells us that if the Al Franken forces and the Norm Coleman camp keep ramping up the ballot challenges, they’ll reach a combined total of 1,732 challenged ballots by the end of Minnesota’s U.S. Senate recount. That’s if each campaign continues to increase its number of challenges in the neighborhood of 140 per day, as they did from Day One to Day Two.
(Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie predicts 1,500 challenged ballots, and fivethirtyeight.com’s Nate Silver estimates roughly 1,800. But since every campaign challenger at every recount site represents an independent variable, I think my guess is as good as theirs.)
More complicated math, working with the rate of increase rather than the hard-number jump, suggests the combined total could hit 2,518. That’s if each campaign were to continue to become increasingly picky over the next two days — at the same percentage rate of increase they showed from Day One to Day Two.
For Franken, the day-over-day increase so far is 42 percent, which if repeated on Day Three and Day Four of a projected four-day recount, would lead to a total of 1,233 challenges.
For Coleman, who had a 44 percent increase from Day One to Day Two, the grand total would be 1,285 challenged ballots, if he were to keep increasing his challenged ballots by 44 percent each day. Drilling down, that means he would challenge 373 on Day Three. And on Day Four, Coleman’s daily challenged ballot count would be – hold on to your hat, Nate Silver! – 538.













3 Comments »
Comment posted November 21, 2008 @ 1:15 pm
Seems that Chris is implying that there is actually something sinister about 2,500 ballots being challenged and counted later.
They will get counted in the end if they are valid votes. I don’t see the problem. They are doing 2.9 million ballots by hand. I’m sure they will quickly work through these 2,500 too.
It’s a non-issue.
Comment posted November 21, 2008 @ 2:43 pm
I was actually geeking out here and wasn’t trying to say any particular number of challenges would be sinister. However, the master geek, Nate Silver, sort of says that if you follow the links in this post. I think he has some kind of disclaimer that it’s all legal (a little overbroad since i believe truly frivolous challenges aren’t legal), but he suggests a strategy that could be called sinister is at work: To take out sure-fire Franken votes from the recount’s final total so Coleman’s still ahead going into the Canvassing Board.
Comment posted November 22, 2008 @ 12:28 am
I get it now. It doesn’t have anything to do with the actual results, just the public perception of the results at certain times in the process.
Giving truth to the statement that you can fool some of the people all the time.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment