Drug Czar Ramstad?

By Paul Demko
Wednesday, December 03, 2008 at 11:31 am

Now that the State and Treasury department picks have been officially unveiled, the parlor game of Obama cabinet speculation turns to the less high-profile posts — the people no one hears much about unless it turns up that they’re harboring illegal immigrants in their garage. Almost since election day, retiring Rep. Jim Ramstad’s name has been rumored to be in the mix for Drug Czar (more formally known as the head of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy).

Politico first tapped him as a likely candidate in mid-November. “It’s gratifying to hear Jim’s name being mentioned for drug czar,” Ramstad spokesman Dean Peterson told the publication at the time. “Jim has worked in a bipartisan way for 27 years on anti-drug efforts in Congress and the Minnesota Senate. And as a recovering person, he’s worked every day to help those suffering the ravages of chemical addiction.” The Christian Science Monitor keeps the speculation alive today, mentioning Ramstad as a potential pick in an editorial calling for a greater emphasis on drug treatment.

A possible Ramstad appointment has been warmly received by some who believe it would be a strong statement that addiction should be treated as a mental-health issue. The Republican congressman was influential in helping pass legislation earlier this year that requires health-insurance companies to cover mental and physical maladies equally.

But not everyone is enthusiastic about the notion of Ramstad as the country’s Drug Czar. Advocates of marijuana legalization view him as a staunch opponent of their cause, noting that he’s repeatedly voted against legislation that would have loosened restrictions on the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes.

Advocates of needle-exchange programs also view Ramstad as an antagonist. Writing in the Huffington Post, Maia Szalavitz notes that the Republican legislator has consistently opposed such programs, despite overwhelming evidence of their efficacy in reducing HIV rates. In 1999, for instance, Ramstad voted for a bill that prevented Washington, D.C. from using its own funds to pay for syringe distribution.

Of course, Minnesota Democrats would likely rejoice at a Ramstad appointment. Why? If Gov. Tim Pawlenty opts not to run for a third term, the popular moderate’s name would undoubtedly jump to the top of the list of Republican hopefuls in 2010.

Comments

4 Comments

Greg Willems
Comment posted December 3, 2008 @ 8:35 pm

Alcohol is a drug. So, I should say, “hell hath no furry like a reformed drug addict”. What we need is another hypocrit running the ONDCP. I did mine, but, don’t you do yours. Please, President Elect Obama, contact Judge James P. Gray and ask him to run the ONDCP, if you feel that you must keep the ONDCP. http://www.dailypilot.com/articles/2008/10/05/opinion/dpt-gray100508.txt#simpleblog


Kirk Muse
Comment posted December 10, 2008 @ 7:25 pm

Drug Czar? We don’t need another politician as Drug Czar, we need a Medical Doctor who acknowledges
that drug problems cannot be solved with jails or prisons.


Andrew Tatarsky
Comment posted December 11, 2008 @ 7:33 pm

I am a psychologist with 30 years treating patients with mental health and substance use disorders who, in collaboration with many colleagues, organized the letter opposing Ramstad as a choice for Drug Czar because of his ideological, regressive, non-science based perspectives. In contrast to the statement in the Minnesota Independent that mental health and substance abuse professionals are more favorable to him than public health advocates, our letter of 300 of his crowd, many of whom are leaders in the field, is proof to the contrary. You can view the letter and its signers at http://www.andrewtatarsky.com. We want America’s drug policy to be guided by evidence-based, compassionate treatment for people struggling with substance use problems not the tired old failed one-size-fits all system that sets up failure and despair and leads to escalatations in substance use and increased incarceration. Good science-based treatment rather than incarceration is good for substance users and good for America.


Karen Feyo, M.A. LPC, LADC
Comment posted July 15, 2009 @ 3:18 pm

THis is a request to meet with Rep. Jim Ramstad for a 15 minute meeting. This writer has been an alcohol-drug counselorand (licensed LADC) and also LIcensed Professional Counselor.(providing mental health/addiction recovery.
Have information on evidence based practices service delivery can be more cost effective.
I look forward to hearing from you.
My best
Karen Feyo, M.A.LPC, LADC


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.