During his time in Congress, retiring Republican Rep. Jim Ramstad championed the needs of those experiencing mental illness or chemical addiction, often through the lens of his own experience as a recovering alcoholic. For that reason, his name tops the list of possible appointments by the Obama administration as either drug czar or as the administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). But one earmark by Ramstad could prompt some questions from Senate Democrats during a confirmation hearing if Ramstad is nominated for either position.
Earlier this year, Ramstad sponsored a $235,000 earmark for the Minnesota Teen Challenge (MNTC), an Assemblies of God drug treatment center with a history of controversial therapies and overt religious indoctrination.
MNTC is part of a national network of drug treatment and “discipleship training” centers called Teen Challenge. (Here’s MNTC’s response to this article.)
Teen Challenge programs across the country typically describe themselves in these terms:
“Being a Christian discipleship program, it endeavors to minister to the whole person, helping them to become mentally sound, emotionally balanced, socially adjusted, physically well, and spiritually alive through a relationship with Jesus Christ.”
Teen Challenge’s overt Christian message is extends to outright conversion — at least according to its leaders. During a congressional hearing in May 2001, Congress members challenged the ability of Teen Challenge and other faith-based initiatives to offer government services without overt religiousness. Rep. Mark Souder (R-Ind.) asked Teen Challenge Executive Director John Castellani if the organization hired non-Christians. Castellani said no. When asked if Teen Challenge takes non-Christian clients, Castellani said they did and he then bragged that some Jews who complete Teen Challenge programs become “completed Jews.”
In Minnesota the program requires signing a statement acknowledging the program’s Christian nature:
I will participate in daily devotions, Bible reading, and prayer. I will participate in the Teen Challenge choir which performs Christian songs at weekly church services and special events. I will participate in lecture classes, individualized study courses, group counseling, individual counseling, and other program components that are based on Christian principles. I will attend church services when scheduled. If offered the opportunity to partake in communion or water baptism my participation is voluntary. If I object to the religious nature of this program and its requirements, I will notify the Dean of Students and receive a referral to another program of my choosing.
Despite those voluntary statements, a number of MNTC participants are ordered by the courts to complete the program — or else end up in jail. Just this Monday, a Minnesota judge sentenced a 27-year old Crystal man to MNTC. And dozens of others are sentenced to the faith-based treatment center each year.
Working for MNTC is also difficult for non-Christians, even if the program welcomes non-Christian applicants. The employment application contains this statement:
I understand that MN Teen Challenge is a Christian church ministry affiliated with the Assemblies of God denomination. I understand that should my application be accepted, I will be working in an environment that is decidedly Christian in nature, and I hereby agree to abide by the bylaws, policies, and procedures of Minnesota Teen Challenge. I further understand that although my religious beliefs and practices may differ from those of Minnesota Teen Challenge, I will respect the religious views of MnTC and its leadership. I will refrain from promoting any beliefs or publicly demonstrating any behavior that contradicts the teaching, philosophy, or beliefs of the MnTC program during working hours, or while on MnTC property.
For non-Christian employees at a federally funded program, even leaving the office to privately pray in a vehicle in the parking lot could be grounds for immediate dismissal. For non-traditional families, bringing in pictures of loved ones could be grounds for dismissal. For Catholics, displaying any symbols that disagree with Pentecostalism could get an employee fired.
Know the Truth
MNTC is using its federal funds in Minnesota for a program called “Know the Truth.” The program works in middle schools, high schools and churches to encourage students to abstain from drug use and to help teens and parents talk about tough issues like drug use.
While MNTC has been attacked over the earmark, it contend it hasn’t used the money for religious purposes. The MNTC administration director offers this statement about the Know the Truth program:
Minnesota Teen Challenge is scheduled to receive a direct grant from the federal government to be used exclusively for a non-religious drug and alcohol abuse prevention program. This program contains no religious content whatsoever and has been presented to over 30,000 junior and senior high school students across the state. Minnesota Teen Challenge is aware of, and in agreement with the constitutional restrictions placed on receipt of government funds. We take great care to ensure that all federal money is strictly accounted for and that none of the dollars are ever used for religious purposes.
Know the Truth is one of those gray areas that separation-of-church-and-state advocates watch carefully. While MNTC says religious purpose is scrubbed from the program, the program itself is a referral to the overtly religious drug treatment programs. The name “Know the Truth” is a common theme in evangelical Christianity owing to the New Testament verse John 8:32, “Know the truth and the truth shall make you free.”
The Know the Truth program relies on the life stories of graduates from MNTC’s drug treatment programs, and those stories invariably have overtures of religious awakening as a route to freedom from addiction.
One such Know the Truth night at a Leroy, Minn., church highlighted the stories of Gina, Shaun and Bethany as recounted in the Leroy Independent.
“The bottom came, [Gina] said, when she was in jail for the second or third time and she was told by a person to ‘pray to God, just like you’re talking to me.’ This helped she said because she did need help desperately, and she knew God had heard her plea when her mother called that Gina’s children were being returned to her mother’s home, rather than being adopted out as had been the plan,” it read. “Shaun and Bethany also shared their stories of drug addiction and with God’s help had recovered and are now working with MN Teen Challenge.”
Is the Know the Truth program different when offered in a church instead of a high school?
Federally funded faith-based programs are controversial for the very reasons that make faith-based programs work for those who share the programs’ beliefs. The faithful cannot remain true to their faith if the government demands that faith be removed from a part of the program. The government cannot fulfill its commitment to the taxpayers if it supports a program that requires a certain faith from the staff and participants.
Ramstad’s position on faith-based recovery programs will come under further scrutiny if he secures a top job in the Obama administration.
Related: Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann also has ties to Minnesota Teen Challenge
Update: As MNTC was not contacted for this article, we’ve agreed to publish a letter from the organization’s executive director. Read it here.














16 Comments »
Comment posted December 9, 2008 @ 10:38 am
Teen Challenge is also heavily wrapped up in the Tom Petters financial fraud scandal. The common link between the two is Frank Vennes, a convicted money launderer and former Teen Challenge board member who allegedly steered loads of Teen Challenge investments to Petters’ companies. Michele Bachmann and Norm Coleman wrote letters of recommendation for a presidential pardon for Vennes, who has not yet been charged in the Petters affair. Ramstad’s relationship to Teen Challenge should clearly be a part of any investigation of his qualifications for “drug czar.”
Comment posted December 9, 2008 @ 4:34 pm
Considering that even AA has been declared religious by two different federal district courts, something like Teen Challenge is religion squared.
BUT… B.O. is on record as saying he wants to EXPAND Shrub’s faith-based initiatives, so don’t be surprised if Ramstad is indeed tapped for one of the two positions.
As far as “drug czar,” it’s more than Ramstad earmarking money for a religious treatment program. Someone with a religious background like his will continue to talk about a “War on Drugs,” which is half the problem in the first place.
Comment posted December 9, 2008 @ 4:36 pm
Lots of reckless reporting and innuendo here. Teen Challenge is an incredibly successful faith-based program that saves peoples lives from addiction.
Comment posted December 9, 2008 @ 8:23 pm
Teen Challenge also promotes Exodus – an ex-gay ministry:
http://gaynz.com/blog/redqueen/archives/392
Minnesota Teen Challenge has several locations in Minneapolis. Teen challenge is notorious for being abusive to their clients:
For some first hand accouts go to these sites:
http://www.teenchallengeexposed.com/
http://teenchallengecult.blogspot.com/
Teen Challenge is NOT successful. They manipulate their success rates by booting out unsuccessful clients.
They should NOT get ANY public funding. People should contact Amy Klobuchar about this. In the past she has been part of a Teen Challenge fundraiser.
Comment posted December 10, 2008 @ 8:51 am
…
If he can’t resist keeping religion and taxpayer money seperate, he should not be considered for a government position. Many religous groups would hire him to proselytize or lobby for them.
Comment posted December 11, 2008 @ 8:31 am
It should be noted that Jim Ramstad supports many recovery programs, both secular and non-secular. He has made no secret of his own recovery, nor his Christianity, and while no recovery program works for everyone, all work for some, and Teen Challenge is no exception.
Comment posted December 12, 2008 @ 8:18 am
Do you really think that Obama will be concerned about this since he himelf has requested money for Teen Challenge in his state?
http://www.catalyst-chicago.org/RUSSO/index.php/entry/637/Obama_Education_Funding_Requests
Comment posted December 12, 2008 @ 3:07 pm
Come on. There were hundreds of victims of the Petters fraud. He was seen as a respected titan of Minnesota business for years before his fall. No one saw the collapse of his empire coming. Good people and organizations were hurt. Petters needs to pay, not his victims.
Comment posted December 12, 2008 @ 3:09 pm
Come on. There were hundreds of victims of the Petters fraud. He was seen as a respected titan of Minnesota business for years before his fall. No one saw the collapse of his empire coming. Good people and organizations were hurt. Petters needs to pay, not his victims.
Comment posted December 12, 2008 @ 6:14 pm
“Completed Jews”? Ick. How convenient to prey on people who need help and try to get them hooked.
Comment posted December 12, 2008 @ 6:39 pm
Amy Klobuchar has also requested an earmark for Minnesota Teen Challenge. My question is whether Minnesota Independent will cover Obama and Klobuchar’s requests for Teen Challenge earmarks.
Comment posted December 12, 2008 @ 8:51 pm
The answer is yes, Eva. Minnesota Independent has been working for the past few days to put together a post on Klobuchar’s request and you will see a post in the next few days.
Comment posted December 14, 2008 @ 8:48 am
This article seems unfair. MN Teen Challenge helps a lot of people that need it. Seems to me that we should be supporting programs that help people get off of drugs and not running them down. This seems to be the same old politics as usual and completely different from what Obama stands for. Do we really need to hurt people and programs just to make a political point?!
Comment posted December 14, 2008 @ 5:48 pm
What about my article “seems unfair?” Examples please. I haven’t challenged the effectiveness of the program or denied that it helps people. The question and the point being made is whether faith-based programs can do their job with government funding. I raise some issues associated with that and ask if Democrats in the confirmation process might find it problematic.
And how have we “hurt people and programs just to make a political point?!”
I appreciate your comment Scott, but MNTC is and has been controversial. What you haven’t explained is why a controversial program, receiving public money, should not be scrutinized.
Comment posted December 20, 2008 @ 1:14 pm
Just tax churches and let them ask for money from the government like other non profit organizations do. Most of organized religion is just one huge tax scam business anyway.
If we taxed churches, we would save California’s budget shortfall by the end of next year. This would also allow churches to back community leaders in elections.
Bottom line? If you are religious, you don’t get government money. That is the way it should be. Unless you are taxed like everyone else.
Comment posted January 16, 2009 @ 11:56 am
Let’s tax all the churches, after all, Religion is what keeps the poor from killing the rich.
Obama is making a grave mistake to want this jerk anywhere near him.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment