Barack Obama’s election with the middle name Hussein (invoked to rile Republican crowds during the presidential campaign) should inspire Muslims to pursue public service and other work, even if they speak with accents or their names are perceived as foreign-sounding, U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison told the recent annual meeting of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Ellison, the first Muslim member of Congress, followed up on CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad’s plea for Obama to hire Muslims to federal posts by urging American Muslims to apply for some of the administration’s 8,000 job openings.
Another speaker, Isha Mehmoud, a student who received CAIR’s civil rights award, expressed mixed feelings about Obama:
I was extremely disappointed, actually, when I have heard about the two women who were wearing the [Hijab] and his campaign did not want them behind him in the video. And I think some of that is part of running for a campaign, and they were trying to make sure he would win. And then maybe, hopefully, now that he has won, he will come out and say something or make a statement committing to civil rights of Muslim-Americans.
Ellison disagreed:
I think the one thing that is in the way of American Muslims doing well under President Obama is the belief that we need him to say positive things about us in order for us to do well.
Ellison spoke about Obama’s middle name last March in an interview with the BBC. His prediction that people wouldn’t get inflamed about it proved incorrect, but he was right to say it wouldn’t stop Obama from being elected.
BBC: Coming back to Senator Obama, doesn’t the idea that a man whose middle name is Hussein can’t get elected to the White House, doesn’t that have some currency?
ELLISON: Hussein just means “handsome.” That’s all it means. It’s a common name, as common as John or James out in the Western countries. People aren’t going to be inflamed about it. There are names outside of the Western world that are extremely common but to us they might sound foreign or Middle Eastern, and so some bigots might think that that’s going to scare us away from a good candidate, but it’s just not gonna.
This week Obama said he plans to use his full name at his inauguration (hat tip: MinnPost) and Ellison went on pilgrimage to Mecca (hat tip: MPR). Obama said:
I think the tradition is that they use all three names, and I will follow the tradition, not trying to make a statement one way or the other.
And Ellison is paraphrased as saying of his Hajj pilgrimage:
[Y]ou forget who you are — black or white and American or African — and where you come from when you are before God circling the Kaaba [the large masonry cubic structure near Mecca] in a two-piece unstitched garment.













12 Comments »
Comment posted December 10, 2008 @ 8:59 pm
This article is a bunch of horse pucky. No middle eastern names in American goverment bad enough liberal democrats voted for Obama.
Comment posted December 10, 2008 @ 10:21 pm
Keith obviously believes that Barack Obama has the intention of being something besides the Republican Conservative in liberal clothing that he is. He is in the corporate pocket just like the rest of them. We are never getting out of Iraq or Afghanistan and the current whipping boy is the Muslim world. I will believe this “change” thing when I see it.
Comment posted December 10, 2008 @ 11:58 pm
Sad. This article seems to be bringing out the tin foil hats.
Comment posted December 11, 2008 @ 8:58 am
1. It’s not a tradition to use all 3 names, and Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter didn’t use their full names. What is ironic is that Obama, his wife, Muslims, the entire mass media all called anyone who used his middle name during the election racists and the mass media refused to even use his middle name – which is a Muslim/Arabic name. Although Obama tried to tell us it was an African name. So which is it Mr. Ellison?
2. Does Ellison do any work for the people of Minnesota? Does he do anything but attend Muslim events around the U.S. and the world? Who paid for his trip to Mecca? And will he follow the words of the Grand Mufti who preached at the Hajj and called for capitalism to be replaced with sharia law?
3. Obama is not a conservative republican as it sounds like a previous commenter noted…unless that was sarcasm…but you can be sure both Ellison and Obama are in the pocket of the Saudi’s and radicals and they will bring America to its knees.
Comment posted December 11, 2008 @ 11:10 am
Am I dreaming? Am I witnessing the slow transformation of the mighty US into the ‘Islamic Republic of the United States of America’?
Thanks so much Barack! We needed that change, didn’t we?
Comment posted December 11, 2008 @ 1:06 pm
RoDrigO (RODRIGUES),
SHAME ON YOU TO MAKE SUCH COMMENTS.
Comment posted December 17, 2008 @ 8:29 pm
Before anyone else makes a bigoted comment about Islam, lets consider a few things.
1. Not all Muslims believe the same things. Just as Christianity has many denominations, often with totally opposed viewpoints, Islam is a religion of many voices, many interpretations. Just as there are terrorist Christians and Jews in the world, so are there violent Muslims. It is not a religion of war, no matter how much you’ve been propagandized. Terrorism is the result of injustice, deprivation, and brainwashing, not religious conviction. Terrorists are a godless, forsaken lot, hardly worthy of being called a Muslim.
2. Muslims in US government is not the end of the United States. That’s what Catholics said when Protestants started winning elections. It will not “bring America to it’s knees.” On the contrary, six years of invading Muslim countries has crippled us. We might really get somewhere if we decide to work together for peace and justice with our Muslim brothers.
3. Muslims fear America much more than the other way around. We’ve suffered one day of terror at the hands of extremists, but the middle east has gone through decades of invasions, CIA manufactured coups, land grabs, sanctions, aerial bombings, and propping up of dictators by Western powers. Believe it or not, Arabs have far more legit grievances against the West than vice versa.
So instead of hating and fearing people you’ve never had any real contact with, try to see past the propaganda, read some history from many different sources, and try to understand rather than destroy.
Comment posted December 17, 2008 @ 10:55 pm
Ellison is a native born African-American. He chose to embrace the Muslim faith as an adult. That doesn’t make him an Arab or a Middle Easterner. We should be interested in effective politicians, not in their religious orientation. Religion doesn’t belong in politics, be it Muslim, Christian, Jewish or any other.
America was founded with a belief in freedom of religion….
And also freedom FROM religion.
Comment posted December 18, 2008 @ 3:01 pm
Kudos to rckstrdave and Jimmy. Very elegantly put. Mary, you should learn from rckstrdave. It really could help you reduce your ignorance a bit. What crippled our economy is two by-choice wars, foreign policies of blind support of Israel which is often times against US interests, bad economic policies and the notion among neo-cons that we could stick it to the world without any consequences. That’s why we have a problem Mary, not because our president-elect’s middle name is Hussain.
Comment posted December 18, 2008 @ 9:41 pm
How does the quote go?
“One small step for Man, one giant leap for religious theocracy!!” Thorum
Comment posted December 18, 2008 @ 9:47 pm
I should have thrown in that apparently Minnesota is leading the way in supplying Jihadists. Way to go Minneso!!! Religion of peace…….
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-12-18-somalis_N.htm
Comment posted December 26, 2008 @ 4:59 am
Soon, I think, Christians and Muslims will be able to form an effecive alliance against terrorism and break away from jewish (zionist, that is) orchestrated wars.
This Christian Muslim alliance will probably bring about a huge economic boom for America.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment