Obama responds to critics over Rick Warren as outrage from gay community grows
Thursday, December 18, 2008 at 2:02 pm
The fallout from the decision by President-elect Barack Obama to select evangelical preacher Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration continues as Warren explains his incendiary statement, Obama explains his decision, the pundits weigh in on what Warren means to the Obama team and LGBT leaders continue to cry foul.
Warren answers the question, “Are you a homophobe?”
Contrary to early reports, AmericaBlog reports that Obama himself made the decision to include Warren, not the inauguration committee. “A powerful Democratic friend contacted me this morning to let me know that they talked to the key players yesterday, and Diane Feinstein, chair of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies, had nothing to do with the pick of Rick Warren as Obama’s invocation speaker at the inaugural. The decision was made by Obama himself, I’m told, and Feinstein just assumed that he had vetted it with his staff.”
The Obama camp also passed out talking points ont he controversy:
Pastor Rick Warren has a long history of activism on behalf of the disadvantaged and the downtrodden. He’s devoted his life to performing good works for the poor and leads the evangelical movement in addressing the global HIV/AIDS crisis. In fact, the President-elect recently addressed Rick Warren’s Saddleback Civil Forum on Global Health to salute Warren’s leadership in the struggle against HIV/AIDS and pledge his support to the effort in the years ahead.
The President-elect disagrees with Pastor Warren on issues that affect the LGBT community. They disagree on other issues as well. But what’s important is that they agree on many issues vital to the pursuit of social justice, including poverty relief and moving toward a sustainable planet; and they share a commitment to renewing America’s promise by expanding opportunity at home and restoring our moral leadership abroad.
As he’s said again and again, the President-elect is committed to bringing together all sides of the faith discussion in search of common ground. That’s the only way we’ll be able to unite this country with the resolve and common purpose necessary to solve the challenges we face.
The Inauguration will also involve Reverend Joseph Lowery, who will be delivering the official benediction at the Inauguration. Reverend Lowery is a giant of the civil rights movement who boasts a proudly progressive record on LGBT issues. He has been a leader in the struggle for civil rights for all Americans, gay or straight.
And for the very first time, there will be a group representing the interests of LGBT Americans participating in the Inaugural Parade.
Obama also hit the airwaves to explain his side of the story.
Pundits and columnists are making their displeasure over Warren known. The Nation writes:
Warren represents the absolute worst of the Democrats’ religious outreach, a right-winger masquerading as a do-gooder anointed as the arbiter of what it means to be faithful. Obama’s religious outreach was intended, supposedly, to make religious voters more comfortable with him and feel included in the Democratic Party. But that outreach now has come at the expense of other people’s comfort and inclusion, at an event meant to mark a turning point away from divisive politics.
And three different Democratic pundits share three different views on CNN:
3 Comments
Comment posted December 18, 2008 @ 2:26 pm
If Rick Warren had been anti-Black, anti-Hispanic, anti-Asian, anti-Jew, anti-any other minority other than gay, then he would not have been given a place at Obama’s inaugural table because it would have been wrong to give such a person a platform in which to give validity to their bigotry. But since Warren is anti-gay, Obama tries to defend his choice by saying he wants to listen to differing viewpoints. Bigotry is bigotry, no matter what rhetoric you wrap it in. If we are to use Obama’s failed logic on this issue, then white supremacists should have a chair at Obama’s inaugural table (but they won’t because we know their positions on social issues are wrong, just as Rick Warren is wrong). Obama blew it with this one. It is painfully obvious to anyone with a brain that this is simply pandering to the radical religious whack jobs who have held this country hostage, via the Bush regime, for the last 8 years. With this most egregious of decisions, Obama has flushed his credibility down the toilet. This is not change we can believe in. This is just more of the same garbage that gay people have had to deal with the last 8 years. And it stinks. Obama benefitted greatly from gay people’s, their friends’, and their families’ financial donations and their votes (including financial donations and vote from this gay person). And how are we repaid? We are thrown under the bus. The hearts and minds of a huge segment of the U.S. population are lost by such a purely political maneuver, and we cannot be one people/one country because of it. Here’s hoping Obama wises up. If he wants to fix this country, he’s going to need everyone’s involvement, and right now, gays, their families, and friends are feeling like their involvement in cleaning up this country is neither wanted nor desired. Not a good message. Not a good way to begin Obama’s presidency. Not good at all. And there’s no excuse for it.
Comment posted December 19, 2008 @ 4:34 pm
Rick Warren expresses the viewpoint of the vast, overwhelming majority of religious leaders worldwide, and the majority of the people of America.
The gay rights crowd has a choice to make, they can educate themselves, and learn to live with the fact that their behavior choices will be tolerated, but never accepted, or they can scream and yell ala California which will show the entire country just how radical they are.
Comment posted January 16, 2009 @ 2:07 pm
Yes, Warren is a brilliant man. Burning condoms is probably the best way to prevent AIDs. The world is truly a better place because of him.
That the majority of Americans believe that rights should only be given to humans who are exactly like them is a tragedy and absolutely sickening. Rights should be for all people, regardless of religious belief, race, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






