Coleman Introduces ‘All Students Can Achieve’ Act
Friday, July 20, 2007 at 10:07 am
U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman is co-sponsoring a bill designed to augment No Child Left Behind, President Bush’s flagship education program due for reauthorization this year.
In a statement with his co-sponsors on Wednesday, Sens. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., Coleman said the new bill “focuses on improving teacher effectiveness and raising education standards for America’s students.” The bill is dubbed the “All Students Can Achieve Act of 2007,” or ASCA.
The Minnesota Republican said states would be granted the flexibility to opt out of key provisions in No Child Left Behind (NCLB). For example, states would no longer worry about the “highly qualified teacher requirement,” which mandated that all teachers have licenses and other subject-specific qualifications.
Said Coleman: “Our legislation provides the flexibility educators have been asking for, without sacrificing high quality education for our children. Moreover, it builds upon [NCLB's] successes while also addressing its weaknesses, by promoting flexibility while maintaining accountability, high standards, effectiveness, and access to quality resources.”
One way to measure effectiveness, Coleman said, is to assess teachers’ quality by measuring students’ performance.
In the Twin Cities, the reaction by the education community was cautious. Tom Dooher, president of Education Minnesota, the state’s largest teacher union, said he’s pleased to see senators trying to fix the NCLB.
But he expressed concerns with the new bill. “The proposal to exempt states from the current highly qualified requirements needs to be scrutinized. Licensure, certification and robust professional development for our teachers are essential to improving overall achievement,” he said.
Coleman, who is up for re-election in 2008, said his proposal replaces teacher qualification with teacher effectiveness. Unlike the NCLB, the new bill would allow states to measure students’ academic growth by creating a comprehensive tracking system.
ASCA also identified two key objectives that would be rewarded with “incentive grants.” One is to set high expectations for students by creating a direct path to college while attending grades K-12. The second is to close the achievement gap through increased academic and strategic resources for underperforming schools and correct the loopholes in NCLB.
Charles Kyte, executive director of the Minnesota Association of School Administrators, welcomes those two objectives. But he said “tying student achievement to teachers…is a difficult thing to do.”
Though the “devil is the details,” the proposed act seems to capture the real spirit that was intended for NCLB, said Bernadeia Johnson, chief academic officer for Minneapolis Public Schools.
“It’s holding people accountable,” she said. “And that’s a good move.”
When the law, the intent and the practice meet, she said, you will get results from students.
More than 50 senators have expressed a desire to introduce some kind of education reform this year since support for NCLB has faded. Kyte and others said the competition is likely to produce a package acceptable to most everyone.
Related: A Primer on No Child Left Behind
2 Comments
Comment posted July 23, 2007 @ 6:03 pm
Expertise is not proprietary I would welcome the proposed change from formal qualifications to results produced by a teacher.
As one who held a secondary schools teaching certificate many years ago, and who was active in the educational community at the secondary and college levels for over 25 years, I can testify first hand to the benefits of getting instruction in many areas from those who have actually done what they are teaching about.
I don’t regret at all the learning that led to my teaching certificate: I used it all through my teaching years.
But I also saw the HUGE benefits of teaching what one has not only studied but actually done, as my experience in the real world accumulated. And the students can also see it clearly — one can just watch them snap to attention when a teacher with real world experience starts to speak.
It has been one of my regrets that No Child Left Behind put barriers to using coaches whose knowledge came from having “played the game.” It seemed, and still seems to me ridiculous.
Comment posted July 23, 2007 @ 1:03 pm
Expertise is not proprietary I would welcome the proposed change from formal qualifications to results produced by a teacher.
As one who held a secondary schools teaching certificate many years ago, and who was active in the educational community at the secondary and college levels for over 25 years, I can testify first hand to the benefits of getting instruction in many areas from those who have actually done what they are teaching about.
I don't regret at all the learning that led to my teaching certificate: I used it all through my teaching years.
But I also saw the HUGE benefits of teaching what one has not only studied but actually done, as my experience in the real world accumulated. And the students can also see it clearly — one can just watch them snap to attention when a teacher with real world experience starts to speak.
It has been one of my regrets that No Child Left Behind put barriers to using coaches whose knowledge came from having “played the game.” It seemed, and still seems to me ridiculous.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






