Democrat Al Franken will not lose the lead he gained Friday in the Minnesota Senate recount, his campaign’s recount attorney said today. Franken’s margin over Republican U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman, now in the low three-digits in many media estimates, will stand between 35 and 50 votes next Tuesday, attorney Marc Elias told reporters during a rare weekend press conference. By then the State Canvassing Board expects to have added back thousands of withdrawn ballot challenges to its tally of votes in the Nov. 4 election that were so far not included in official running recount totals.
The pronouncement that Franken will soon be Minnesota’s senator-elect is not just the campaign talking; it’s the campaign’s math talking. Franken’s figures always “assumed those [challenged] ballots would end up in the tally of the candidate for whom each one was originally called,” as a campaign statement put it. “[T]he internal count can predict the result of that work with certainty: a 35-50 vote lead for Franken.”
In a tone that sounded simultaneously tired, sober and certain, Elias said he is confident that Franken’s lead will also withstand the statewide canvass of wrongly rejected absentee votes that the Minnesota Supreme Court ordered counties to conduct by Dec. 31. Indeed, that tabulation of as many as 1,600 uncounted but properly cast votes is widely expected to favor Franken.
Elias dismissed Coleman campaign motions filed Friday that ask the state Supreme Court to order the canvassing board not to count or certify a recount that contains duplicate ballots which Coleman alleges may have been counted twice. Elias said Coleman’s concern about duplicate ballots represented a reversal from its earlier position, a departure from an agreement the campaigns had on how to deal with duplicates, an effort to prolong and cast doubt on the recount process, and a sign of panic from a campaign that now sees it will lose. Local elections officials create duplicate ballots when voters’ original ballots that get too damaged or soiled to be read by vote-counting machines.














5 Comments »
Comment posted December 21, 2008 @ 4:27 pm
I think the way to resolve the absentee votes is as follows:
1.The precincts should be ordered to continue sorting through the uncounted absentee ballots with wrongly challenged put in a separate pile five. Coleman and Franken can have observers.
2. All ballots in pile five should be sent to the Secretary of State (SOS) along with a copy of the proof that the ballot was WRONGLY rejected. For example, if it was rejected because the voter was NOT registered, then a copy of the voter’s registration should be attached.
3. The SOS and representatives from Franken and Coleman go through the ballots. Those they all agree should be counted go in one pile. Those they all agree should NOT be counted go in a second pile. Those they don’t agree on go in a third challenged pile.
4. The ballots in pile one are opened and counted with both campaigns allowed to challenge the ballots.
5. The challenged unopened ballots from pile 3 and the challenged opened ballots are sent to the Board. The board rules on the challenges and the votes are awarded.
Comment posted December 22, 2008 @ 1:56 am
Here’s how this is resolved. Another election. Liberals in this states legislature have squandered billions of dollars in the last two years. Last year a $6.6b tax increase. This year a $5.6b deficit. The spending went faster than the tax receipts. Had the budget been passed last year w/o the override, spending would have been less, thus the budget deficit would be less. The estimate to have another election is around $5 million. Screw this idiotic recount and have another election…
Comment posted December 22, 2008 @ 10:13 am
Mr. Elias is basing this off of what? His last Tarot reading? Or that’s what his horoscope said? This quote isn’t newsworthy, ergo this post is worthless.
Comment posted December 22, 2008 @ 3:14 pm
Why not just have a vote off? Te only way either guy is able to have a mandate going foreard? And how can you people take Al Franken seriously? He is not even funny.
Comment posted December 22, 2008 @ 8:54 pm
I see that the crazies are out. Ho hum.
It looks like things are going to get nasty now. Coleman is talking to one of Bush’s Florida 2000 experts (a guy involved with the Swiftboaters too).
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment