The Star Tribune was uncharacteristically effusive in its praise for the State Canvassing Board yesterday, editorializing that the complicated statewide recount has gone smoothly. “The judgments of the State Canvassing Board to date are also due a heaping measure of citizen confidence,” the editorial read. “The five-member board’s orderly, transparent and efficient dispatch of 6,655 challenged ballots has served this state well.”
But Michael Brodkorb of Minnesota Democrats Exposed declares a partisan failing in one canvassing board’s attempt at providing transparency.
He writes: “‘Non-partisan’ Secretary of State Mark Ritchie’s office has joined forces with the partisan liberal video-blog The UpTake to provide a live video feed of today’s State Canvassing Board meeting.”
Ritchie’s “SHAME,” as Brodkorb — characteristically in ALL-CAPS — puts it?
Writing via official SoS communique that “a live feed will be provided through ‘The Uptake.’” As City Pages notes, “The live feeds usually provided at the state Capitol are not in use this week and The Uptake has been providing an amazing service to people interested in the race by offering free and live video feeds of the state Canvassing Board meetings on their site.”
The UpTake offers the streams without added editorial comment. While their edited videos tend to be perspective-based, the Canvassing Board video feeds have been raw and live — more like C-Span than MDE. “This would be like Governor Pawlenty telling Minnesotans to go to [MDE] to find out information about his budget proposals,” Brodkorb insists. “While my blog is more credible, you get my point.”
A tempest in the teapot? Just an insider media squabble about who’s “legitimate media“? Maybe not.
Within a few hours of his first post, Brodkorb added another, by GOP chair Ron Carey, whose candidacy Brodkorb championed as Carey’s 2007 campaign manager (Brodkorb has also reportedly been hired as media director for the Senate Republican Caucus.)
Like Brodkorb, Carey apparently would also prefer a Canvassing Board blackout instead of commentary-free UpTake streams: “It’s amazing that a partisan, liberal blog” — a description nearly identical to Brodkorb’s — “has been made the official provider of the video for the Canvassing Board,” Carey said.
Then he gets to what might be the real strategy behind such a benign-seeming service as unmanipulated video feeds of public proceedings: Casting doubt on a recount process that shows Carey’s candidate headed for an increasingly likely defeat.
“To make a group with an agenda and a record of attacking one of the candidates before the Canvassing Board the purveyor of information is beyond improper, it calls into question the judgment of those who made the decision for this partisan website to be the sanctioned broadcaster of these important proceedings.”













9 Comments »
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 3:13 pm
It’s obvious Brodkorb hasn’t watched the service provided by The Uptake. The Uptake stepped up to the plate when the State of Minnesota couldn’t provide personnel to work the video feed from the State Canvassing Board and the MN Supreme Court hearings because of the holidays. And, The Uptake offered the feed to any other media outlet that wanted to put it on their web sites, free of charge. Prior to this time, The Uptake took the pool video that everyone else used since it was provided by the State. The coverage has been the same for both feeds – no commentary, no partisanship, no comments – just providing unedited video of the hearings. Brodkorb and his group are trying to put doubt onto an impeccably transparent process that Minnesota should be proud of. I know I am. Mark Ritchie and the Canvassing Board have done a superb job in dealing with the challenged ballots and The Uptake has done an invaluable public service in providing live video when the State could not. This recount will be looked at as the correct way to conduct such business and will serve as a model for the rest of the nation. Ritchie and his team in the SOS office deserve our thanks for their integrity, The Uptake deserves our thanks for their part in supporting clean journalism, and Brodkorb needs to face reality.
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 3:28 pm
Why didn’t Brodkorb stream the coverage from his site if he didn’t like it? They are just mad because everyone can see how open and honest the recount has been. It makes their bias/fraud/partisan stories hard to sell.
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 4:30 pm
I think that Coleman is going to pull out all the dirty-politics stops and try to discredit the process. I don’t see how he could do this without smearing the whole state of Minnesota, including a lot of Republicans, but that’s what I expect him to do, The Franken people should point out that he’s effectively badmothing the state he hopes to respresent.
Coleman has been talking to a Swiftboater who was also involved in Florida 2000:
http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/gop-recount-guru-advises-coleman-2008-12-22.html
Hack Republican Senator Cornyn has started to stink up the place.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/scorecard/1208/Cornyn_Franken_camp_promoting_chaos.html#comments
Comment posted December 30, 2008 @ 5:49 pm
What people need to realize is that Michael Brodkorb, Ron Carey, Tim Pawlenty and Norm Coleman all speak from the same mouthpiece: Michael Brodkorb. They pay him well to write this crap and pretend it’s someone else That’s why they all sound like they’re parroting one another’s talking points–because they’re the same person. Brodkorb now will collect a state paycheck to do the same for the MN Senate Republican Caucus.
Comment posted December 31, 2008 @ 12:09 am
Norm wears Kaz’s suit. The uptake films it. Does this mean it is not a gift to Norm?
Comment posted December 31, 2008 @ 9:21 am
Brodkorb is a Republican tool.
Comment posted January 2, 2009 @ 2:52 am
“John Emerson” raving LIBTARD doesn’t know, ‘hack’ from peanut butter…
What we are witnessing here is yet another corrupt Democrat attempt to steal the vote…
Comment posted January 2, 2009 @ 9:23 pm
R. Harris, you loser —
Love you, dude. LOVE YOU.
Comment posted January 3, 2009 @ 6:13 pm
R. Harris, you voted for Bush twice right?
Did you ever stop to question your grasp of reality?
I don’t suppose you watched the count, today. The voices told you not to.
Nothing like a fair count to make me feel good about 2009!
Ever wonder why Democrats are so confident when counting wrongly rejected ballots? We know why they are being wrongly rejected… name sounds too African American to be valid… and who is doing the wrongful rejecting… same side headed to court Monday morning.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment