Free-Speech Advocates Object to Permits for Minneapolis Protests

A city of Minneapolis plan to require permits for protests is drawing the ire of local free-speech groups. The local chapter of the National Lawyers Guild blasted the city for what a spokesman described as an obstacle to the exercise of free speech in the city.

“Given that ordinances already exist for marches and parades on public streets, and flawed regulations exist for public parks, there simply is no need for this proposed ordinance,” said Minneapolis attorney Bruce Nestor, a member of the guild.

Under the proposal, demonstrators would be required to apply — and to receive a permit — a year ahead of holding protests. The city’s plan comes just a year before the Republican National Convention, which is scheduled to be held in St. Paul August next year. Protest groups have already planned to hold major rallies near the site of the convention.

Nestor says the proposed requirement is clearly designed to curb people from expressing their opinions.

“Any ordinance must also include provisions recognizing spontaneous demonstrations based on recent events. This includes provisions for permitting demonstrations and rallies with less than 24-hour notice,” he said. 

Minneapolis police said the proposed procedure would allow them to effectively handle traffic and notify businesses that could be affected as a result.

Spokesman for Minneapolis Mayor R. T. Rybak said because the mayor has been focused so much on the 35W bridge collapse, he has not had sufficient time to think about the idea.

The Free Speech Committee, a group set up by the city council, is also studying into the issue.

Some protesters said they plan to ignore the city’s permit plan, even if that entails breaking some laws.