Polarity and the Press: A new Pew study finds that people who use the internet as their sole news source are both highly critical of the mainstream media and highly educated. More Democrats than Republicans say they favor news in all media, and people who get their news mainly from Fox have harsher opinions of the media: 63 percent of Fox viewers say mainstream news reports are often inaccurate; 54 percent say the press is “too critical of America”; and 49 percent think the press has been unfair to George W. Bush.
Eric Black ponders the numbers, looking at long-term trends and the effect of “Limbaughism” in the mid-1990s. But it’s the widening polarity of politics that has him concerned. “I’ve believed that the so-called polarization of U.S. politics was a bit overstated, because most people aren’t political enough to be polarized. But Pew’s section on the growing partisan divide has me wondering,” he writes. “I do worry though that the blogosphere makes it ever-easier for citizens to spend their reading time having their preconceptions constantly reinforced.”
Brodkorb’s “inner psychic”: In a recent Bloghouse column, the Star Tribune’s Tim O’Brien gives a rundown of bloggers’ takes on the politics of the 35W collapse. Just after Minnesota Democrats Exposed blogger Michael Brodkorb fisked (or was it “cluster-fisked“?) the St. Cloud Times’ Larry Schumacher, he gets similar treatment from O’Brien: “Brodkorb even channeled his inner psychic to read the mind of Rep. Melissa Hortman,” he writes. “Hortman told the Denver Post that ‘you wonder if this bridge was built to withstand the massive heat we have had this summer.’ In Brodkorb’s partisan translator, that meant she was claiming that global warming brought down the bridge. There’s blogging, and there’s fiction writing — you be the judge.” (Brodkorb’s rebuttal here.)
more insideStrib CFO on “proprietary” PiPress spreadsheets: The Star Tribune’s recently departed CFO Mike Riggs is highlighted in Editor & Publisher’s latest round of excerpts from the Par Ridder trial early this summer. Riggs, who was named as a defendant in the trial, testified that Ridder gave him spreadsheets filled with proprietary information from the Pioneer Press. E&P found it interesting that Riggs didn’t indicate any of the data would be used to get an unfair advantage over the competition, but he reiterated that Ridder told him to make sure information on and about the PiPress spreadsheets didn’t “get out.” The judge’s decision on the case is expected in the next few weeks.
Got a tip for Media Monitor? E-mail us your media news.













8 Comments »
Comment posted August 14, 2007 @ 2:17 pm
Why does Michael Brodkorb allow terroristic threats on his blog? Speaking of Michael Brodkorb, as of 2:10 p.m. today, this comment remained on Brodkorb’s blog on a thread about the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL):
zeebus Says:
August 14th, 2007 at 7:57 am
where are those abortion clinic bombers when you need them?
NARAL could use a few pipe bombs…
Read more here:
http://dumpbachmann….
Comment posted August 14, 2007 @ 5:14 pm
in a moment of really bizzare fairness for me Michael did remove the comment after it was brought to his attention. And speaking as someone who’s had to try and monitor comment threads for that sort of thing while actually trying to run a website, it does happen and the best you can do is clean as soon as you notice it.
There’s yet another reason we closed our comments to non-registered users.
Comment posted August 14, 2007 @ 7:35 pm
What rebuttal? Brodkorb made an assertion that liberals and conservatives asked if Hortman was making a connection to global warming but doesn’t name anybody. Then he links back to the bloghouse. I didn’t see anything in the press about others asking that question. I did see a conservative on the Big Question repeat what Brodkorb said but it didn’t fly there either.
Comment posted August 14, 2007 @ 8:54 pm
No excuses for Brodkorb Michael Brodkorb monitors his website closely and comments on the comments there regularly. There’s no way in hell he didn’t know that post was out there. He posted several comments on his blog while his pipe-bomber post remained on MDE for several hours. Even some of his regular posters began defending the pipe-bombing post (which was made by another regular MDE commenter). Brodkorb left it up there until it was made public, and only then did he take it down.
Pure Karl Rove. Michael has learned well from his mentor.
Comment posted August 14, 2007 @ 9:17 am
Why does Michael Brodkorb allow terroristic threats on his blog? Speaking of Michael Brodkorb, as of 2:10 p.m. today, this comment remained on Brodkorb's blog on a thread about the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL):
zeebus Says:
August 14th, 2007 at 7:57 am
where are those abortion clinic bombers when you need them?
NARAL could use a few pipe bombs…
Read more here:
http://dumpbachmann….
Comment posted August 14, 2007 @ 12:14 pm
in a moment of really bizzare fairness for me Michael did remove the comment after it was brought to his attention. And speaking as someone who's had to try and monitor comment threads for that sort of thing while actually trying to run a website, it does happen and the best you can do is clean as soon as you notice it.
There's yet another reason we closed our comments to non-registered users.
Comment posted August 14, 2007 @ 2:35 pm
What rebuttal? Brodkorb made an assertion that liberals and conservatives asked if Hortman was making a connection to global warming but doesn't name anybody. Then he links back to the bloghouse. I didn't see anything in the press about others asking that question. I did see a conservative on the Big Question repeat what Brodkorb said but it didn't fly there either.
Comment posted August 14, 2007 @ 3:54 pm
No excuses for Brodkorb Michael Brodkorb monitors his website closely and comments on the comments there regularly. There's no way in hell he didn't know that post was out there. He posted several comments on his blog while his pipe-bomber post remained on MDE for several hours. Even some of his regular posters began defending the pipe-bombing post (which was made by another regular MDE commenter). Brodkorb left it up there until it was made public, and only then did he take it down.
Pure Karl Rove. Michael has learned well from his mentor.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment