http://minnesotaindependent.com/22054/franken-deemed-winner-of-senate-recount-but-coleman-will-contest-in-court News. Politics. Media. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://minnesotaindependent.com/22054/franken-deemed-winner-of-senate-recount-but-coleman-will-contest-in-court/comment-page-1#comment-22290 Kteratera Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:06:13 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=22054#comment-22290 Wasn't Coleman the one who said Franken should save the taxpayers $$$ and not go through with the recount! Where is that sentiment now Mr. Coleman? Aren't you the one using the taxpayers $$$ by contesting the recount's result? Wasn’t Coleman the one who said Franken should save the taxpayers $$$ and not go through with the recount! Where is that sentiment now Mr. Coleman? Aren’t you the one using the taxpayers $$$ by contesting the recount’s result?

]]> http://minnesotaindependent.com/22054/franken-deemed-winner-of-senate-recount-but-coleman-will-contest-in-court/comment-page-1#comment-22253 John Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:19:28 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=22054#comment-22253 Kudos to Ritchie and the canvassing board. They did a fantastic job, especially in light of the Supreme Court's crazy order leaving the absentee ballots in the hands of the campaigns. Kudos to all five. A splendid job and a fantastic role for Minnesota in dealing with a difficult situation. Kudos to Ritchie and the canvassing board. They did a fantastic job, especially in light of the Supreme Court’s crazy order leaving the absentee ballots in the hands of the campaigns. Kudos to all five. A splendid job and a fantastic role for Minnesota in dealing with a difficult situation.

]]> http://minnesotaindependent.com/22054/franken-deemed-winner-of-senate-recount-but-coleman-will-contest-in-court/comment-page-1#comment-22233 skyblue Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:43:40 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=22054#comment-22233 to be correct it's "former" Sen. Coleman, the former incumbent. His term ran out and he wasn't elected to a new one. Someone else was certified the winner. The onus is now on the loser (Coleman) to proven the entire system, and the state Supreme Court, as well as all the county canvassing boards and state canvassing board, were wrong. to be correct it’s “former” Sen. Coleman, the former incumbent. His term ran out and he wasn’t elected to a new one. Someone else was certified the winner. The onus is now on the loser (Coleman) to proven the entire system, and the state Supreme Court, as well as all the county canvassing boards and state canvassing board, were wrong.

]]>