Daily Beast: ‘Franken is the right’s new punching bag’

By Paul Demko
Wednesday, January 07, 2009 at 2:43 pm

The Daily Beast has a provocative piece up today theorizing that Sen. Al Franken might be just the remedy for an ailing Republican Party. Writer Benjamin Sarlin posits that Franken presents exactly the type of frothing, over-the-top liberalism that the GOP needs to demonize Democrats as out of touch with mainstream Americans. He cites Franken’s books (Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot and Other Observations and Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them) as proof that he’d make for an effective national whipping boy.

But isn’t Sarlin missing something here?

These books are intended to be satire. Whether you think they succeed or not, they hardly evidence how Franken might act upon becoming a senator. And most of the Franken critics that Sarlin cites — Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin, Bill O’Reilly — are hardly mainstream conservatives that swing voters are likely to take their cues from. Rather, they’re political pugilists whose sole purpose is to rile up the conservative base (and make boatloads of money).

If anything, the Senate campaign in Minnesota proved that merely attacking Al Franken as an ideolog and an interloper is not enough to convince voters to back the Republican candidate. Norm Coleman’s campaign attacked Franken incessantly throughout the contest — and it doesn’t look to have been a very successful strategy.

Comments

8 Comments

barryS
Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 2:54 pm

I think you have this backwards:

“Rather they’re political pugilists whose sole purpose is to rile up the conservative base (and make boatloads of money).”

It’s really ‘they’re political pugilists whose sole purpose is to make boatloads of money (by riling up the conservative base).’ Because really – if those blowhards could make more money riling up the liberal base – I’m sure they would jump ship in a heartbeat. Limbaugh himself has said so in several interviews… he’s an entertainer first; his show just happens to entertain the conservative base. All the others mimic his entertainment style, not his political passions.


Ralph Kramden
Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 3:01 pm

For years, Ted Kennedy was used by the right as a fund-raising stalking horse. Now, with Kennedy’s senior status and recent bout with brain cancer, he’s a much more sympathetic character, so attacking him is just bad PR.

If my recent emails from NewsMax.com are any indication (“Franken vote fraud”, “Franken and Soros”, etc, etc – Donate Now!) Franken is indeed being advanced as a lightning rod, and target for the right’s fund-raising efforts.

I certainly haven’t ponied up any funds! :-)


Eric Ferguson
Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 3:17 pm

Franken has been a punching bag for a long time. What’s new is the recount and “stolen” election is the new bloody shirt. If anyone thinks conservatives can’t be serious about this conspiracy theory lunacy, you haven’t noticed the tin foil hats stiched to their heads.


Jesse Erdmann
Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 3:18 pm

This is actually one of the reasons I wasn’t sold on Franken even though I ended up voting for him. I almost am willing to take six more years of Coleman chasing the political winds, especially since they seem to be blowing more moderately, and get a better DFL candidate in the next go ’round that would have more staying power. (Keith Ellison would be nice if we were certain the black Muslim thing wouldn’t scare off too many suburban to rural voters. Of course, in six years we’re probably still going to be at the point where Muslim is just as bad or worse “red meat” for the right wing than Franken is at the moment.)

PS: Three months ’til Thunder season. \/\/007!!!


keith Kuckler
Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 3:25 pm

i suspect that franken is way too smart to play by the rights playbook. if he adopts a low-key profile, concentrates on constituent service, and, learns the ropes in the senate, he will do just fine. i remember that paul wellstone got off to a rocky start, but, he soon found his groove, and, turned out to be an effective senator. i think franken will do the same. if he concentrates on issues of working minnesotans, he will serve a long time. i can hardly wait for his maiden speech in the senate, he should interject a note of lightness, in a body, that all to often takes it self way to seriously.


Ed Norton
Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 3:34 pm

Maybe “over the top” liberals want some representation, too. “Idealogs” (is that some new kind of Web service?) may be just fine provided that they have good ideas that result from critical thinking.

The barking right will find someone to hound no matter what. If it is not Franken, it would be somebody else. Franken actually has a good defense. He can claim that the right has it in for him because he exposed their lies.


lazercat
Comment posted January 7, 2009 @ 7:02 pm

I don’t think Republicans get the whole concept of sarcasm. For that matter they don’t get the concept of conservatism or fiscal responsibility either.


John Emerson
Comment posted January 8, 2009 @ 8:41 am

After six years in office Franken should be safe. People will realize that he’s not Stuart Smalley by then.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.