Sometimes when the news leaves you seeing floaters before your eyes, all you have to do is wait a day or two for things to come into focus. On Friday, former Secretary of State (and freshly elected state representative) Mary Kiffmeyer found a range of faults with the Senate election recount between Al Franken and former U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman, as conducted by her successor in the secretary of state post, Mark Ritchie. Kiffmeyer complained to the St. Paul Legal Ledger that votes were counted that shouldn’t have been:
“If there are wrongly rejected [ballots], then you also have to accept the fact that there are wrongly accepted [ballots],” she said. “And they never went there, they never went into wrongly accepted. They didn’t take a global look at everything.” She acknowledges that doing so would have meant opening a huge can of worms. “Once you stray off that,” she said, “where do you quit once you open that door?”
Seemed like a hypothetical question at the time, but Sunday’s Star Tribune makes it sound not moot at all:
In their fight to overturn the U.S. Senate recount, Norm Coleman’s legal team has begun pressing some Minnesota counties for documents on hundreds of thousands of ballots that were not previously disputed … casting a much wider net for other mistakes that could cost Franken votes. The latest requests, dealing with approved absentee ballots and precinct voter rosters, are frustrating some counties.
The Strib report continues:
“You’re talking 30,000, 40,000 pages of documents,” said Stearns County elections chief Dave Walz, referring to his county alone. Joe Mansky, Ramsey County’s election director, said the county has received requests for copies of “over 200,000 pieces of paper” from the campaigns.
The story doesn’t detail just how globally Coleman’s team is looking into Kiffmeyer’s can of worms, but that too may become clearer in a day or two.













4 Comments
Comment posted January 11, 2009 @ 1:38 pm
People have to start speaking out against this. If Coleman gets away with this, the losers will be able to annull any close election can be annulled. Even if he just succeeds in delaying Franken’s seating by a few months, that will set a very bad precedent.
Comment posted January 11, 2009 @ 2:41 pm
Kiffmeyer’s argument is akin to saying “If votes were cast by legal residents, you must assume votes were cast by illegal residents as well” Pure wingnuttery.
Comment posted January 11, 2009 @ 3:25 pm
This election was so close that a recount was mandated. Coleman’s approach will allow ANY election to be disputed almost forever as long as the loser is willing to file an election contest. It’s the same old big corporate approach of suing an opponent to death: suits run not on the merits but on the ability of one party to the suit to outspend the other. As long as big Con supporters are willing to ante up, and every indication is that they are, the suit/suits will continute.
Comment posted January 11, 2009 @ 5:52 pm
Mary is just eating sour grapes about no longer being able to disenfranchise people of color from voting.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.