Pawlenty budget slashes family planning programs

By Andy Birkey
Tuesday, January 27, 2009 at 4:59 pm
Photo by Lisa Yarost, Flickr

Photo by Lisa Yarost, Flickr

The budget proposed Tuesday by Gov. Tim Pawlenty would cut $2 million from the Family Planning Special Projects (FPSP), a grant program that funds health departments, nonprofits and tribal governments that provide family planning services to low-income Minnesotans. The cut amounts to a 20 percent reduction.

“All women, regardless of economic status, must have the same opportunity to access health care, plan and space healthy pregnancies,” said Sarah Stoesz, president of Planned Parenthood of Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota. “Strong family planning is good health care policy, good public policy and makes good sense from both a fiscal and a social perspective.”

“As more and more Minnesota families lose jobs and insurance coverage, the governor should not stand between some of the most economically challenged women in the state and the health care they need to build stronger futures,” she said.

Family planning grants total $4.2 million a year.

Pawlenty says the programs can be cut because Minnesota has qualified for a Medicaid family planning program. “With the anticipated growth in persons receiving services through [Medicaid's] Family Planning Waiver, the reduction of Family Planning Special Project grant funds is not anticipated to have an impact on unintended pregnancies.”

But the Medicaid program would place greater restrictions on who could access subsidized family planning services and which agencies would be able to serve at-risk clients.

Follow Andy Birkey on Twitter


Comments

9 Comments

Eva Young
Comment posted January 27, 2009 @ 11:00 pm

Hopefully the legislature will cut the so-called “Positive Alternatives” boondoggle. Minnesota Teen Challenge should also be zeroed out in the budget.


cathy c
Comment posted January 28, 2009 @ 11:01 am

If abortions are no longer funded by taxpayers, think how many more democrats there’d be.


crohn's patient
Comment posted January 28, 2009 @ 11:42 am

Wow. All in the same budget proposal, Pawlenty says we should limit family planning AND cut low income healthcare and social services spending. What’s a great way to insure that more poor people have more children they can’t afford, and in turn, more low income healthcare and human service spending that the State cannot afford? Encourage them to have more kids! Another pro-GOP move by Pawlenty pandering to the far right and furthering his national political aspirations. Have we ever had a more divisive Governor? The notion of bi-partisanship is completely foreign to him.


ice cycle
Comment posted January 28, 2009 @ 4:38 pm

Interesting, but not surprising perhaps, to learn that Crohn’s disease efects the cognitive skills in liberals ;-)


kate t
Comment posted January 28, 2009 @ 5:42 pm

I guess I’m not surprised that someone would suggest that we should tell the poor NOT to have kids, since, of course, Planned Parenthood was founded by a woman who pushed a eugenics policy that focused on the poor and minorities. Oh, wait–my bad. It’s called family planning and “reporductive health care,” aka abortion. If all Planned Parenthood and those like it can offer poor people is that they don’t have any children, are they really doing anything to help those poor people get back on the right track, leading a productive and successful life? No, of course not. Planned Parenthood hasn’t contributed one thing to advancing the well-being of anyone, other than offering them the ability to not have kids. They shouldn’t act like they are doing anyone any favors. Because they aren’t. (But they are laughing all the way to the bank.)

I suppose a progam like Positive Alternatives does cut into the bottom line of organziations who have been claiming to help people, since, of course, Positive Alternatives has actually been delivering on the promise of helping people.


hads
Comment posted February 23, 2009 @ 6:32 pm

A few facts for kate t:

Planned Parenthood: 880 clinic locations in the United States, with a total budget of approximately US$1 billion, and provides an array of services to over three million people. In 2007, contraception constituted 36% of total services, STI/STD testing and treatment constituted 31%, cancer testing and screening constituted 17%; other women’s health services, including pregnancy, prenatal, midlife, and infertility were 11%, and approximately 3% of total services involved surgical and medical abortions. [5]

btw Planned Parenthood was the primary source of health care for my mid 20′s daughter for several years when she was working 3 part-time jobs and had no health insurance. They are an incredibly important organization for millions in this country and certainly don’t “laugh all the way to the bank” – the way bankers/financeers have been for the last decade – literally.


digg » Blog Archive » Roundup: Family Planning Is "Smart Government," Guttmacher Report Finds
Pingback posted February 25, 2009 @ 6:57 am

[...] it got dumped earlier this month. When GOP governors such as Minnesota’s Tim Pawlenty are using Medicaid family-planning money as an excuse to cut their budgets, how can congressional conservatives get away with slamming the [...]


Josh
Comment posted May 3, 2009 @ 8:37 pm

I believe that Family planning programs should get all the funding we can throw at them, not because I’m a far left liberal nor am I an inner city minority with 5 kids from 5 different fathers. It is simply my belief, no, allow me to rephrase, it is simply my direct observation that far to many kids are being brought into this world and right into terrible homes. With so many innocent children being victimized by their uneducated mothers and fathers daily, it is no wonder that the country is in the shape it is in.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.