A small provision in the economic stimulus package working its way through the U.S. Senate is angering the religious right.
Current proposals to repair or renovate higher education facilities stipulate that those funds cannot be spent on buildings that feature religious worship. That has sparked outcry from all corners of the religious right, who say the bill would ban students from holding Bible study or even gathering to pray on campuses.
Civil libertarians point out that the proposed rule is simply the law of the land, and federal funds can never be used to repair or renovate churches, synagogues or mosques.
“Buried in the rubble of President Obama’s $1 trillion monstrous pork/stimulus plan is a section that bans Christian Bible studies, worship services and other religious activities from many public education buildings!” wrote the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) in an fundraising pitch to supporters.
“The economic crisis is being used as a pretext to curb religious liberty at institutions of higher learning.”
TVC has been heavily lobbying Senators to have the provision deleted, the group said.
“In order to receive stimulus money our public schools will have to expel after-school Bible clubs and weekend religious meetings,” said Matt Staver of Liberty Counsel, a part of the late-Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University.
“People who want to speak about their faith will be unwelcome in public places.”
Even Minnesota’s religious right is joining in on the pressure to remove the stipulation.
“Even I was surprised to see an effort by U.S. House democrats to use the economic stimulus bill to stifle religious expression at institutions receiving public dollars,” wrote Tom Prichard, president of the Minnesota Family Council.
“I have no concerns about who will win the battle between God and His protagonists but in the meanwhile his opponents are under the delusion they can be successful. A fly eating an elephant is analogous albeit in a very superficial way.”
But as civil libertarians point out, the rule is fairly straight-forward and follows existing constitutional requirements. The bill reads:
PROHIBITED USES OF FUNDS.—No funds awarded under this section may be used for—
(A) the maintenance of systems, equipment, or facilities, including maintenance associated with any permissible uses of funds described in paragraph (1);
(B) modernization, renovation, or repair of stadiums or other facilities primarily used for athletic contests or exhibitions or other events for which admission is charged to the general public;
(C) modernization, renovation, or repair of facilities—
(i) used for sectarian instruction, religious worship, or a school or department of divinity; or
(ii) in which a substantial portion of the functions of the facilities are subsumed in a religious mission; or
(D) construction of new facilities.
“It’s almost a restatement of what the Constitution requires so there’s nothing novel in what the House did in its restriction,” Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel to the ACLU told Fox News.
“For 37 years, the law of the land is that the government can’t pay for buildings that are used for religious purposes.”
Even if it is the law, however, some religious right groups plan to sue the federal government if the bill is not changed. “If this discriminatory provision is not removed from the package and is approved and signed into law, we’ll file a lawsuit in federal court challenging this provision,” said the American Center for Law and Justice, a legal outfit created by Pat Robertson to counter the ACLU.
But that hasn’t stopped Republicans from making moves to alter the bill. Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., attempted to amend the stimulus bill to allow Christian colleges to use the stimulus money to promote religion.
“Why is an economic stimulus bill being used to kick religious groups off college campuses? It is a clear violation of students’ constitutional rights and it should disturb Americans that they are trying to slip this through while people are concerned about the economy. The real question is who inserted this discrimination into the bill, and why,” a spokeman for DeMint told Fox.
However, the bill would not kick religious groups off campus and it would not prevent schools for getting money for buildings where students hold Bible study — unless that building’s purpose is specifically for Bible study.
The falsehoods surrounding the bill have hit the religious right echo chamber so hard that People for the American Way issued a special report over the flap.
“The creation of a phony crisis that DeMint’s amendment was supposed to solve is a case study of Religious Right leaders’ strategic use of false alarms about threats to religious liberty – and of the willingness of right-wing media and elected officials to play along,” wrote the report’s authors. “Watch now, in the wake of the amendment’s defeat, for Religious Right leaders to use the vote as ‘evidence’ that Democrats are hostile to people of faith and to try to undermine support from religious Americans for the new administration.”
DeMint’s amendment did fail on Thursday, and the $3.5 billion in stimulus money allocated for higher education repairs will not be able to be used to renovate churches, synagogues or mosques.
Religious right legal groups have vowed to file a lawsuit as soon as President Obama signs the bill.











17 Comments »
Comment posted February 9, 2009 @ 8:53 pm
TVC has much in common with a similar organization QVC. It sells fake items to an unsuspecting public under the guise of value. My apologies to QVC for the comparison.
Comment posted February 9, 2009 @ 10:40 pm
Where is Jim Jones when you need him?
Pingback posted February 10, 2009 @ 6:17 am
[...] Independent is keeping an eye on the influence of religion on politics, with a look at why the religious right dislikes the stimulus package and reporting that Norm Coleman is following Michele Bachmann in claiming divine [...]
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 9:27 am
My Children,
Have you not noticed that all of these threatened “attacks on Christianity” come with fund-raising letters? Did I not give you a powerful brain? Did I not give you critical thinking skills? Why do you refuse to use the gifts I have given you?
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 11:21 am
Trojan horse. The fall of Babylon the Great the center of fall worship.
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 11:22 am
Babylon the Great Center of false worship will fall to the Trojan Horse.
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 11:25 am
Hey isn’t this what the Jehovah’s Witnesses told us about 2 years ago or so. They came to our doors and left a tract about this. Something like the end of false religion near. I read it and now it looks like it’s happening. Looks like a trojan horse to me.
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 12:29 pm
TVC has it right. People better wake up for soon it will be to late and the America that we have all know is soon to be a thing of the pass. What has made America great is it being founded on Christian beliefs and good people have kept God in America. Soon ever knee will bow to God and give account of all the wrong. Laught and make fun if you will but you will repent and it may be to late
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 1:21 pm
Where are the lions when you need ‘em?
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 7:31 pm
Politics have no place in my church, and my religion has no place in my government. I am a Christian and I believe in God. I do not understand how a Christian can use their religion to push their own political agenda. This country was founded on religious freedom. The more people insist on forcing their religion into the government, the more they risk losing this very freedom. When will people open their eyes and realize that the people who head the “Religious Right” are not even Christians. They may attend church, but really they are merely power hungry people who manipulate people of faith. Do we need yet another adulterous scandal to open people’s eyes yet again?
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 7:41 pm
BTW, the TVC’s interpretation of this section of the bill is yet another example of how they manipulate people of faith to stand up against our government. The bill is quite clear and does not differ at all with the nations current and former policies on government funding of buildings used for religious worship.
Comment posted February 10, 2009 @ 11:15 pm
You can get away with a lot of terrorism when you wrap yourself in a Bible and an American flag.
Pingback posted February 11, 2009 @ 11:42 pm
[...] by Phoenix Woman on February 12, 2009 That’s pretty much what Mike Huckabee and the other religious-right folk trying to scuttle the stimulus package are saying: A small provision in the economic stimulus package working its way through the U.S. [...]
Comment posted February 20, 2009 @ 7:44 am
Religious or not – it’s a fact that religion does do some good in communites and the world. In general religion can contribute to society in many ways – BUT
It looks as though the government doesn’t want ‘one more cent’ going
toward religion. I wonder why? What do they know that we don’t?
Comment posted February 26, 2009 @ 1:35 pm
President Obama’s stimulus bill does provide religious based institutions with money.
“The economic stimulus bill enacted by President Obama will provide $1 billion to Jewish nursing homes and social service agencies, according to the United Jewish Communities.”
http://jta.org/news/article/2009/02/17/1003063/stimulus-bill-gives-1-billion-to-jewish-social-service-providers
Comment posted April 13, 2009 @ 9:29 pm
Laurie
Comment posted February 26, 2009 @ 1:35 pm
President Obama’s stimulus bill does provide religious based institutions with money.
“The economic stimulus bill enacted by President Obama will provide $1 billion to Jewish nursing homes and social service agencies, according to the United Jewish Communities.”
I think perhaps this is referring to Jewish people as an ethnicity, not a religion…? Just a thought.
Comment posted April 30, 2009 @ 5:06 am
The author of this article, putting the subject itself aside, has created a one-sided opinion piece and not an objective article. Beware readers! But to the subject; I can see both sides of the legislator’s argument about the issue of funding. Wanting to prohibit funding of sports facilities [this is clear] and facilities used for sectarian worship [less clear]. The principal has merit, but it is poorly written as law, therefore the opposition to this law has a valid point. This law could be used to muzzle moderate activities in buildings of schools, where intellectual curiosity and academic freedom should rightfully be allowed. The writers use of “the religious right” is unfortunate as he seeks to label a group to make them scandalous rather than dealing with the particulars of the argument itself. He is attempting to project that if the religious right is supporting it, it must be bad. Those opposing this legislation understand that laws have unintended consequences, and this could be used to affect reasonable activities. Religion does not dominate our institutions and provides little threat of doing so. The legislators should rewrite this language to protect both the principal of free speech as well as the right to assemble. The author should turn on their objective switch.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment