King Banaian will not take the stand at the U.S. Senate contest. Norm Coleman’s legal team had sought to have the St. Cloud State University professor and conservative blogger testify that differences in the number of rejected absentee ballots in various counties could not be explained by chance. But Al Franken’s lawyers objected to the inclusion of Banaian as a witness, and in an order issued this evening the three-judge panel overseeing the contest rejected his potential testimony.
“The only question that can be decided in an election contest is which party received the highest number of legally cast votes, and therefore is entitled to receive the certificate of election, ” the order notes. “The court does not believe Banaian’s testimony would assist in determining the issues properly before it.”













4 Comments »
Comment posted February 18, 2009 @ 8:11 pm
I think I’m starting to see a light at the end of the tunnel…
Comment posted February 18, 2009 @ 8:30 pm
This is a guy who didn’t want to “waste the taxpayers’ money” with a recount when he was leading Franken by some 200 or so votes?? Yep, that’s what he said. So what’s his rationale, now?
Comment posted February 18, 2009 @ 9:51 pm
Good for the court realizing conservative bloggers aren’t exactly renowned as purveyors of accuracy. Nonetheless, watch for Coleman to raise this on appeal.
Comment posted February 18, 2009 @ 10:05 pm
Watch for Coleman to attempt to raise everything, including the ghost of Charles Nelson Reilly, on appeal.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment