A politician handing out wooden nickels in the midst of a historic economic recession is odd enough, but what state Rep. Jim Abeler suggests the worthless coins be used for — plugging gunshot wounds in one of Minneapolis’ higher crime neighborhoods — is even stranger.
On Feb. 16, residents of Minneapolis’ north side headed to St. Paul to lobby legislators on issues affecting them. The second annual “day on the hill” was spearheaded by the Northside Policy Action Coalition (NPAC), a group of organizations including the PEACE Foundation, Minneapolis Urban League, Northway Community Trust, KMOJ and others, and for many of the 70 mostly African-American youth who participated, it represented their first encounter with legislators.
Part of NPAC’s platform is to look at youth violence — a problem plaguing North Minneapolis — not just through the lens of the criminal justice system, but as a public health problem as well. And in anticipation of a bill now being drafted by Sen. John Marty and Rep. Paul Thissen, both Democrats, the group of some 200 north-side residents came to the state Capitol to share their stories. PEACE Foundation President Sondra Samuels said homicide is the top killer of African-American males between the ages of 15 and 18. At the Capitol last Monday, when youth were asked if they personally knew anyone who’d been the victim of a gun crime, “almost every one of them raise their hands,” Samuels recalled. “One girl said, ‘I’m tired of seeing my friends get shot.’”
But a response by Anoka Republican Abeler struck some as shocking. When youth regrouped with NPAC leaders after talking to legislators, they reported that Abeler passed out wooden nickels, tokens made for his re-election campaign, and said something to the effect of, “If you get shot, use this to plug the bullet hole.”
When confronted about it, Abeler responded that he only said it to the men (although, according to NPAC members, girls were present as well, and one boy ended up with a coin in his pocket). Cheryl Morgan-Spencer, community relations manager for the Minneapolis Urban League, returned one of the tokens to Abeler, with “some words” about the nickel. “Overall, it was very disturbing,” she said.
Abeler has not responded to multiple requests from the Minnesota Independent to clarify his comments, but he did offer an apology in an e-mail to a neighborhood resident. “I am certainly sorry for what I said, thoughtlessly and, sad to say, ignorantly,” he wrote. “I don’t think I could have chosen a poorer analogy even. But I am even sorrier and sadder for what those young people have experienced, and that it took this for me to come to even begin to understand it.” (Read the full letter at the end of this post.)
“People say things about the north side privately — rough and critical things,” said John Hoff, who first wrote about the incident on his blog, Johnny Northside. “And one of those things maybe just came out of his mouth in the presence of the people from the north side.”
Hoff said he’s concerned that Abeler’s behavior perpetuates myths about his neighborhood — which is home to the city’s largest African-American population and has long wrestled with crime and home foreclosures (disclosure: It’s also where this reporter lives) — without acknowledging the advances community leaders and activists have made in recent years.
“Some people are under the impression that if they even drive up Lyndale [Avenue] North they’ll be caught up in something,” he said. “They seriously think if they drive by the 4th Street Saloon they’ll be caught up in gunfire. … We have our problems but we don’t have them every five minutes. We deal with them. To me, what he said is the cartoon version of the north side.”
But to north-side resident Jeff Skrenes, “the bigger issue is it furthers a stereotype about the world and the place of young people in it.” For youth who are visiting the Capitol for the first time, novelty coins and jokes can leave quite an impression.
“It devalues civic engagement,” said Skrenes. “Even when you don’t agree, you should at least respect the fact that regular citizens have taken time out of their day to talk about issues important to them.”
Further, he doesn’t buy Abeler’s response: “He said, ‘I only said it for the boys.’ As if somehow, magically, the girls didn’t hear it. Even if that’s true, how does that make that statement OK?”
But Samuels from the PEACE Foundation sees Abeler’s words as a “gift in disguise.”
“It’s unfortunate, don’t get me wrong,” she said. “But there are a number of unfortunate things that in hindsight change the life of an organization.” The experience can help young people understand that “you do have a voice, you can set an agenda” and that they can move from “defending against to standing for.”
There’s another up-side. “We are not naïve enough to think we can get anything passed” — jobs programs for youth, “sensible gun laws,” re-entry training for ex-offenders, to name a few points on NPAC’s platform — “with just our north-side legislators,” Samuels said. “We need to have a coalition.”
And she sees Abeler as a potential partner. “Our mantra is: What’s good for the north side is good for the state,” she said. To that end, NPAC is hoping to enlist advocates from outside the neighborhood — including Abeler — and organizations elsewhere in Minnesota, as they’ve done with lobbying day partners such as St. Paul’s Citizens for a Safer Minnesota and a Duluth woman who testified last Monday about losing a child to gun violence. She says Abeler has agreed to meet with north Minneapolis residents — this time, on their turf.
“Our whole goal for going to the Capitol was to touch hearts and change minds,” Samuels said. “This was a nasty incident, but I don’t hold the incident against him. I’ve got to believe that a significant portion of our representatives have some Jim Abeler sentiment in them. That they just don’t get it.
“We have to assume that caring, decent people who are making the laws don’t know” first-hand what problems northsiders face, Samuels said.
“Just to be fair, if you’re not around it, if it’s not your world, how would you know?”
Abeler’s letter to a north Minneapolis resident:
Thank you for writing.
I have spent the last 36 hours or so getting educated in a few ways I didn’t expect. For starters and maybe most important to you, I am truly sorry for how the very nice visit from the northsiders and npac’ers finished up. Certainly in hindsight, I would do it different. Way different.
If you are interested in the context, the comment arose out of a discussion about how hard it was to bridge the gap on some matters, in this case gun laws. I thought the group should know just how hard of a project that they had tackled. Virtually impossible, I told them. I compared it to the controversies of the abortion debate. There was a man in the group who mentioned how hard it was to be in the middle, and I compared him to a soldier from the Civil War who wore a grey shirt and blue pants, who would have gotten shot by both sides. It may be helpful to you to know that the following comment was directed to that man, not one of the students. As they left, I suggested to him, the man, that the otherwise worthless wooden nickels could be used to patch up the bullet wounds he got in that fight.
I had little idea of what impact it would have had on the students there, and I can imagine how they might have taken it to be about something else. Bad choice of analogy, bad choice of words.
A few minutes later, a woman appeared in my doorway with two men, offering a very critical appraisal of the situation. I was a bit in shock.
The two male students who were there were out in my hallway a little later. I immediately apologized to them, and they went on their way with little comment.
Perhaps the students will be consoled to know that the several conversations I have had since then have made me aware of a whole different world than I am accustomed to, living in the northern suburbs. Guns in my town are used for hunting, are mostly locked in gun lockers, and rarely do we have any kind of trouble around that.
As I spoke with some colleagues and Heather again, they helped improve my understanding of how even the mention of guns or shooting brings on a whole complex of emotions, fear, and pain.
I am certainly sorry for what I said, thoughtlessly and, sad to say, ignorantly. I don’t think I could have chosen a poorer analogy even. But I am even sorrier and sadder for what those young people have experienced, and that it took this for me to come to even begin to understand it.
Perhaps you can convey to these young people that the world is full of people who mean well, but who mess it up through ignorance and lack of understanding. Please remind them that those people, like me, can learn and grow and that it is worth the effort.
Eleven years I have served, and I don’t recall any visits from a northside student group. Maybe it is good, after all, that they made the foray into my world.
I for one, am going to be a better servant of them, as well as my own district, for this experience.
I hope the practice they get in forgiving me will help them in the future as they go about forgiving others.
Respectfully,
Rep. Jim Abeler














11 Comments »
Comment posted February 25, 2009 @ 5:07 pm
tribalism is not helping our culture. there is increasingly little opportunity for people with different experiences, backgrounds, etc. to cross paths. and without that happening, there can be no understanding, dialogue, etc.
there is a value to creating and fostering communities with diversity … diversity of all kinds.
fewer people would be targets of offensive behavior, fewer people would look foolish (or worse).
Comment posted February 25, 2009 @ 11:15 pm
It was a horrible thing to say, but Abeler’s letter struck me as a heart-felt and sincere apology. It was above and beyond the usual political “I’m sorry if you chose to be offended” stuff. After reading it, I like Abeler better. I don’t live in his district and these days, I’d never vote Republican. But good on Jim Abeler for learning from his mistakes and sounding geniunely repentant.
Comment posted February 26, 2009 @ 9:39 am
Call him a ’slug’ pushing wooden nickels,is maybe all one can say; for what is a sad case of blatant arrogance and stupidity and insensitivity.
Then again, he is a Republican representative, so what more can one expect?
Comment posted February 26, 2009 @ 11:34 am
That actually is a thoughtful letter. He’s right that guns conjure up completely different responses in urban and rural areas. One groups thinks of guns and thinks of a threat to their lives, while the other thinks of threats to their way of life.
Comment posted February 26, 2009 @ 4:47 pm
Actually, some maturity displayed on both sides. Looks like some good will come of it.
Comment posted February 26, 2009 @ 6:57 pm
I’ve gotten to know Jim pretty well as a constituent and I do believe his apology is sincere. As someone who went from managing one of his opponent’s campaigns to endorsing him through an organization I belong to, I have found Abeler to be one of the few who can genuinely be moved to change his mind with good information and honest discussion. I may never agree with him on everything, but I know when I go in to see him, regardless of my party affiliation or background, I have a real chance of getting his support.
When he was one of the six Republicans who voted to override the Governor’s veto of the the transportation funding bill last session, he showed himself to be willing to take a personal risk for a good cause. He paid dearly for that choice politically. But at that moment, he became a far better representative. The sentiment in the letter is borne of committing to actually being the kind of leader too many only claim to be.
Comment posted February 27, 2009 @ 1:02 pm
There is no effort in the letter to deflect blame and he clearly articulates an understanding of why his comments were foolish and hurtful. His apology is sincere.
Representative Abeler also made this comment:
“If you are interested in the context, the comment arose out of a discussion about how hard it was to bridge the gap on some matters, in this case gun laws. I thought the group should know just how hard of a project that they had tackled. Virtually impossible, I told them. I compared it to the controversies of the abortion debate.”
The difficulty in addressing issues related to such hot button topics as guns and abortion is that they have been highly politicized. There is middle ground but it is like a demilitarized zone between two warring nations; scorched earth bounded by barbed wire. Representative Abeler is peering over the fence at friends and neighbors far away on the other side. He seems to be reaching out to break down these barriers and he deserves a great deal of credit for that. If there is a future for the Republican Party, it will be because of people like him.
Comment posted February 27, 2009 @ 1:25 pm
Thanks for all the comments. I agree that, while Abeler’s slip of the tongue was surprising and unfortunate, his response was thoughtful and smart.
As a postscript, he did email me the evening this story ran, apologizing that he was too busy to respond to my queries. He hadn’t yet read the piece, and offered no further comment on the incident.
Comment posted March 4, 2009 @ 10:27 am
So Abeler wrote a sincere mea culpa…ok; BUT what about the issue that the students and Northside folk wanted him to address in the first place? Is he now going to support measures that cub gun violence? Is he going to support programs that bring hope and relief to the African American community in North Minneapolis? If not then he can take his little apology letter and shove it.
Comment posted March 5, 2009 @ 11:02 am
Francisco,
That is a reasonable question that Representative Abeler should address. He says that he now understands the difference between his hunting guns locked in a gun safe and those weapons on the street that cause such havoc. He should act on that understanding.
I actually think that Mr Abeler, the person, has learned a valuable personal lesson. Unlike many of the voters in the district he represents, he seems capable of empathy and self examination. It would be courageous of him to act on his personal beliefs but if he gets too far out in front of the voters who elected him he puts his political career at risk. He has taken risks before however, perhaps he will again.
I have hunted since the age of 10 and I know the difference between guns that are used for hunting wild game and guns that are used for hunting humans. There is plenty of room for reasonable gun regulation, and as a lifelong hunter, I find it quite disturbing that hunting rights continue to be used as a political tool at the expense of human rights. We need to curb gun violence and get these handguns off the streets.
We also need to regulate the economic weapons that are being used to impoverish all but a few by allowing the siphoning off of local capital to offshore accounts. Much of the violence stems from a lack of economic opportunity for all people.
Comment posted March 13, 2009 @ 9:40 pm
I wonder if Democrats put aside the gun control issue they might make more progress on issues that would impact violence in communities at the source. I certainly would support gun laws or restriction but I question like Mr. Abeler if the chance of real reform is remote.
I wish the NCAP luck in their efforts in gun violence and control legislation but hope they continue to reach out and find support in the other parts of their platform they mentioned above such as offender re-entry programs, youth job training and other non-gun control programs.
I would think it would have a greater chance to impact on violence by giving youth job opportunities and returning offenders an option to stay away from gang activity, to provide help with dealing with the ravages of drugs on families and communities and to thereby reduce the risk factors besides guns that someone like Mr. Abeler may have a easier time selling to his base of support.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment