It’s a new era for media, as a Feb. 9 White House press conference underscored: President Barack Obama called on reporter Sam Stein, from the online-only Huffington Post, a historic first. But the news appears to be a bit slow getting to Minnesota. Rules governing the state House of Representatives still exclude online media outlets from getting access to the House floor.
But at noon today, that policy was scheduled to get a hearing, as online journalists will testify before the Minnesota House rules committee to lobby for a change of policy.
When this topic last came up in the House on Feb. 12, Rep. Tony Sertich, DFL-Chisholm, expressed his misgivings about amending House rules to grant such access.
“We don’t have a fully defined policy of what online media is,” said the House majority leader. “If it’s somebody who designs their own Web site and comes down to the Capitol, … we could be deluged with www.anybody.com walking through the door saying, ‘I’m the online media, let me have floor access.’ You think the House chamber is a ruckus … now, wait till all the bloggers get here and show up en masse.”
But one such “blogger” — who prefers to refer to his site Checks & Balances as an “e-zine” — thinks Sertich is missing the point.
“He’s got a fundamental flaw in his understanding of the Bill of Rights,” said Shawn Towle. “It’s not for government to decide what is media … [or] to in any way, shape or form try to limit, box in or impede anybody that wants to have the right to scrutinize, analyze and comment upon the activities of elected officials. They do have the ability to limit who has access to the floor of their body, … but they should have a universal rule about the treatment of all press, whether it’s print, broadcast or online. I’m fighting for equal treatment.”
Towle was to testify at today’s hearing, and today he filed with the sergeant-at-arms office to receive House press credentials, as did the Minnesota Independent’s Paul Demko and Andy Driscoll of KFAI’s “Truth to Tell.”
In an e-mail Monday night, Driscoll said that TruthToTell correspondent Marty Owings, an online radio host and blogger, was “yanked out of a public committee hearing today as he tried to monitor and record the public proceedings therein.”
The notion that the media platform should determine who gets to be on the House floor is riddled with problems. For example, will access change for Mary Lahammer when her intent is to blog for Twin Cities Public Television instead of report broadcast news? How about when Pioneer Press reporter Rachel Stassen-Berger covers the Statehouse for a Political Animal blog post instead of the print paper? And is it “radio” when MPR streams news online instead of over the airwaves?
And, as Towle asked, “If the Strib or PiPress moves to a strict online application, are you going to reject their press credentials?”
“I make my profession over analyzing, commenting on and reporting on political events in the state of Minnesota and have done so for 14 years,” said Towle, who’s e-zine is likely the first of its kind in Minnesota.
“What is it that people are intent to hide? If they haven’t figured out that they’re under close scrutiny – microscopic scrutiny – ever since they were elected, they’re a little naïve.”
Update: Online media access to state House falls prey to ‘procedural gimmicks’














7 Comments »
Comment posted February 24, 2009 @ 1:53 pm
Riddled with problems, indeed. The bloggers today are facing the same access problems that that urban neighbborhood, suburban and ethnic and special interest community papers have faced for many years. We St. Paul neighborhood papers had to battle to even get ONE desk in the St. Paul/Ramsey County City Hall/Courthouse press room. And don’t get me started about access to information.
It isn’t the government’s job to decide who is and who does not meet their definition of what is and is not media. If they need to make rules, work with the media community to do so.
Universal rules are needed but as someone who has had to argue for . . . well, decades, for equal access, I’ll just tell you it isn’t easy and your so-called major media colleagues will be of no help to you. . . unless THEY need something.
Comment posted February 24, 2009 @ 3:02 pm
Paul – Thank you for writing about this important issue. I thinks this speaks to the fundamental access of the Press and of our democracy. It is unfortunate that in meetings where the public is encouraged to attend, we the Press, cannot even stream live. TO be clear, this seems to be a problem in the House. On the Senate side things are much smoother and we are given unrestricted access to their hearings etc.
For whatever reason, we seem to be getting stonewalled. i don’t want to speculate, I just want this resolved. We are here everyday trying to bring our online viewers, listeners and readers unique content. We’re out EVERY DAY, which is more than I can say for some of the so called mainstream media.
We need people to step up and let these law makers know that it is no longer acceptable to restrict online Press access. Support HRA 007.
Comment posted February 24, 2009 @ 3:04 pm
that’s neighborhood. . . sorry about the spelling but some of us are slogging from budget meeting to budget meeting today. . . I seem to be hitting a county-state-city trifecta in a 12-hour period
Pingback posted February 25, 2009 @ 2:16 pm
[...] is practicing journalism has nothing to do with the method by which they distribute that work. As Paul Schmelzer wrote at the Minnesota Independent: The notion that the media platform should determine who gets to be on the House floor is riddled [...]
Comment posted February 28, 2009 @ 8:03 pm
I’m sure Erik Eskola will be there with scarf in hand to support this bill. Not.
http://minnesotaindependent.com/12671/video-independent-media-not-welcome-at-coleman-media-availability
Comment posted March 8, 2009 @ 7:42 pm
This is a battle that needs to be fought until it is won (!)
Pingback posted March 10, 2009 @ 7:25 am
[...] to press credentials. Representative Tony Sertich (D-Chisholm), chair of the House Rules Committee explained: “If it’s somebody who designs their own Web site and comes down to the Capitol, … we could [...]
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment