<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online media access to state House falls prey to &#8216;procedural gimmicks&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/27356/online-media-access-to-state-house-falls-prey-to-procedural-gimmicks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/27356/online-media-access-to-state-house-falls-prey-to-procedural-gimmicks</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Devil In The Details</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/27356/online-media-access-to-state-house-falls-prey-to-procedural-gimmicks/comment-page-1#comment-26105</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil In The Details</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=27356#comment-26105</guid>
		<description>&quot;...and lack of institutions to provide the House with recourse in the case of “bad information.”&quot;

Yeah, about that lack of &quot;recourse,&quot; that&#039;s the funny thing I like about the Constitutional protections afforded a free press. 

I&#039;m curious as to what kind of recourse a Government body would be interested in pursuing, and also what kind of information they would selectively pick and choose to report or address? Or are we talking about a Government body force-framing interpretation and consensus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;and lack of institutions to provide the House with recourse in the case of “bad information.”&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, about that lack of &#8220;recourse,&#8221; that&#8217;s the funny thing I like about the Constitutional protections afforded a free press. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious as to what kind of recourse a Government body would be interested in pursuing, and also what kind of information they would selectively pick and choose to report or address? Or are we talking about a Government body force-framing interpretation and consensus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane McClure</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/27356/online-media-access-to-state-house-falls-prey-to-procedural-gimmicks/comment-page-1#comment-25719</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=27356#comment-25719</guid>
		<description>This just smacks of picking the reporters state lawmakers like and don&#039;t like. Period. the First Amendment should be a big tent and all should be welcome. Honestly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just smacks of picking the reporters state lawmakers like and don&#8217;t like. Period. the First Amendment should be a big tent and all should be welcome. Honestly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Driscoll</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/27356/online-media-access-to-state-house-falls-prey-to-procedural-gimmicks/comment-page-1#comment-25695</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Driscoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=27356#comment-25695</guid>
		<description>Nice reporting - and providing a few chuckles here, Chris. Thanks for being there today.
Andy Driscoll
TruthToTell/KFAI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice reporting &#8211; and providing a few chuckles here, Chris. Thanks for being there today.<br />
Andy Driscoll<br />
TruthToTell/KFAI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
