Spin cycle: Attorneys trade barbs in RNC Eight cases
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 at 11:42 am

The RNC Eight, accused of a criminal conspiracy to wreak chaos during the Republican National Convention, are unlikely to go on trial for at least another six months. But the battle to shape public opinion on the high-profile case has been taking place since the moment of their arrests on the eve of the St. Paul convention in early September.
At a hearing Tuesday afternoon before Ramsey County District Court Judge Teresa Warner, attorneys for the prosecution and defense traded charges over which side had stepped over the line in attempting to manipulate media coverage. Previously Judge Salvador Rosas, who is no longer hearing the case, had warned both sides to be cautious in their public relations machinations.
The prosecution is now seeking an order barring the defense from leaking nonpublic evidence to the media. As evidence of the need for such a prohibition, Assistant County Attorney Heidi Westby cited a Star Tribune article from Dec. 1 based on the review of 1,000 pages of documents provided by a source. The reports detailed the infiltration of the RNC Welcoming Committee by undercover deputies from the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office.
Westby stated that attorneys for the eight defendants were the only ones with access to the documents. She further argued that the evidence includes private individual information, such as juvenile arrest records and financial data.
“They had not been disclosed to anyone else,” she said of the evidence. “This case should not be tried in the press.”
But attorneys for the two defendants in court today — Max Specktor and Monica Bicking — countered that Ramsey County officials are the ones guilty of trying to game the legal process through media manipulation. They noted that Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher and County Attorney Susan Gaertner have held press conferences and released evidence unavailable to defense attorneys.
Attorney Larry Leventhal, who represents Specktor, accused the prosecution of seeking to control media coverage by muzzling the defense. “I think she’s being exceedingly disingenuous,” Leventhal said of Westby. “They are attempting to monopolize the conversation.”
Attorney Bruce Nestor, who represents Bicking, said that the prosecution has consistently utilized evidence unavailable to the defense — including ballistics tests and lab reports — to tar their clients in the media. “For months my clients have been attacked in the press,” he said. “There was a purpose to that, and it’s to prejudice my clients to the public.”
Judge Warner did not rule on the matter. Similar preliminary hearings will be held for the remaining defendants — Erik Oseland, Eryn Trimmer, Garrett Fitzgerald, Luce Guillen-Givens, Nathanael Secor and Rob Czernik — over the next week. The cases are currently expected to go to trial in September. Only about 15 percent of the more than 700 people arrested during the RNC have been charged with crimes.
At the close of Tuesday’s hearing, Warner counseled both sides not to engage in behavior that will taint the case. “I won’t tolerate any games being played, any shenanigans,” she said. “We’ll try this case in the courtroom on the evidence that’s presented.”
(Photo courtesy of Friends of the RNC 8)
5 Comments
Comment posted February 25, 2009 @ 6:09 pm
Thank you for covering this! Can you also cover the related issues with Crass, and their action today on civil litigation? Those of us there, who saw the mass arrests, will always remember.
Comment posted February 25, 2009 @ 9:29 pm
I find the 6-month timeframe interesting. Susan Gaertner, after all, has already filed and is running for governor. As a prosecutor, it would be her job to evaluate evidence before bringing charges, but she has instead taken every wild accusation of Bob Fletcher at face value (100 officers hit with human feces, and other paranoid ravings). She can’t be that dumb or inexperienced that she actually believes Fletcher. So I wonder what the political timing considerations are here. DFL precinct caucuses will be a year from now. The party endorsement for governor will come in June, and the election in November 2010. What is she hoping for here? Can there really be that many naive Democrats in Greater Minnesota that she really stands a chance with this Death Wish strategy?
Comment posted February 26, 2009 @ 2:25 pm
“…evidence unavailable to the defense – including ballistics tests and lab reports – to tar their clients in the media.”
Did I miss something, or was Nestor speaking in generalities unrelated to the RNC case? (Or is he just off his rocker?) I can’t think of anything that’s come out anywhere about the case that would involve “ballistics tests”. If there were firearms tests being conducted, I’d think that would be fairly big news, regardless of how pro-”8″ your biases happen to run…
Comment posted March 5, 2009 @ 6:05 pm
In light of what I know about this case, the idea of Gaertner running for office turns my stomach, and will very likely get me involved much earlier in the campaign season than I normally would. The idea that a County Attorney is, by all appearances, trying to build her campaign on the trumped up charges against these young people, charges that could destroy or severely disrupt their life courses, is outrageous.
Gaertner, if you have any decency, drop out of the race now.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






