<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bachmann may say the unthinkable, but she&#8217;s &#8216;unsinkable&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/27617/the-unsinkable-michele-bachmann/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/27617/the-unsinkable-michele-bachmann</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Anderson</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/27617/the-unsinkable-michele-bachmann/comment-page-1#comment-26179</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=27617#comment-26179</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Eric.

With facts you have begun to dispel the myth that IP candidates just get republicans elected. This is a worn DFL whine who never seem to look internally but place blame externally for their loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Eric.</p>
<p>With facts you have begun to dispel the myth that IP candidates just get republicans elected. This is a worn DFL whine who never seem to look internally but place blame externally for their loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/27617/the-unsinkable-michele-bachmann/comment-page-1#comment-25821</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=27617#comment-25821</guid>
		<description>Bachmann is great for Democratic fundraising.  Other than making Minnesota look foolish, every time Bachmann opens her mouth, Democrats open their wallets and middle-of-the-road folks turn to the left.  It would be a problem if the 6th district elected a Republican who was not a head case, since they wouldn&#039;t produce money for Democrats.  Bang on, Michelle, bang on. Just think, with every appearance on tv you generate tens of thousands of dollars for liberal causes.  And we say, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bachmann is great for Democratic fundraising.  Other than making Minnesota look foolish, every time Bachmann opens her mouth, Democrats open their wallets and middle-of-the-road folks turn to the left.  It would be a problem if the 6th district elected a Republican who was not a head case, since they wouldn&#8217;t produce money for Democrats.  Bang on, Michelle, bang on. Just think, with every appearance on tv you generate tens of thousands of dollars for liberal causes.  And we say, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Steller</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/27617/the-unsinkable-michele-bachmann/comment-page-1#comment-25820</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Steller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=27617#comment-25820</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, Eric. Appreciate the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, Eric. Appreciate the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Ostermeier</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/27617/the-unsinkable-michele-bachmann/comment-page-1#comment-25819</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Ostermeier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=27617#comment-25819</guid>
		<description>While I didn&#039;t admittedly address the IP issue in my blog post, that is because it was a non-factor in the race. Bob Anderson was a right-of-center IP candidate (e.g. favoring deploying National Guard troops to guard the southern border), and not a &quot;Peter Hutchinson type.&quot; Plus, In the last SurveyUSA poll conducted just a few days before the election, Anderson was splitting the partisans almost exactly down the middle - 5% of Democrats and 6% of Republicans supported him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I didn&#8217;t admittedly address the IP issue in my blog post, that is because it was a non-factor in the race. Bob Anderson was a right-of-center IP candidate (e.g. favoring deploying National Guard troops to guard the southern border), and not a &#8220;Peter Hutchinson type.&#8221; Plus, In the last SurveyUSA poll conducted just a few days before the election, Anderson was splitting the partisans almost exactly down the middle &#8211; 5% of Democrats and 6% of Republicans supported him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

