
Dave Titus and St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman (right). Photo: Paul Demko
Last Friday morning St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman stepped up to a podium at the state Capitol, joined by a phalanx of cops and firefighters. The unmistakable message: Stop the cuts to public safety programs that Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s budget proposes.
While the press conference was typical Capitol stagecraft, it brought together some unusual bedfellows. The St. Paul Police Federation has hardly been among Coleman’s biggest fans. The union endorsed his opponent, then-incumbent Randy Kelly, four years ago and has frequently lambasted the Mayor’s handling of police issues. As recently as last fall, the police federation was running radio spots attacking the mayor for failing to meet its wage demands on a new labor contract.
But there was Dave Titus, president of the Police Federation, taking to the podium to echo the mayor’s warnings about looming local government aid (LGA) cutbacks. “Let’s make this very clear: LGA cuts will very much affect the safety of every officer, every firefighter and every citizen in this state,” Titus said. “That’s what LGA is: It’s public safety — bottom line.”
This unusual alliance was prompted by the very real specter of massive cuts to the beleaguered program. Under Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s initial proposal to close a projected $4.85 billion budget, the LGA program would be sliced by 15 percent in 2009 and then would take another 31 percent whack in 2010. Translated into dollars, this means $246 million in cuts over the next two years. That’s on top of $110 million unilaterally stripped from LGA in order to close a deficit in the current fiscal year.
While the looming budget deficit for 2009-10 is now projected to be slightly less ($4.6 billion), owing to relief from the federal stimulus bill, it’s still clear that LGA is headed for a severe haircut. Indeed, Pawlenty indicated earlier this week that the deficit adjustment would not significantly alter his budget proposal.
The prospect of such cuts has galvanized mayors and city officials across the state to lobby the Legislature to hold the line on LGA cutbacks. The Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities has created a Web site, thanklga.org, to spread the word about the potential impact of cuts. Individual firefighters and police officers will be at the Capitol in the coming weeks making the case for LGA funding.
“If the proposed cut that has been before the Legislature gets enacted, many of the folks that we see here today will have their jobs impacted,” Coleman said Friday morning. “They might not lose their jobs, but their co-workers will, because we simply can’t respond to the level of cuts that we’re talking about here without a significant reduction in services across the board.”
“We need to fix this,” said Titus. “We need to save public safety.”
Pawlenty “held line” on public safety budget but slashed LGA
In announcing his fiscal plan, Pawlenty boasted that it would hold the line on cuts to public safety, but that claim was disingenuous. While state agencies such as the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension wouldn’t be subject to the budget ax, cuts to LGA would have a severe effect on police and fire departments across the state.
LGA was initially created to level the playing field for cities that struggle to draw sufficient tax revenues from local sources. Small towns with elderly populations and minuscule property tax revenues rely on it, as do larger cities with significant numbers of poor residents.
The town of Babbitt, for instance, located 100 miles north of Duluth and with a population of roughly 1,600 people, is slated to receive $387,600 in LGA funds in 2009 — or nearly 20 percent of the town’s general fund. Under Pawlenty’s budget proposal, however, Babbitt would lose roughly $460,000 in LGA funds over the next two years.
The town currently has four police officers. When one cop retired in the fall, his position wasn’t filled. Babbitt recently explored contracting out its police services to the St. Louis County Sheriff’s Department but ultimately decided against it.
“That was more expensive than doing it ourselves,” says City Administrator Pete Pastika. “Then we would also lose control of the police force.”
In Willmar, 14 firefighters recently retired. The fire department only has sufficient funds to replace five of them, dropping the force from 42 to 33. Now the western Minnesota city of 18,000 is looking at a loss of more than $1.2 million in LGA funds over the next two years.
Mayor Lester Heitke estimates property taxes would need to be raised 27 percent to make up for the shortfall.
“We know there’s a budget deficit problem,” he says. “We understand that we have to help solve this problem. What we’re asking is that it be solved in an equal and fair way.”
St. Paul: “It’s impossible”
The cuts facing the state’s bigger municipalities are on a much larger scale. St. Paul is slated to receive just over $62 million in LGA funds in 2009. Under Pawlenty’s proposal, however, that figure would be trimmed by $7.7 million this year and another $17 million in 2010.
While Pawlenty has suggested that cities could deal with such cuts without affecting fire and police departments, the reality is that such services constitute a huge swath of municipal budgets. In St. Paul’s case, funding for public safety eats up nearly two-thirds of the city’s general fund.
“There’s no scenario under which we can do this without impacting public safety,” says Sara Grewing, Coleman’s chief of staff. “The governor just needs to look at the numbers. It’s impossible.”
Budget scenarios drawn up by the heads of St. Paul’s departments make clear how stark the cuts would have to be under Pawlenty’s proposal. The fire department estimates that it would need to shave 59 firefighters and three administrative staff to close the budget hole.
“We would have firefighters that would be told, ‘Thanks for putting your life in danger, but we don’t need you anymore,’” says Chris Parsons, secretary of St. Paul Firefighters Local 21.
Parsons notes that the number of emergency runs the department performs has nearly doubled over the last two decades, while staffing has remained nearly stagnant. He argues that reducing personnel by 59 firefighters would put lives at risk.
“I care about the people that I work with and the citizens of St. Paul,” he says. “If we’re not safe, they’re not safe. We need to be able to do our jobs safely.”
Cuts to the police department would be equally steep. Under the scenario laid out by Police Chief John Harrington, the department would lay off 90 employees, including 67 sworn officers. It would also leave open 51 police officer slots currently vacant.
In his memo detailing the potential cuts, Harrington warns that the reductions would come at a perilous time.
“Due to the current economic and employment situation our city, state and country face, we can expect a steadily increasing rise in robberies, burglaries, domestic assaults and numerous fraud and theft crimes,” he writes. “If history is our best teacher, during times of economic distress, drug use, mental health issues and depression have become more acute. This rise will translate into increased calls for service which will tax even further our already limited resources.”













11 Comments »
Comment posted March 6, 2009 @ 10:00 am
I’d take it out of the police departments. Maybe they could quit stalking drivers all over town giving out traffic tickets.
Comment posted March 6, 2009 @ 12:07 pm
As long as there are enough cops to go out and arrest pot smokers–or spy on war protesters–there are too many cops on the street. I’m sick of all the talk about “threats” to public safety if cops’ budgets are cut. You could whack 100 cops from the payroll and still have plenty left to ensure public safety. The only threat would be to the safety of profits for Dunkin Donuts.
Comment posted March 6, 2009 @ 7:44 pm
We need our police officers and firefighters. In this economic downfall, crime is increasing. Public safety is paramount. Think about calling for a police officer and no one answers or your house/apt is on fire and no one can respond. Call Governor Pawlenty instead and see if he responds.
Comment posted March 7, 2009 @ 3:54 pm
Bob, some of those traffic tickets get drunk drivers off the road. Some tickets reduce other types of dangerous driving too–speeding, reckless driving, running red lights, etc. Do you object to that?
Comment posted March 8, 2009 @ 8:10 pm
Has the city looked into contracting out the paramedic/ambulence services now provided by the firefighters? Might be cheaper?? Union would hate it…but times are a changing….
Comment posted March 8, 2009 @ 8:26 pm
Hey, yeah. St. Paul could simply outsource those services to India or Pakistan. That would be much cheaper.
Comment posted March 9, 2009 @ 8:54 am
Interesting (and horrifying) to read that Minnesota in one of the national leaders in incarcerating individuals (top 5th of the Nation, as reported in MN Independent’s front page article today.) Not only do we need to ask questions such as “are we enforcing the right laws?” We also need to ask, “Do we simply have too many cops?” When I saw we are side by side with Texas as having the dubious distinction of a top incarcerating state, I got a little sick to my stomach. Somehow I thought we were a more progressive, forward-thinking state. What have we become? Highest taxes, highest rates of incarceration, massive budget shortfalls. It’s no coincidence that these factors all coincide with one another. Scale back the police force and see what happens. Don’t give them a blank check to do whatever they wish. The fear mongering that we’ll go into a tailspin of crime escalating out of control is not founded on any kind of empirical data. It’s just fear mongering for the sake of bolstering the bureaucracy that is law enforcement. If we want to keep and create jobs, let’s not do it in the name of putting more people in prison. Don’t let the prison industry be the leading employment growth area in the state. Don’t live in fear.
Comment posted March 9, 2009 @ 2:49 pm
No Taxes, no taxes, this is what Gov Tim always says. Then he cuts the aid to county and local governments throwing the tax burden on the property owners. Just because he solves His problem in a backward way does not mean this is not a Tax Increase.
How long will the voters let these “no tax” people stay in power?
Comment posted March 9, 2009 @ 3:08 pm
“How long will the voters let these “no tax” people stay in power?”
They will stay in power until we either get runoff or IRV in elections or the Democrats run a good candidate for Governor. I was not at all happy with Skip Humphrey, Roger Moe, or Mike Hatch.
Just my opinion.
Comment posted March 11, 2009 @ 11:21 pm
Hey Bemidjimike,
All you have to do is look across the river to Mpls to see the deal St. Paul residents gets with fire providing the paramedics. Both cities fire budgets are about 50 million with St.Paul being slightly lower. Here is the big difference. St. Paul firefighter paramedics bring in 12 million dollars in revenue. When adjusted that makes St. Paul fire expenses are around 40 million that’s 20% lower than Mpls fire department. Cardiac survival rates: St.Paul 20%, Minneapolis is same as the national average of 4-8%. St. Paul paramedic average response time 4:30, paramedic providers in Mpls 6-12 minutes(very guarded giving poor response time). So to recap. St. Paul firefighters provide both firefighting and paramedic service and Minneapolis on provides firefighting and basic life support and St. Paul does it for LESS.
Comment posted May 26, 2009 @ 10:02 am
STOP THE GARAUNTEED PENSIONS-GIVE 3% OF THEIR WAGE AS THE MATCH TO A 401K RETIREMENT PLAN LET THEM DECIDE AS TO WHAT THEY WANT TO CONTRIBUTE. POLICE,FIREMAN,SOCIAL WORKERS,TEACHERS-ALL STATE WORKERS.THIS WOULD SAVE ALOT OF MONEY.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment