Fear of prospectors in wind country unfounded, so far

By Tom Elko
Wednesday, March 11, 2009 at 7:54 am
Wind farm (Wikicommons)

Wind farm (Wikicommons)

Minnesota is already big into wind, and it could be much bigger. The state currently has a wind capacity of 1752 megawatts (MW), fourth highest in the nation, but has an estimated potential power output of 75,000 MW according to the American Wind Energy Association.

In 2007, Gov. Tim Pawlenty signed into law a requirement that 25 percent of the states energy come from renewable sources by 2025. Many landowners in South-Western Minnesota began fearing the arrival of prospectors driving up the price of land in advance of a “wind boom.” Later that year an amendment to Minnesota Statutes Section 500.30 was passed to address this concern by requiring the termination of a wind easement, “if a wind energy project on the property to which the easement or lease applies does not begin commercial operation within the seven-year period.”

Wind developers complained the seven-year limit posed an impediment to legitimate development and in the 2008 session the legislature responded by repealing the changes effective 2010 and ordering the Office of Energy Security (OES) to convene a work group of interested parties and investigate the factual evidence for land prospecting.

The OES report (pdf) was recently released and found no factual evidence that there has ever been an instance of land prospecting for wind easements, but there’s no real reason why there shouldn’t be land prospectors. The report finds that “given the similarities between wind lease rights and oil and gas lease rights, and the well-documented history of speculation in the latter, a reasonable person might well be concerned that such speculation could also arise in wind leases.”

The proper Minnesotan thing to do now would be to convene a work group to find out why it is the prospectors don’t like us.

Comments

4 Comments

Hindsight - From Minnesota 2020 » Blog Archive » 3/11 Today in Our Sights
Pingback posted March 11, 2009 @ 10:10 am

[...] Fear of prospectors in wind country unfounded, so far. (Minnesota Independent) [...]


Texas Wind Power Museum Shows Way to Sustainable Future - Voice of America | Utility Compare . Com
Pingback posted March 12, 2009 @ 9:01 am

[...] transmission line proposal gets mixed reaction … Pioneer PressKansas City infoZine - Minnesota Independent No topics for this [...]


jonerik
Comment posted March 14, 2009 @ 12:55 am

I heard that NSP (now Xcel Energy) bought up all the good sites years ago (at least in SW Minnesota). As usual the reform comes after the horse has been stolen from the barn.


Line Cost
Comment posted March 16, 2009 @ 12:02 pm

So we only need 12 billion in transmission lines to get the wind from the western MN plains.
And that line goes right next to the failed proposed coal plant. Better to get less efficient wind generation
closer to the cities like Duluth, Rochester, metro counties than spend 12,000 MW worth of wind generation
for a transmission line out there that was planned for a coal plant.


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.