Wednesday afternoon, Norm Coleman’s attorney, Fritz Knaak, officially responded to news that Wikileaks.org had posted information indicating that sensitive data about Coleman donors has been exposed. Following a press release by Wikileaks.org earlier in the day, which stated the data exposure was the “result of sloppy handling by the campaign,” Knaak characterized the presence of the database’s contents as “theft” and vowed to see the perpetrator(s) behind bars. Read the full statement:
COLEMAN FOR SENATE STATEMENT ON STOLEN DONOR AND SUPPORTER DATA
The following statement was released by Coleman for Senate Legal Counsel, Fritz Knaak:
Last evening, we began to receive emails and phone calls from individuals who indicated they have been contacted, via email, by the email address: press-office@wikileaks.org.
The email stated that this organization was in possession of confidential and private information concerning the person’s financial data that we suspect may have been obtained through a breach of the Coleman for Senate Website.
We immediately contacted federal law enforcement authorities who have initiated an investigation into this matter. In addition, at approximately 8:10 a.m. this morning, we sent an email to those donors and supporters we believe may have been affected by this breach.
It is our intention to pursue all legal options available to us to identify who is in possession of this confidential information, how they obtained it and to do what we can legally do to prevent them from distributing it;
Let me be perfectly clear: We believe a federal crime has been committed. This information has been stolen. And, stealing private, confidential information is illegal.
We intend to fully pursue all legal options available, working with all appropriate local, state and federal authorities to identify the criminals who stole this information and to seek the most severe punishment available for their crimes.
When this individual or individuals are located, we intend to see they are prosecuted. That they are convicted. And that they spend as much time behind bars as is allowed by law.
At this time it appears that several thousand donors may have had their credit card information compromised. To what end, and for what purpose, that we do not know. If any individual used a credit card to make an online contribution to the Coleman for Senate Campaign, we urge them to contact their credit card company and cancel that credit card;
As you may recall, in late January our Coleman for Senate website crashed due to heavy volume, raising concerns as to whether the site had been compromised.
At that time we contacted federal law enforcement authorities who immediately began investigating this matter in conjunction with our vendors who ran our website.
At the conclusion of the law enforcement authorities’ initial investigation, they could not provide us with any evidence that such accusations were accurate — in other words, based on their initial review of our server, they did not discover that any individual had been able to obtain confidential, personal financial information.
As you might expect, this investigation is ongoing — and with this latest incident, the investigation will likely go to a new level of urgency.
The purpose or motive behind this attack is not clear. However, as we are engaged in a critical legal contest in the Minnesota courts that has a national impact on the make-up of the United States Senate, it should be abundantly obvious that this situation is extremely serious.
We are reviewing all potential and motives behind this attack, and we will not cease in our efforts to keep our supporters and donors informed of this situation. Their privacy and confidentiality is of utmost importance to us and this campaign. And, we intend to use all legal means at our disposal to protect them, and to bring these individuals who have committed this act to justice.













8 Comments »
Comment posted March 11, 2009 @ 5:09 pm
Gee, I copied and pasted some recipes off the internet. Made a tasty pork roast.
Maybe it was somebody’s secret recipe. It didn’t say it was, but it could have been. It said it was someone’s mother’s recipe. What if ma wanted her recipe to be secret?
I suppose I’ll go to jail for as long as the law allows.
Comment posted March 11, 2009 @ 5:30 pm
Coleman attorney calls database leak ‘theft,’ vows to put perp behind bars
Well, I guess Fritz will just have to add another charge to the many ol’ Smokescreen appears to be racking up….
Comment posted March 11, 2009 @ 5:56 pm
I’ll tell you who needs to be prosecuted: Norm Coleman’s campaign, with a severe fine and liability for paying for the cleanup from their mess.
Theft? It’s not theft if Coleman publishes his own database file on their website. Anyone who can visit his website can download his database. Should they all spend time behind bars?
I call on Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson to take the campaign to court for violations of data laws (PDF).
Comment posted March 11, 2009 @ 7:56 pm
When the leak was noticed the day after initial report by a woman in her blog, I understand that it was still possible to navigate and see the contents of the directory. I heard that the database was nearly 4 gig of data. Seems surprising to leave it unencrypted in a directory, let alone a directory that simply had not been secured with ‘touch’ or .htaccess. Interesting too, that a lawyer would describe downloading a file via web browser as theft. Me thinks they doth protest too much. Is it still unsecured?
Comment posted March 11, 2009 @ 8:07 pm
Casual browser, The file that was on the Coleman camp’s directory was 250 mb compressed, but more than 4 GB unstuffed. It may have been unsecured for a long time, but once it was discovered it was locked down quickly. On Jan. 28, I wrote about the breach at 10:30 pm, but by 11:40 it was password protected: http://minnesotaindependent.com/24817/crashgate-reveals-unprotected-database-on-colemans-site
Comment posted March 11, 2009 @ 8:14 pm
What will Mr. Knack do if it turns out a campaign member was responsible, pull a Bush? (That’d be saying you’ll be tough on who leaks the name of a CIA secret operative, only to do abolutely nothing when it turns out to involve your political advisor and your vice president.)
Comment posted March 12, 2009 @ 7:25 am
I downloaded a picture of a nekkid woman once. I will call the U.S. Attorney’s office and turn myself in for peeping tomfoolery.
Comment posted March 12, 2009 @ 8:25 am
Hey Fritz, does not sound like a leak to me. Sounds more like a bonhead in the camapign was cutting corners. Your blaming everyone but the responable party sounds like a cheap lawyer trick, deny & lie is what lawyers do best.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment