<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calling it &#8216;dumb,&#8217; GE&#8217;s Welch quits as high priest of shareholder-value cult</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/29058/calling-it-dumb-ges-welch-quits-as-high-priest-of-shareholder-value-cult/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/29058/calling-it-dumb-ges-welch-quits-as-high-priest-of-shareholder-value-cult</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonerik</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/29058/calling-it-dumb-ges-welch-quits-as-high-priest-of-shareholder-value-cult/comment-page-1#comment-26899</link>
		<dc:creator>jonerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=29058#comment-26899</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;neutron jack&quot; was misunderstood. I&#039;ve never cared for the fellow&#039;s ideas myself but he seems to be repudiating them himself here in the sense that he&#039;s saying the maximization of shareholder value as an end in itself is wrong. What he&#039;s saying is that it&#039;s insane to make shareholder value i.e. stock value, the be all and end all of your corporate existence. Employees, your product and your customers need to be first. The shareholder&#039;s value is maximized when your the goals are focused on your employees, your product and your customers. That&#039;s pretty conventional corporate marketing theory. And in that he&#039;s right and is probably coming as close to an admission of being wrong as you&#039;re ever going to see from a guy like Welch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;neutron jack&#8221; was misunderstood. I&#8217;ve never cared for the fellow&#8217;s ideas myself but he seems to be repudiating them himself here in the sense that he&#8217;s saying the maximization of shareholder value as an end in itself is wrong. What he&#8217;s saying is that it&#8217;s insane to make shareholder value i.e. stock value, the be all and end all of your corporate existence. Employees, your product and your customers need to be first. The shareholder&#8217;s value is maximized when your the goals are focused on your employees, your product and your customers. That&#8217;s pretty conventional corporate marketing theory. And in that he&#8217;s right and is probably coming as close to an admission of being wrong as you&#8217;re ever going to see from a guy like Welch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/29058/calling-it-dumb-ges-welch-quits-as-high-priest-of-shareholder-value-cult/comment-page-1#comment-26839</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=29058#comment-26839</guid>
		<description>Wow. And out of the other side of his face, old man Welch is crabbing about Obama and administration &quot;demonizing Wall Street and shareholders.&quot;

This guy is, has been, will always be &quot;Neutron Jack.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. And out of the other side of his face, old man Welch is crabbing about Obama and administration &#8220;demonizing Wall Street and shareholders.&#8221;</p>
<p>This guy is, has been, will always be &#8220;Neutron Jack.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/29058/calling-it-dumb-ges-welch-quits-as-high-priest-of-shareholder-value-cult/comment-page-1#comment-26835</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=29058#comment-26835</guid>
		<description>Leave it to TheDeal.com to position economic philosophy as though it were physical science.

Gravity is not a choice.  Private property, markets, and currency are all philosophical constructs that are different in all cultures and across all periods of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave it to TheDeal.com to position economic philosophy as though it were physical science.</p>
<p>Gravity is not a choice.  Private property, markets, and currency are all philosophical constructs that are different in all cultures and across all periods of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

