Bachmann wants Minnesotans ‘armed and dangerous’ against Obama energy policy

violent opposition to regulating CO2 emissions?
violent opposition to returning money to the victimized middle class?

Imagine the outrage if some leftist/anarchist were to say the same things.

As much as I favor free speech for everyone, for a member of Congress to urge armed resistance against lawful actions of the US government crosses the line. Her speech is sedition, and (according to section 2383 of title 18 of the US Code), she is not only subject to being locked up for ten years, but she is “incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

It is curious that someone such as Ms. Bachmann, who espouses the virtues of Christianity, should use such violent terms as “armed and dangerous” to rally people to her cause. Tell me, what would Jesus do? Recall Sarah Palin’s shout out to the Prayer Warriors and the use by otherwise people of faith in all matters of race bating at McCain/Palin rallies. Perhaps Bachmann has joined the cause now promoted by Glenn Beck and Chuck Norris to secede from the Union. They would rather tear this country apart (or at least use rhetoric suggesting such) rather than try to work with the Obama Administration to fix the ills of this country. Nevermind that we are now reaping the greedy, corrupt, and asinine policies have been thrust upon us over years of Republican governance.

Tell you what, Ms. Bachmann, since you dub yourself a “foreign correspondent” perhaps that makes you ineligible to serve as a representative in the US House of Representatives. Obviously you consider Government as the enemy. Perhaps it is time for you to step aside and allow someone who has the best interest of her constituents at heart rather than her narrow-minded loyalties to the likes of Dobson, et al.

Your rhetoric only exposes your hypocrisy. Jesus would want us to feed the poor, help the disadvantaged among us, afford our neighbors a chance to find a job and keep their homes. He would not be coming in locked and loaded.

The “people” who voted for Bachmann should be ashamed of themselves.

What would Jesus do? I’ll tell what Jesus would do, he would open an can o whoopass.

So is she advocating a revolution? Can we assume she has declared war on the US government and is leading an armed rebellion? What a loser.

Someone is rewriting history again:
Only one problem with Bachmann’s speil. Jefferson was encouraging a revolt to stop free trade, which Bachmann supports.

QUOTE
Jefferson airs his sentiments in a letter to James Madison on January 30, 1787, expressing justification for the series of protests led by Daniel Shay and a group of 1,200 farmers.

Jefferson also writes of his concern over John Jay’s impending negotiations with Spain. Under consideration would be proposals to extend privileges in Spanish ports to American ships, while providing navigation rights on the Mississippi River to Spain.

In his letter to Madison, Jefferson expresses his belief that the agreement might be interpreted as opening up the Mississippi to Spanish rule, thus provoking a war between settlers in the west and Spain, and eventually, dividing the nation.

http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/summer/letter.html

Voted YES on promoting free trade with Peru. (Nov 2007)
Voted NO on assisting workers who lose jobs due to globalization. (Oct 2007)
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Michele_Bachmann.htm

Bachmann already is dangerous, and she’s only armed with a bully pulpit.
I can’t wait until she starts to tell us who she actually wants shot.

PLEASE, for the LOVE OF HUMANITY !!! Minnesotans, put this LUNATIC away !!!!

VOTE THE CRAZIES OUT OF OFFICE FOR ALL TIME !!!

We are talking ‘ sedition ‘ here, if not COMPLETE & utter delusion & I am sorry that I need bring this to the fore, BUT, YOU VOTED THIS LOONY INTO OFFICE !!!
There is NOT ENOUGH medication on the planet ta make this CRACK POT palatable…
This, my friends, is ” a bad machine “…SHUT ‘ER DOWN !!!!

[...] Witness the attempt by the left (and the occasional member of the MSM) to convince America that outspoken conservative member of Congress Michelle Bachmann is calling for insurrection because she used the phrase “armed and [...]

treason ~

1. the offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. a violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state.
3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.

Lock her up !

I think we need to cut to the chase and see who is paying her. What big corporation that is funding her campaigns is so virulently against this Energy tax??

[...] hardly meets the scale of the legislation. This comes at the same time that Michelle Bachmann calls people to arms about Obama’s energy policy and Sean Hannity questions whether or not we should instigate a [...]

[...] she get around to dozens of talk shows – now Michelle Bachmann, who said she wanted citizens “armed and dangerous” over Barack Obama’s proposed energy tax has been appointed to the House GOP American Energy [...]

[...] [...]

Follow the money…

[...] belonged to a church that thought the Pope was “the anti-Christ;” and recently advocated armed revolution in response to Obama’s energy policy, so the Fawkes thing actually rates pretty low on the [...]

The money for all these treasonous actions is coming from the corporate elite who are buying the U.S. Government. The Koch Family Foundation ulterior motive eliminate government and usurp USA with anarchy. David & Charles Koch – Koch Family Foundation are funding the tea party and other faux groups through their foundations; for example: Americans for Prosperity (AFP).
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Americans_for_Prosperity

American Legislative Exchange Council is lobbying orgnization that strong-arms legislation, and is funded by corporations.
http://www.alecwatch.org/report.html

America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) – lobbyists for the health industry is funding anti-health.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/27/ahip-lobbying-publicoption/

[...]  armed and dangerous or [...]

At least one decent law-abiding citizen of Arizona acted her advice in Tucson on January 9, 2011.

[...] for example, Michele Bachmann, who stated on right wing radio: “I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax because we [...]

I want Meeechele to grow a brain, but that won’t happen.

They are bullies, with bully ideology, in bully churches, who raise litle bullies, and want their schools to be bullies, and they like it that way, with their bully language, and they mean it that way, and then the light comes on and they scurry back under the victim rug. Its their theocratic bully schtick.

[...] [...]

[...] Such provocative language includes Rep. Michele Bachmann calling for her constituents to be “armed and dangerous,” Beck fantasizing about killing Michael Moore, and Fox News allowing its on-air [...]

[...] confrontation with their government, as related by Andy Birkey in The Minnesota Independent: In March 2009 on WWTC, Bachmann said, “I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax because we need [...]

[...] confrontation with their government, as related by Andy Birkey in The Minnesota Independent: In March 2009 on WWTC, Bachmann said, “I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax because we need [...]

[...] legislation, which proposed using the powers of the free market to create carbon exchanges, posed an existential threat to all Americans: “I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy [...]