Minnesota politicos are asking themselves: When is a joke not a joke?
Republicans hope that by disseminating jokes made by Al Franken, the comedian turned Democratic U.S. Senate candidate, they can undermine his campaign to unseat Republican Norm Coleman. Michael Brodkorb, a Republican operative and sole writer of the blog Minnesota Democrats Exposed, has been delving into Franken’s past to find instances where Franken has made light of the struggles of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. The few instances he has found have been heavily promoted — even included in a video for Coleman’s campaign.
The jokes have also put off a few GLBT members of the DFL.
At a recent forum held for the GLBT community by attorney Mike Ciresi, one of Franken’s opponents for the DFL nomination, it was clear that some found Franken’s humor objectionable. Former DFL state Sen. Allan Spear, who made headlines in the early 1970s as one of the nation’s first openly gay elected officials, introduced Ciresi. Spear said that unlike comedian Franken, Ciresi takes GLBT issues seriously. Spear cited the attacks on Franken by Republicans using Franken’s past jokes against him as a real problem — and a reason for the community to support Ciresi and defeat Franken for the chance to replace Coleman.
I asked Jeremy Hanson, an openly gay longtime activist who co-hosted the Ciresi forum if the jokes influenced his decision to support Ciresi. He said he agreed with Spear. “Part of the reason I’m supporting Mike Ciresi for U.S. Senate is because I know he takes seriously the challenges that GLBT people face and I know that as our senator he will take seriously the fight for GLBT equality and justice,” he said in an interview. “It’s unfortunate when GLBT people are needlessly used as fodder for political satire or humor.”
With a choice of DFL senatorial candidates, including Franken, who overwhelmingly support the issues important to gays and lesbians, voters have to ask themselves: Is this a real issue or a distraction? Are the jokes irrelevant to the campaign? Or do they tell us something about the man who would be senator?
Some notable jokes being spread by the Republicans include a 1976 appearance at Harvard in which he joked that a campus club was dominated by homosexuals and said he was glad a gay member of the club had been murdered. The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that after Franken spoke, his smile ” became so broad it pushed his eyes shut. He couldn’t stand it any longer. ‘Put that in, put that in,’ Franken laughed, leaning over the desk. I’d love to see that in The Crimson.” In other words, he was trying to be outrageous.
Republican operatives are also citing an off-color remark that Franken made about Elton John and a comment after watching presidential candidate Pat Buchanan rail against GLBT people: “No one likes a gay bashing joke better than me, but this was serious.” The editing of the clip obscures the fact that Franken was responding to Buchanan’s tirade with sarcasm.
Franken faced questions about his sense of humor in late January when he appealed for support of the Stonewall DFL, the party’s GLBT caucus. Held at the Hennepin County Government Center, in front of the Stonewall screeners and several audience attendees, Franken retold his Elton John joke. The original joke goes like this:
“Actually, and this is totally true, for the first six months after 9/11, I put three baseballs in my carry-on bag. I am blessed with an unusually accurate throwing arm and wanted more than anything to thwart a hijacking by beaning a terrorist. How American is that?! I imagined The New York Post headline: ‘Franken Beans Hijacker: Terrorist Hit In Face With More Balls Than Elton John.’”
The scene was captured on video by a Republican “tracker,” and the Stonewall screeners were largely amused. Clearly that joke, at the expense of the flamboyant singer-songwriter, struck the GLBT Democrats as more funny than offensive.
Copies of the screening questionnaires from the Stonewall endorsement process show that each of the three candidates — Franken, Ciresi and St. Thomas professor Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer — has essentially the same stands on hate crime, gay marriage and other issues important to GLBT voters (thanks to blogger Eva Young, the screening questionnaires are publicly available here, here and here). Ultimately, the Stonewall DFL did not endorse a candidate and rated all three as outstanding.
The stances of the three DFLers differ considerably from those of Coleman. The Republican broke with the party line to vote for the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act, which was strongly supported by the Democratic candidates and GLBT groups. But Coleman supported the Defense of Marriage Act, which seeks to block gays from marrying. As mayor of St. Paul in the 1990s, Coleman refused to acknowledge Twin Cities Pride, the most important GLBT community event each year. Franken happily marched in the parade that Coleman refused to recognize.
That a Republican operative and the Republican Party of Minnesota are circulating these jokes — as well as demanding GLBT community members respond to them — is disingenuous. The Republican Party of Minnesota has an abysmal record when it comes to GLBT equality, and the statements made and policies pushed by the party damage the community. The hypocrisy makes it that much harder to have a discussion of the jokes themselves — and adds nothing to the debate over the policy issues at stake in the election.
The omission of context further discredits the Republicans strategy against Franken. For example, Franken’s jokes in support of the community are omitted. He once joked during a discussion of marriage equality that being gay was much harder than being black. “It’s harder being gay — because you don’t have to tell your parents you’re black,” he quipped.
He also took on former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich over the issue of marriage equality and Gingrich’s own admitted infidelity, asking: “Newt, don’t you want for a gay couple what you had with your first wife? Don’t you want what comes with that — that bond of fidelity that you had with your second wife?”
A recent editorial in the Mac Weekly, the school newspaper for Macalester College, widely known as one of the most progressive in the nation, had this to say about the jokes and Franken’s policy position. “Though Franken took flak from commentators for an alleged participation in an off-color anti-gay skit in the 1970s, he describes himself as solidly pro-adoption rights for same-sex couples, and pro-same-sex marriage, and he boasts the endorsement of GLBT community champion and openly gay state Sen. Scott Dibble (DFL-Minneapolis).”
Along with Dibble, Franken has secured a number of other endorsements form the gay community. City Council Member Jeff Anderson, Duluth’s first openly gay elected official, is on record as supporting Franken. Most importantly, Franken has the support of Phil, Randi and Jake Reitan, a Minnesota family of nationally known advocates of LGBT equality.
The other two Democratic candidates have also garnered GLBT endorsements.
In addition to Spear, Ciresi has the support of Rick Stafford, chair of the Democratic National Committee’s GLBT Caucus.
Nelson-Pallmeyer has the support of Rep. Karen Clark, DFL-Minneapolis, who is the longest-serving lesbian elected official in the country. He also gained the support of Ann Bancroft, a teacher, a lesbian and a world-renowned Arctic and Antarctic explorer. Also supporting Nelson-Pallmeyer is openly gay Minneapolis City Council Member Gary Schiff.













10 Comments »
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 5:38 pm
Exactly what MDE wanted. Turning something that is a non-issue into an issue is exactly what MDE/Republicans are great at. To position Franken as weak on GLBT issues by any means based off of this kind of stuff out of context is the kind of stuff that caters to the sound-bite crazed folks… but yet people keep turning it into baseless “news.” It’s upsetting that the media and bloggers consider this kind of crap worthy of even writing about. That and he’s a proven liar over and over again. Yet bloggers, and even the Star Tribune, TPT’s Almanac and other sources still regard MDE as a source of information. Drives me up the wall that people give him so much unworthy attention.
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 6:27 pm
I agree to a point He already got what he wanted when the media carried his water. I’ve seen it as a non-issue for almost a year, and found little newsworthy about it.
It became apparent to me that it was an issue for discussion when political opponents on the DFL side were talking about it, and members of the community bringing it up in discussions of candidate support. Even that the Stonewall DFL would bring it up shows MDE’s (unfortunate) impact.
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 10:01 pm
Was there any attempt to get a comment from the Franken campaign? Good story, Andy, and I’m glad the story was published prior to the caucuses.
Franken should be prepared for a collection of his anti-gay “jokes” to show up in an ad in Lavender paid for by the Minnesota Republican Party or the Coleman for Senate campaign. The ad would show up in the last issue before the general election.
The Coleman campaign should be prepared for his anti-gay flyer from the 1998 campaign to be reproduced in Lavender.
There is strong support for Al Franken in the gay community. However, I do know from talking to some Stonewall DFLers on background, this issue affected their vote on endorsement.
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 10:40 pm
Franken’s jokes Andy, you missed my point. Of course the issue of Franken’s jokes is being generated by Republicans and many of them are being taken out of context. And that is exactly what will happen in the general election if Franken is the DFL candidate. What I said in introducing Ciresi is not that the GLBT community should be offended by Franken’s jokes but that we should be worried about his ability to beat Norm Coleman. I said that to win we will need to focus on Coleman’s record and make that the issue and not have a candidate whose own record will become the issue. Franken has just said too much on the record for too many years. His jokes and satire can too easily be taken out of context and used in a constant barrage of attacks against him. He will be on the defensive throughout the campaign. I want the campaign to be about Norm and his terrible record in St. Paul and in Washington and not about what Al Franken said on SNL or in one of his books. So the fact that all this is coming from MDE stengthens not weakens my argument.
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 11:35 pm
Thank you Sen. Spear Thanks for your comment and clarification. Maybe it was my own bias at the event — while I don’t think Franken’s past humor reflects on his ability to effectively advocate for LGBT folks at the Senate level, every time I hear the jokes or read them it leaves me a little queasy. So that was my frame when listening to you talk about his jokes.
I get your point now, and have to say it’s a good one. The focus SHOULD be on Norm Coleman. As Eva points out, Coleman has some horrendous black marks regarding LGBT people.
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 11:38 am
Exactly what MDE wanted. Turning something that is a non-issue into an issue is exactly what MDE/Republicans are great at. To position Franken as weak on GLBT issues by any means based off of this kind of stuff out of context is the kind of stuff that caters to the sound-bite crazed folks… but yet people keep turning it into baseless “news.” It's upsetting that the media and bloggers consider this kind of crap worthy of even writing about. That and he's a proven liar over and over again. Yet bloggers, and even the Star Tribune, TPT's Almanac and other sources still regard MDE as a source of information. Drives me up the wall that people give him so much unworthy attention.
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 12:27 pm
I agree to a point He already got what he wanted when the media carried his water. I've seen it as a non-issue for almost a year, and found little newsworthy about it.
It became apparent to me that it was an issue for discussion when political opponents on the DFL side were talking about it, and members of the community bringing it up in discussions of candidate support. Even that the Stonewall DFL would bring it up shows MDE's (unfortunate) impact.
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 4:01 pm
Was there any attempt to get a comment from the Franken campaign? Good story, Andy, and I'm glad the story was published prior to the caucuses.
Franken should be prepared for a collection of his anti-gay “jokes” to show up in an ad in Lavender paid for by the Minnesota Republican Party or the Coleman for Senate campaign. The ad would show up in the last issue before the general election.
The Coleman campaign should be prepared for his anti-gay flyer from the 1998 campaign to be reproduced in Lavender.
There is strong support for Al Franken in the gay community. However, I do know from talking to some Stonewall DFLers on background, this issue affected their vote on endorsement.
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 4:40 pm
Franken's jokes Andy, you missed my point. Of course the issue of Franken's jokes is being generated by Republicans and many of them are being taken out of context. And that is exactly what will happen in the general election if Franken is the DFL candidate. What I said in introducing Ciresi is not that the GLBT community should be offended by Franken's jokes but that we should be worried about his ability to beat Norm Coleman. I said that to win we will need to focus on Coleman's record and make that the issue and not have a candidate whose own record will become the issue. Franken has just said too much on the record for too many years. His jokes and satire can too easily be taken out of context and used in a constant barrage of attacks against him. He will be on the defensive throughout the campaign. I want the campaign to be about Norm and his terrible record in St. Paul and in Washington and not about what Al Franken said on SNL or in one of his books. So the fact that all this is coming from MDE stengthens not weakens my argument.
Comment posted February 4, 2008 @ 5:35 pm
Thank you Sen. Spear Thanks for your comment and clarification. Maybe it was my own bias at the event — while I don't think Franken's past humor reflects on his ability to effectively advocate for LGBT folks at the Senate level, every time I hear the jokes or read them it leaves me a little queasy. So that was my frame when listening to you talk about his jokes.
I get your point now, and have to say it's a good one. The focus SHOULD be on Norm Coleman. As Eva points out, Coleman has some horrendous black marks regarding LGBT people.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment