Iowa state senator: Religious right won’t win Iowa marriage debate
Friday, April 03, 2009 at 3:08 pm
Openly gay Iowa state Sen. Matt McCoy says that same-sex marriage is in his state to stay following a unanimous Iowa Supreme Court decision to allow same-sex couples to wed there in 21 days. Religious right leaders immediately vowed to fight the decision with a constitutional amendment as they did with Prop 8, but Iowa is not California.
“There’s no way a flood of out-of-control money can be used to quickly scare Iowans into going backwards on civil rights,” McCoy, a Democrat, said in a video Friday. “And whether you’re gay or straight, think about coming to Iowa to get married.”
Iowa requires a constitutional amendment to pass the Legislature in two sessions, and each session runs a two-year span. The earliest voters could see an amendment is 2012, just in time for the Iowa presidential caucuses. But the religious right says it will try.
U.S. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa: “Now it is the Iowa legislature’s responsibility to pass the Marriage Amendment to the Iowa Constitution, clarifying that marriage is between one man and one woman, to give the power that the Supreme Court has arrogated to itself back to the people of Iowa. Along with a constitutional amendment, the legislature must also enact marriage license residency requirements so that Iowa does not become the gay marriage Mecca due to the Supreme Court’s latest experiment in social engineering.”
Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council: “We urge Iowans to contact their legislators and urge them to move quickly to pass a constitutional amendment protecting marriage, joining the twenty-nine states that have already defined marriage as the union of one man and one woman in their state constitutions.”
Phyllis Schlafly of Eagle Forum: “We can never allow the definition of marriage to simply mean two consenting persons who agree to share quarters and start applying to the government for benefits. Eagle Forum calls on the Iowa state legislature to work to adopt a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as between one man and one woman only, and by subsequently passing a state law that withdraws jurisdiction from the state courts over this issue.”
Concerned Women for America: “Iowans need to look to the people of California for encouragement and begin working today to pass an amendment by asking our legislators to allow us a vote on an amendment. Sitting legislators should not only support a bill that would allow Iowans a say in the vote, but they should demand their constituents’ voices be heard by sponsoring the bill and offering to bring it to the floor. Any legislator not willing to sponsor such a bill is proving their loyalty is with political agendas and not with the people of Iowa or the intent of our Founding Fathers.”
1 Comment
Comment posted April 3, 2009 @ 5:44 pm
The religious right is a bunch of hypocritical individuals who support ministers who denigrate anyone with a different view, have a different religion, or believe that the United States means what it says when it says Freedom for ALL, Equality for ALL, and other similar sayings that have been circulated in the U.S. for over 200 years. The American Revolution was fought because Americans disliked taxation without representation. Banning same sex marriage effectively makes those individuals who otherwise would marry taxed unfairly and without representation, so in effect those of the right are trying to do to the gay community exactly what England did to the colonies… tax them without representation, since that IS what the IRS effectively does when it denies joint returns, sharing of pensions, and all the other advantages marriage brings. IS that what the ‘Right’ thinks is right? A pox on them. FTR, I am NOT gay but I believe in equality for all, and that includes the right to marry.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






