Rybak’s house for sale — at $200,000 above market value
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 at 5:47 pm
“Calling qualified home buyers“: That’s how a tweet by Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak began on Wednesday. He was announcing a new loan program for city homebuyers, but he might as well have been advertising for himself: Rybak and wife Megan O’Hara are selling their Lake Harriet home — for around $200,000 more than the county’s listed taxable market value.
Hennepin County tax records confirm that the home at 4415 DuPont Avenue South, just two blocks east of Lake Harriet, is owned by the mayor, and an MLS listing puts the asking price at just shy of $750,000.
This story’s sensational headline aside, the asking price doesn’t appear to be off-base: A look at recent home sales in the neighborhood shows that in November a house just down the block sold for $860,000. When he purchased the four-bedroom, three-bath house 19 years ago this month, Rybak paid $180,000. County tax records put the estimated market value of the home at $545,000 (it lists the taxable market value at $506,000, reflecting $39,000 in improvements.)
Aaron Dickinson, an Edina Realty Realtor, says taxable market values often have little to do with a home’s selling price.
“The biggest problem is often these houses haven’t been viewed by the assessors’ office in years at a time,” he says, adding that city employees have to look at thousands of houses across the city. “It’s hard for any tax assessor to be spot on, especially in this market. Tax market value has very little to do with the value of the property.”
Could the fact that a mayor lived there raise the home’s value? “Possibly,” says Dickinson, but the house isn’t (yet?) marketed as the mayor’s. Plus, “that would all depend on your political affiliation.”
So, where’s Rybak going? Is he selling to take up a much-speculated-upon Obama administration job?
Rybak’s communications director Jeremy Hanson assures it’s just a case of “empty-nest downsizing.” With the couple’s youngest daughter heading off to college, they’re seeking a smaller house (not a condo) in Minneapolis.
Hanson says there’s nothing to still-persistent rumors of a spot in the Obama administration for Rybak.
“He’s up for re-election, he loves his job and loves being mayor,” Hanson said. “He’ll use his relationship with the Obama administration to benefit the city and the state, especially during these difficult economic times.”
The state?
Hanson wouldn’t comment on whether Rybak might be eyeing a bigger pad on Summit Avenue in St. Paul — the governor’s office.
“A lot of people are talking about that,” he said. “That’s something for the future.”
Does the mayor qualify for some of the city’s newest homebuyer programs?
“Not that I’m aware of,” says Hanson, indicating that a move to, say, North Minneapolis isn’t in the cards for the Rybak family.
“Most of the housing programs we’re doing are targeted in areas hard hit by foreclosures,” Hanson says. “Last time I checked, Lake Harriet wasn’t one of those neighborhoods.”
14 Comments
Comment posted April 8, 2009 @ 9:57 pm
Why isn’t a move to North Minneapolis something the Mayor would consider?
His living here would show a real personal dedication to understanding the assets and drawbacks of Northside neighborhoods and to improving life (and showing confidence that life WILL improve) for Northsiders and the City.
Even just answering the question of “why not?” in a thoughtful way might give him better perspective on the issues North is facing.
Comment posted April 8, 2009 @ 10:38 pm
Maybe because many other houses in MPLS, like mine, are tax valued over the market price.
We pay so the mayor and his neighbors get a free ride.
Comment posted April 9, 2009 @ 9:24 am
For better or worse, tax value does not equal market value. That headline is incorrect at best, maybe even somewhat inflammatory.
Pingback posted April 9, 2009 @ 9:39 am
[...] Mayor R.T. Rybak’s Lake Harriet area home is up for sale, reports the Minnesota Independent, with an asking price of $750,000. According to Rybak’s communications director Jeremy Hanson, [...]
Comment posted April 9, 2009 @ 10:36 am
Ummm… is anyone considering that perhaps the home is grossly under-valued precisely BECAUSE it is the mayor’s house?
As we’ve seen with many nominees in politics of late, taxation appears to be something for the “little people” to diligently pay, and optional for politicians until they get vetted for a higher office. All is forgiven, they pay their back taxes, and the criminal charges the rest of us would be subjected to are mysteriously dropped or not pursued.
Comment posted April 9, 2009 @ 12:20 pm
Remember when the mayor of Chicago moved to Cabrini Green for a while? She was scared away eventually but it was a catalyst for public housing reform nationwide.
Maybe R.T., who sometimes likes to pretend he’s interested in the environment, could use this opportunity to move to someplace a bit more walkable than suburban Lake Harriet. Oh wait, but if he moved someplace walkable he’d have to give up his job, because Minneapolis isn’t walkable.
http://walkscore.com/get-score.php?street=4415+Dupont+Ave+S%2C+Minneapolis%2C+mn&go=Go
Comment posted April 9, 2009 @ 4:33 pm
If the good mayor can get $200K above the taxable listing – which, in spite of the realtors assertions is at least loosely market-based, then I’d want an investigation conducted to make sure the buyer isn’t just some phat-cat influence-buyer, who will be repaid with some huge government contract later worth millions when RT hits the next big public job. If RT can get 200 above, maybe Norm Coleman can similarly sell his, and get out from his underwater mortgage situation.
Comment posted April 9, 2009 @ 4:59 pm
Jeff, tax value does not equal market value, that is the point.
Let me spell this out for you. I have a house tax valued over market price. I pay a large tax
bill. The mayor has a house tax value about 30% less than market price, he pays a proportionately
smaller tax bill (30%) than the rest of us that are valued at over market price.
Therefore we subsidize the mayor. Or is that still not clear?
Comment posted April 10, 2009 @ 12:20 am
“The house hasn’t been viewed by the assessor’s office in years”???? How lucky for him. The county keeps raising my home valuation and I’ve had the assessor to my home twice in the last 5 years to get the valuation lowered to where it belongs! How nice for the mayor that he gets such preferential treatment as being ignored by the assessors office. Wish I could receive such favors.
Comment posted April 10, 2009 @ 9:10 am
Cyn,
That’s not what the story says. Dickinson, who is not the real estate agent working on Rybak’s house, was speaking generally about how many houses assessors have to look at and how that sometimes means it’s years between assessments.
Comment posted April 10, 2009 @ 10:47 am
I’m not defending the Mayor here, but home values in that neck of the woods tend to be very high. Thus, since all homeowners in the city pay the same property tax rate (special assessments aside), people there tend to pay a lot more in taxes, even if the tax assessed value is below the market value. And, theoretically at least, they do not get any higher level of service than residents elsewhere in the city.
All I’m saying is that while they are in some sense getting a good deal if assessed values as a function of market values tend to be lower there than in other parts of the city, that does not necessarily mean that the rest of the city is subsidizing them. It is not that simple.
Comment posted April 13, 2009 @ 9:47 pm
Josh, if you are rich and have a big rich house you pay the at the proper evaluation, otherwise you
are being subsidized by people that are actually paying the proper evaluated rate. By your reasoning
just because Bill Gates pays $100 more than you in Fed taxes it is OK, cuz he gets the
same Federal services, even as he swims in a big bank vault filled with money like Scrooge McDuck? Or maybe you are rich with no sense of justice and civic morals.
Comment posted April 14, 2009 @ 9:54 am
I don’t think the mayor indicated that he wasn’t going to move to the north side, I think the author of the article is concluding he won’t because the Mayor doesn’t qualify for incentives here – it’s a kind of joke, but I don’t think it is the mayors.
Re valuation and property tax burden. Remember that all taxes are paid out of your income, regardless of what they’re assessed against. Property taxes tend to work out regressively and they are a detriment to the pursuit of home ownership. Unfortunately we have a very income tax adverse group of state leaders and virtually no power to levy a progressive tax on the local level, so we’re stuck with it.
But as regards our houses here in Folwell and elsewhere that are evaluated higher than market value and the Linden Hills houses that are evaluated lower, the only real question regarding the fairness of the taxes each home owner pays is about the total sum as a percentage of income.
Since the tax is flat, and since as income increase so does the value of the home and also the property tax valuate (but only up to a point – you can’t buy a 250,000,000 home in minneapolis), the richest pay less of their income to property taxes. I think that’s unfair.
I’d solve that problem, if I were in charge of everything (haha), by exempting the first couple hundred thousand dollars of taxable value so a family in a modest house would not pay property tax on it, but someone with multiple homes or a more valuable home than average (or needed, perhaps) would pay for the overage.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.






