<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pawlenty saving himself for right time to say whether he&#8217;ll sign Senate certificate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/31670/pawlenty-practices-abstinence-saving-himself-for-right-time-to-sign-senate-certificate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/31670/pawlenty-practices-abstinence-saving-himself-for-right-time-to-sign-senate-certificate</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/31670/pawlenty-practices-abstinence-saving-himself-for-right-time-to-sign-senate-certificate/comment-page-1#comment-29150</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=31670#comment-29150</guid>
		<description>The GOP argument: Because some invalid absentee ballots were accepted, all invalid absentee ballots should be accepted. (equal protection) 

Basis for Charles Manson&#039;s new appeal: &quot;Because some people have gotten away with murder, I should get away with murder&quot;

Right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP argument: Because some invalid absentee ballots were accepted, all invalid absentee ballots should be accepted. (equal protection) </p>
<p>Basis for Charles Manson&#8217;s new appeal: &#8220;Because some people have gotten away with murder, I should get away with murder&#8221;</p>
<p>Right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/31670/pawlenty-practices-abstinence-saving-himself-for-right-time-to-sign-senate-certificate/comment-page-1#comment-28721</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=31670#comment-28721</guid>
		<description>“We just need more information as to evaluating this case.”   Translation:  I have to see how this will play with the national Republicans before I can so much as think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We just need more information as to evaluating this case.”   Translation:  I have to see how this will play with the national Republicans before I can so much as think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Kramden</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/31670/pawlenty-practices-abstinence-saving-himself-for-right-time-to-sign-senate-certificate/comment-page-1#comment-28718</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Kramden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=31670#comment-28718</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Chris.  I saw that one.  I was just wondering if Page was going to recuse because he chose the ECC panel.  (I wouldn&#039;t think so, but I&#039;m not familiar with the finer points of judicial ethics.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Chris.  I saw that one.  I was just wondering if Page was going to recuse because he chose the ECC panel.  (I wouldn&#8217;t think so, but I&#8217;m not familiar with the finer points of judicial ethics.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Steller</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/31670/pawlenty-practices-abstinence-saving-himself-for-right-time-to-sign-senate-certificate/comment-page-1#comment-28706</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Steller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=31670#comment-28706</guid>
		<description>Re: which justices will abstain, see this post: http://minnesotaindependent.com/31513/justices-magnuson-and-anderson-will-not-hear-senate-contest-appeal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: which justices will abstain, see this post: <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/31513/justices-magnuson-and-anderson-will-not-hear-senate-contest-appeal" rel="nofollow">http://minnesotaindependent.com/31513/justices-magnuson-and-anderson-will-not-hear-senate-contest-appeal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Kramden</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/31670/pawlenty-practices-abstinence-saving-himself-for-right-time-to-sign-senate-certificate/comment-page-1#comment-28705</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Kramden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=31670#comment-28705</guid>
		<description>Y&#039;know, so far he&#039;s right.  I expected a full verdict from the ECC by now.  (Has the clock started on appealing the decision on the first claim?)  What&#039;s the composition of the Supremes that will hear the appeal?  Will Page recuse?  (I doubt it.)  How long to decide the appeal? (2 days, I would have guessed, but MN jurists are apparently much more careful than I expected.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know, so far he&#8217;s right.  I expected a full verdict from the ECC by now.  (Has the clock started on appealing the decision on the first claim?)  What&#8217;s the composition of the Supremes that will hear the appeal?  Will Page recuse?  (I doubt it.)  How long to decide the appeal? (2 days, I would have guessed, but MN jurists are apparently much more careful than I expected.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
