Even as Democratic Party organizations roll out videos and radio ads urging Norm Coleman to give up his claim on his old U.S. Senate seat, the head of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor party made this pronouncement about the Republican’s election-contest appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court: “It’s over.”
Video after the jump.
DFL chair Brian Melendez’s assessment of Coleman’s chances on appeal before the Minnesota Supreme Court came after he critiqued the arguments in a preliminary filing yesterday.
Repeating a line of a attack made by Franken attorney Marc Elias, Melendez pointed out that only one of five Coleman claims would add rather than remove votes from last fall’s election — hardly the enfranchisement Coleman’s camp is espousing.
Melendez disputed the notion that the post-election drama has become a “debacle.” The system is working well, he said — it’s just that people in “the Coleman campaign are exercising bad judgment in how far to push their rights.”
Still, Coleman can litigate “to his heart’s content,” said Melendez — as long as Minnesota’s second U.S. Senator gets seated in the meantime.
The DFL is hoping to stir such sentiments with its “Give It Up, Norm” campaign. Melendez unveiled the campaign’s second Web video (see below) at a State Capitol press conference today.
Melendez claimed to have received “a significant blip” of e-mails from “Coleman voters out there who are tired of the litigation.” When pressed, he said that by “blip” he meant a dozen.
Asked about Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s role, Melendez also said “the state executive branch has nothing to do with this” beyond the “ministerial” task of issuing an election certificate. Melendez also said instant runoff voting would have broken Franken-Coleman logjam by distributing ballots for Independence Party candidate Dean Barkley between the two leading vote-getters.
Here’s the DFL’s new Web ad, titled “Norm Would Step Back.”













5 Comments »
Comment posted April 21, 2009 @ 3:56 pm
what comments are necessary?
Comment posted April 22, 2009 @ 7:39 am
Here’s a comment – I disagree with the DFL airing these sentiments at this time. Coleman’s side is still within their rights to appeal this decision at the state level, and if roles were reversed, I would support a DFL appeal.
If roles were reversed, I’m sure the volume of howls from the Republicans would be 100 times larger than these gentle prods. But that doesn’t justify this campaign. Yet.
Once Coleman loses in the MN SC, *then* would be the time for this ad.
Comment posted April 22, 2009 @ 11:27 am
Coleman’s side is certainly within their rights to appeal this decision, but I think the DFL’s purpose is to make the Coleman team think twice about taking it to the Federal level. I think it would be highly unlikely the MN SC will rule against the three judge panel and the canvassing board. Everyone’s worried that Coleman will try to stop the certification with a Federal lawsuit and hang this up as long as possible, which is the Republican strategy, even when they know it’s a losing effort.
Comment posted April 22, 2009 @ 1:07 pm
Coleman has the right to appeal – but that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do, and if Franken were in his position I would not support the suit. There’s no actual evidence of vote counting irregularity that would justify overturning the results of this election. It’s a frivolous lawsuit, plain and simple.
Franken won, let’s be done.
Comment posted April 23, 2009 @ 2:46 am
No, Franken did not win. You may like to think that, but we have an ap[peals process here. Had the tables been turned, you bet every liberal in this state would be screaming for Franken to go right to the Supreme Court.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment