Comments on: Minnesota torture critics weigh in on Bush-era memos http://minnesotaindependent.com/33063/miles-johnson-rowley-anderson-torture News. Politics. Media. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: johnhkennedy http://minnesotaindependent.com/33063/miles-johnson-rowley-anderson-torture/comment-page-1#comment-31798 johnhkennedy Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:37:22 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=33063#comment-31798 Push Obama to do the right thing and bring Bush, Cheney and their appointee lawyers to Justice. SIGN THE PETITION To Prosecute Them For Torture http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG Over 250,000 have signed Join them and call yourself a Patriot . Push Obama to do the right thing and bring Bush, Cheney and their appointee lawyers to Justice.

SIGN THE PETITION To Prosecute Them For Torture

http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

Over 250,000 have signed
Join them and call yourself a Patriot

.

]]> By: Matt http://minnesotaindependent.com/33063/miles-johnson-rowley-anderson-torture/comment-page-1#comment-30493 Matt Thu, 07 May 2009 20:43:24 +0000 http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=33063#comment-30493 A few questions for clarity;clarity is paramount on this issue: 1.Would someone please define torture? And where outside of the law the U.S. was complicit in carrying it out specifically. Does the U.S. military torture it's own soldiers for purposes of training? If so, is this okay? Why or why not? How do the professionals on torture in this piece answer to the additional torture memos that state that some of the enhanced interrogation methods DID PRODUCE tangible intelligence results? An answer to this is particularly relevant in the presence of a definition of torture; moreover relevant in lieu of the fact that these torture professionals contend that torture NEVER works for benefit of intelligence gathering. Any answers from these professionals would be appreciated. A few questions for clarity;clarity is paramount on this issue:
1.Would someone please define torture? And where outside of the law the U.S. was complicit in carrying it out specifically.

Does the U.S. military torture it’s own soldiers for purposes of training? If so, is this okay? Why or why not?

How do the professionals on torture in this piece answer to the additional torture memos that state that some of the enhanced interrogation methods DID PRODUCE tangible intelligence results? An answer to this is particularly relevant in the presence of a definition of torture; moreover relevant in lieu of the fact that these torture professionals contend that torture NEVER works for benefit of intelligence gathering.

Any answers from these professionals would be appreciated.

]]>