Minnesotans have have had enough of Norm Coleman’s efforts to overturn the result of the U.S. Senate contest, a pair of new polls indicate. The Star Tribune’s Minnesota Poll found that 64 percent of respondents think Coleman should concede the race, while just 28 percent indicated that the Republican’s appeal to the state’s top court is “appropriate.”
The drawn-out process has also seriously eroded Coleman’s approval ratings. Just 38 percent of those surveyed indicated that they view the Republican favorably, while 55 percent viewed him unfavorably. Franken’s standing with Minnesotans, however, isn’t much better. Nearly half (48 percent) view him unfavorably, while 43 percent look upon him favorably.
The telephone survey of 1,042 Minnesota residents consisted of 36 percent Democrats, 20 percent Republicans and 37 percent independents. It had a margin of error of four percentage points, plus or minus.
Another poll, commissioned by Alliance for a Better Minnesota, found similarly widespread dissatisfaction with Coleman’s continuing legal contest. Roughly 60 percent of respondents indicated that the former senator should concede, while just 34 percent of those polled also expressed approval for the way the statewide recount was conducted. Just over 60 percent believed that the process was “fair, impartial, accurate and carried out according to Minnesota law,” while just over a quarter of respondents disagreed with this statement.
Most Minnesotans also now believe that Franken was the victor in last year’s election, according to the ABM poll. The DFLer was deemed the winner by 54 percent of the respondents, while just over a quarter believe Coleman received more votes.
The ABM poll, conducted by Grove Insights, surveyed 600 registered voters between April 22 and 25. It has a margin of error of four percentage points, plus or minus.













5 Comments »
Comment posted April 26, 2009 @ 5:58 pm
Are Franken’s numbers all that far off ?
FYI : as a point of comparison, according to an April 14-15 PublicPolicyPolling survey, 47% of voters approve of Governor Pawlenty’s work with 40% disapproving.
So, if Pawlenty is sitting at 47 and Franken at 43, Franken is relatively on par with Pawlenty and unchanged while Coleman clearly is collapsing.
IMO, the Strib headline writer unfairly picked on Franken. Assuming that this is not a follow-up interview using the same poll participants, a different sample group would be expected to provide “Favorable” ratings within a narrow margin. Franken’s moved from 47 to 43 … which is exactly the margin of error stated in the article … 4.
However, Coleman’s move from 46 to 38 clearly shows deterioration.
That said, for Franken, he clearly has a problem. He was elected with only 42% support. Considering the venom that his opponents spew, I doubt that Franken will ever cross 55. The PPP survey reported that 62% of Minnesota voters like the job that Klobuchar is doing with just 25% dissenting. Klobuchar’s numbers are helped by a 30% approval rating from Republicans … a number that Franken could only dream of getting. Franken has gotten a lot of “drag-along” bad publicity from Coleman’s legal challenges … until he actually gets seated and voters have a chance to see how he performs, this is meaningless.
Pawlenty numbers at 47 Favorable to 40 Unfavorable show the delicate minefield that he must walk … balancing the budget … and resolve the “to sign or not to sign” election certificate issue. The MN-Supreme Court agreement to Coleman’s timetable clearly gives Pawlenty a Big Break as the question will now move to the back burner until mid-June. The “to sign or not to sign” question may not have a big impact on his rating, but how he is perceived in handling the budget will set the tone for 2010.
Everything must be looked at in perspective.
Comment posted April 26, 2009 @ 6:55 pm
So now that Coleman has thrown away his political career, what do you think he should do next? Fry cook? Real Estate? Frankly, if Coleman is willing to wash my car, I would spot him a few bucks to help with his court case.
Pingback posted April 26, 2009 @ 7:45 pm
[...] As long as Coleman remains in this race, Minnesota is underrepresented and, as they should, they’re getting pissed about it. I hope the voices of Minnesotans are heard on this issue and Coleman is forced to back out. We [...]
Pingback posted April 26, 2009 @ 11:16 pm
[...] Memo, Norweigianity, The Week, Random Cowboy, Wall Street Journal, Minnesota Daily, The Confluence, Minnesota Independent, Congress Matters, Huff Post, Daily Kos, Right Of Course, Air America, My DD, Media [...]
Comment posted April 27, 2009 @ 11:56 am
I already spotted Coleman a small contribution to assist with his battle. As far as I’m concerned, “Franken’s Lead” is highly suspect. Remember, Franken contested the election in the first place, so he’s the one that started all of this. It is only natural for the current “results” to be suspect, as it it the first time in history that there has been such a swing in the vote count in a contested election. It is obvious that the appellate court has not followed the precedent set by Bush v. Gore, so I say the fight should continue and let the Supreme Court have the final word.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment