<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Franken on Specter in &#8216;96: &#8216;Hopeless&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/33602/franken-specter-hopeless-1996/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/33602/franken-specter-hopeless-1996</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: threegoal</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/33602/franken-specter-hopeless-1996/comment-page-1#comment-30053</link>
		<dc:creator>threegoal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=33602#comment-30053</guid>
		<description>Franken gets credit for foreseeing Lieberman as the 2000 Democratic nominee for VP before Gore even knew it.  &quot;Why Not Me?&quot; is a really funny book.

Franken wins the nomination due to a campaign based on eliminating ATM fees and a lot of dirty tricks against Gore.  And then he creams Gingrich.  Then all goes to hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franken gets credit for foreseeing Lieberman as the 2000 Democratic nominee for VP before Gore even knew it.  &#8220;Why Not Me?&#8221; is a really funny book.</p>
<p>Franken wins the nomination due to a campaign based on eliminating ATM fees and a lot of dirty tricks against Gore.  And then he creams Gingrich.  Then all goes to hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Kramden</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/33602/franken-specter-hopeless-1996/comment-page-1#comment-29956</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Kramden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=33602#comment-29956</guid>
		<description>@Paul - it&#039;s a reference to &quot;Why Not Me&lt;/a&gt;?&quot; a 1999 book in which Al Franken runs for President, and chooses Lieberman as his running mate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul &#8211; it&#8217;s a reference to &#8220;Why Not Me?&#8221; a 1999 book in which Al Franken runs for President, and chooses Lieberman as his running mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/33602/franken-specter-hopeless-1996/comment-page-1#comment-29938</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=33602#comment-29938</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Franken/Lieberman, that was a kickass senatorial ticket. 

Uh... what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Franken/Lieberman, that was a kickass senatorial ticket. </p>
<p>Uh&#8230; what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Kramden</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/33602/franken-specter-hopeless-1996/comment-page-1#comment-29934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Kramden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=33602#comment-29934</guid>
		<description>I think your headline is grossly misleading.  Nowhere does Franken label Specter himself as &quot;hopeless&quot;.

Seems to me Franken is ridiculing the Republicans a lot more than Specter in that excerpt.  As a matter of fact, what Franken seems to be saying is that Specter doesn&#039;t fit in the Republican party, an observation that looks more than a little prescient now.  &quot;Hopeless&quot; summed up Specter&#039;s chances of leading the Republican ticket perfectly, no?

But let&#039;s not forget that Al&#039;s taste in Senators is suspect, given that he chose *Lieberman* as his running mate, in the interest of ticket balance (Al is reform, Joe is orthodox).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your headline is grossly misleading.  Nowhere does Franken label Specter himself as &#8220;hopeless&#8221;.</p>
<p>Seems to me Franken is ridiculing the Republicans a lot more than Specter in that excerpt.  As a matter of fact, what Franken seems to be saying is that Specter doesn&#8217;t fit in the Republican party, an observation that looks more than a little prescient now.  &#8220;Hopeless&#8221; summed up Specter&#8217;s chances of leading the Republican ticket perfectly, no?</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s not forget that Al&#8217;s taste in Senators is suspect, given that he chose *Lieberman* as his running mate, in the interest of ticket balance (Al is reform, Joe is orthodox).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
