<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Edwards and Norm Coleman have a few things in common</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/33983/john-edwards-norm-coleman/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/33983/john-edwards-norm-coleman</link>
	<description>News. Politics. Media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:43:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Kramden</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/33983/john-edwards-norm-coleman/comment-page-1#comment-30344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Kramden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=33983#comment-30344</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Chris.  I tried to follow the links back but I didn&#039;t find that one.

Frankly, I think it&#039;s a bit of a stretch to say that Holder said that being an ex-Senator is a &quot;get out of jail free&quot; card, especially because the overwhelming &quot;circumstance&quot; of the case was the egregious prosecutorial misconduct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Chris.  I tried to follow the links back but I didn&#8217;t find that one.</p>
<p>Frankly, I think it&#8217;s a bit of a stretch to say that Holder said that being an ex-Senator is a &#8220;get out of jail free&#8221; card, especially because the overwhelming &#8220;circumstance&#8221; of the case was the egregious prosecutorial misconduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Steller</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/33983/john-edwards-norm-coleman/comment-page-1#comment-30335</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Steller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=33983#comment-30335</guid>
		<description>Hi Ralph, thanks for the comment. Following the link back to my earlier post on Holder dropping charges against Stevens, I see the main source was a NPR report. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102589818&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Online&lt;/a&gt;, NPR provides Holder&#039;s full statement. The closest Holder actually comes in that statement is this: &quot;...in consideration of &lt;strong&gt;the totality of the circumstances of this particular case&lt;/strong&gt;, I have determined that it is in the interest of justice to dismiss the indictment and not proceed with a new trial.&quot; 

In her report, Nina Totenberg clarifies what that means (though she doesn&#039;t cite a source): 
&lt;blockquote&gt;With more ugly hearings expected, Holder is said to have decided late Tuesday to pull the plug. His decision is said to be based on Stevens&#039; age — he&#039;s 85 — &lt;strong&gt;and the fact that Stevens is no longer in the Senate&lt;/strong&gt;. Perhaps most important, Justice Department officials say Holder wants to send a message to prosecutors throughout the department that actions he regards as misconduct will not be tolerated.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I changed the attribution in this post to NPR&#039;s report rather than Holder&#039;s own words. Thanks again for pointing that out. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ralph, thanks for the comment. Following the link back to my earlier post on Holder dropping charges against Stevens, I see the main source was a NPR report. <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102589818" rel="nofollow">Online</a>, NPR provides Holder&#8217;s full statement. The closest Holder actually comes in that statement is this: &#8220;&#8230;in consideration of <strong>the totality of the circumstances of this particular case</strong>, I have determined that it is in the interest of justice to dismiss the indictment and not proceed with a new trial.&#8221; </p>
<p>In her report, Nina Totenberg clarifies what that means (though she doesn&#8217;t cite a source): </p>
<blockquote><p>With more ugly hearings expected, Holder is said to have decided late Tuesday to pull the plug. His decision is said to be based on Stevens&#8217; age — he&#8217;s 85 — <strong>and the fact that Stevens is no longer in the Senate</strong>. Perhaps most important, Justice Department officials say Holder wants to send a message to prosecutors throughout the department that actions he regards as misconduct will not be tolerated.</p></blockquote>
<p>I changed the attribution in this post to NPR&#8217;s report rather than Holder&#8217;s own words. Thanks again for pointing that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Kramden</title>
		<link>http://minnesotaindependent.com/33983/john-edwards-norm-coleman/comment-page-1#comment-30333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Kramden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://minnesotaindependent.com/?p=33983#comment-30333</guid>
		<description>You have said, &quot;One reason Attorney General Eric Holder says he’s dropping charges against former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens is that Stevens is no longer a senator.&quot;

Where exactly did Holder say that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have said, &#8220;One reason Attorney General Eric Holder says he’s dropping charges against former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens is that Stevens is no longer a senator.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where exactly did Holder say that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
